Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Document markup (1997) 0.14 
    0.14268866 = product of:
  0.21403298 = sum of:
    0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101712465 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.518332 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
    0.11232051 = product of:
      0.22464103 = sum of:
        0.22464103 = weight(_text_:publishing in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22464103 = score(doc=182,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.91605806 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Considers the role of the document markup languages: SGML, HTML and the newer and potentially highly significant XML in the field of electronic publishing
    Source
    Digital publishing technologies. 2(1997) no.4, S.10-16
  2. Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993) 0.08 
    0.08050447 = product of:
  0.1207567 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.052948397 = product of:
      0.10589679 = sum of:
        0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10589679 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Report commissioned by Book Industry Communications (BIC) and funded by the British National Bibliography Research Fund and the Britsh National Bibliographic Service. The aims of the project were: to review the provisions for bibliographic data within EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport); to compare those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and the book publishing industry, and to examine the implications for MARC based databases, such as UKMARC
  3. Green, B.: Towards international standards for book sector EDI (1995) 0.08 
    0.08050447 = product of:
  0.1207567 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
    0.052948397 = product of:
      0.10589679 = sum of:
        0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10589679 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the British and European book industry communication stadards organizations BIC (Book Industry Communication) in the UK, EDItEUR (its pan-European counterpart), and BISAC (Book Industry Systems Advisory Committe). The work of the organisations enables collaboration between the publishing, bookselling, library and manufacturing sectors of the industry worldwide. Discusses Electronic Data Interchange (EDI); TeleOrdering; the international EDIFACT standard, EDI with SGML; and published lists of mandatory and recommended data elements for publishers' bibliographic databases
  4. Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995) 0.08 
    0.08050447 = product of:
  0.1207567 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
    0.052948397 = product of:
      0.10589679 = sum of:
        0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10589679 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Offers the conceptual modelling technique as a means of analysing the future of library cataloguing with regard to cataloguing rules and MARC formats. Discusses the evolution of publishing technology and introduces the conceptual model that the IFLA is preparing in its study of the functional requirements of bibliographic records. Considers the purpose of cataloguing rules and how they have evolved in response to changes in technologies. Examines the future of cataloguing with future rules and alternative communication formats
  5. McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998) 0.08 
    0.08050447 = product of:
  0.1207567 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
    0.052948397 = product of:
      0.10589679 = sum of:
        0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10589679 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
  6. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.07 
    0.07085174 = product of:
  0.106277615 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
    0.03846931 = product of:
      0.07693862 = sum of:
        0.07693862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07693862 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  7. Brownrigg, E.; Butler, B.: ¬An electronic library communications format : a definition and development proposal for MARC III (1990) 0.04 
    0.03955485 = product of:
  0.11866455 = sum of:
    0.11866455 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11866455 = score(doc=2326,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.6047207 = fieldWeight in 2326, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2326)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Memex Research Institute has proposed a research project to describe in machine-readable form all the information needed to create electronic "books" in a standard communications format. Two kinds of extended computer file formats employing the MARC structure will be defined: Access Formats that take into consideration the many existing index and abstract system formats and their associated databases; and Document Formats that provide for storage, representation, transmission, and display of machine-readabie works in text or image form. The formats that emerge can be employed by libraries, publishers, information utilities, and computer users worldwide to convert printed works to electronic forms or to create original works in electric format, and thus foment the creation of networked electronic library collections.
