-
Kling, R.; McKim, G.: Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing (1999)
0.14
0.14088283 = product of:
0.21132424 = sum of:
0.11866455 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11866455 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6047207 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
0.09265969 = product of:
0.18531938 = sum of:
0.18531938 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18531938 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.7557093 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003)
0.11
0.10952209 = product of:
0.16428313 = sum of:
0.12457183 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12457183 = score(doc=4272,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6348245 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
0.0397113 = product of:
0.0794226 = sum of:
0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0794226 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
-
Kling, R.; Spector, L.B.; Fortuna, J.: ¬The Real Stakes of Virtual Publishing : The Transformation of E-Biomed Into PubMed Central (2004)
0.10
0.10297667 = product of:
0.154465 = sum of:
0.073404655 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073404655 = score(doc=2096,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.37407395 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.08106035 = product of:
0.1621207 = sum of:
0.1621207 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1621207 = score(doc=2096,freq=12.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.66110796 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In May 1999, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Harold Varmus proposed an electronic repository for biomedical research literature server called "E-biomed." E-biomed reflected the visions of scholarly electronic publishing advocates: It would be fully searchable, be free to readers, and contain full-text versions of both preprint and postpublication biomedical research articles. However, within 4 months, the E-biomed proposal was radically transformed: The preprint section was eliminated, delays were instituted between article publication and posting to the archive, and the narre was changed to "PubMed Central." This case study examines the remarkable transformation of the E-biomed proposal to PubMed Central by analyzing comments about the proposal that were posted to an online E-biomed forum created by the NIH, and discussions that took place in other face-to-face forums where E-biomed deliberations took place. We find that the transformation of the E-biomed proposal into PubMed Central was the result of highly visible and highly influential position statements made by scientific societies against the proposal. The literature about scholarly electronic publishing usually emphasizes a binary conflict between (trade) publishers and scholars/scientists. We conclude that: (1) scientific societies and the individual scientists they represent do not always have identical interests in regard to scientific e-publishing; (2) stakeholder politics and personal interests reign supreme in e-publishing debates, even in a supposedly status-free online forum; and (3) multiple communication forums must be considered in examinations of e-publishing deliberations.
-
Kling, R.; Callahan, E.: Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication (2002)
0.04
0.03955485 = product of:
0.11866455 = sum of:
0.11866455 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11866455 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6047207 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kling, R.; McKim, G.; King, A.: ¬A bit more to it : scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks (2003)
0.02
0.016952079 = product of:
0.050856233 = sum of:
0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050856233 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.259166 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, we examine the conceptual models that help us understand the development and sustainability of scholarly and professional communication forums an the Internet, such as conferences, pre-print servers, field-wide data sets, and collaboratories. We first present and document the information processing model that is implicitly advanced in most discussions about scholarly communications-the "Standard Model." Then we present an alternative model, one that considers information technologies as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks (STINs). STIN models provide a richer understanding of human behavior with online scholarly communications forums. They also help to further a more complete understanding of the conditions and activities that support the sustainability of these forums within a field than does the Standard Model. We illustrate the significance of STIN models with examples of scholarly communication forums drawn from the fields of high-energy physics, molecular biology, and information systems. The article also includes a method for modeling electronic forums as STINs.
-
Lamb, R.; King, J.L.; Kling, R.: Informational environments : organizational contexts of online information use (2003)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 7.2006 18:43:22
-
Kling, R.; Rosenbaum, H.; Sawyer, S.: Understanding and communicating social informatics : a framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies (2005)
0.00
0.003205776 = product of:
0.009617328 = sum of:
0.009617328 = product of:
0.019234655 = sum of:
0.019234655 = weight(_text_:22 in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019234655 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Classification
- 303.48/33 22
- DDC
- 303.48/33 22