  8. Hein, M.: Aesthetics and quality in format conversion (1996) 0.04 
    0.03914915 = product of:
  0.11744745 = sum of:
    0.11744745 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11744745 = score(doc=4893,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.5985183 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The constant change of technology produces a shorter life cycle for electronic formats than for conventional formats. In libraries and archives, information may have a longer life cycle than elsewhere. The technical problems of electronic format conversion may become overwhelming. Discusses aesthetics and quality assurance issues
    Source
    Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  9. Riemer, J.J.: Adding 856 Fields to authority records : rationale and implications (1998) 0.03 
    0.034255505 = product of:
  0.102766514 = sum of:
    0.102766514 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102766514 = score(doc=3715,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.5237035 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses ways of applying MARC Field 856 (Electronic Location and Access) to authority records in online union catalogues. In principle, each catalogue site location can be treated as the electronic record of the work concerned and the MARC Field 856 can then refer to this location as if it were referring to the location of a primary record. Although URLs may become outdated, the fact that they are located in specifically defined MARC Fields makes the data contained amenable to the same link maintenance software ae used for the electronic records themselves. Includes practical examples of typical union catalogue records incorporating MARC Field 856
  10. Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994) 0.03 
    0.033904158 = product of:
  0.101712465 = sum of:
    0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101712465 = score(doc=866,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.518332 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
  11. Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999) 0.03 
    0.033904158 = product of:
  0.101712465 = sum of:
    0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101712465 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.518332 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  12. Hendrix, F.: MARC harmonisation : strategies for the future (1997) 0.03 
    0.031965148 = product of:
  0.09589544 = sum of:
    0.09589544 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09589544 = score(doc=1760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.48868814 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Considers the future for the MARC record format in the electronic age. Suggests its use for cataloguing Internet resources. The convergence of UKMARC with US, and Canada formats is long overdue. The change over needs to be done quickly within a 3-year period. The British Library should continue providing MARC records, but the role of the NBA to market and control the access to and control of the redistribution of these records should change. The library community should take a global view of MARC and its function in the electronic age
  13. Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999) 0.03 
    0.031965148 = product of:
  0.09589544 = sum of:
    0.09589544 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09589544 = score(doc=2932,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.48868814 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
  14. Hollis, R.; Brunelle, B.S.: Developing a common user interface for information searching (1995) 0.03 
    0.028253464 = product of:
  0.08476039 = sum of:
    0.08476039 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08476039 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.43194336 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Electronic library. 13(1995) no.4, S.283-286
  15. Wall, C.E.; Cole, T.W.; Kazmer, M.M.: HyperText MARCup : a conceptualization for encoding, de-constructing, searching, retrieving, and using traditional knowledge tools (1995) 0.03 
    0.027969502 = product of:
  0.083908506 = sum of:
    0.083908506 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083908506 = score(doc=4186,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.4276021 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Pierian Press and the University of Illinois have been experimenting with directly parsing classified, analytical bibliographies into an electronic structure using the respective strengths of both HTML and MARC. This structure, which is explained and illustrated in this article, mitigates the weaknesses of each standard by drawing on the strengths of the other. The resulting electronic knowledge constructs can be mounted on local library systems and function as dynamic maps onto a specified subset of resources on those systems. Linkages can be added and/or removed to customize each construct to local holdings and/or needs
  16. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.02 
    0.02397386 = product of:
  0.07192158 = sum of:
    0.07192158 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07192158 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.3665161 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
  17. McCallum, S.: What makes a standard? (1996) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=5104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the characteristics of de jure standards developed by the formal standards organizations (ISO, ANSI, and NISO) and formal industry groups, and de facto standards developed by informal, self selected groups and companies. Compares this process with that used to develop Internet standards. Examines 3 key standards for the library community on this basis: standards that form the basis for encoding bibliographic data (MARC); standards for electronic documents (SGML-based), and standards for ordering and purchasing bibliographic items (EDIFACT-based)
  18. Flammia, G.: Document object models for the information marketplace (1997) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Extensible Markup Language (XML) is an extension of HTML which simplifies the creation of specialized markup languages for any application domain without requiring knowledge of SGML. Reviews some of the features of XML that make it attractive for conducting secure electronic transactions over the Internet and keeping a record of them
  19. Campos, F.M.: UNIMARC: the virtual format in the virtual age (1998) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Focuses on the history of the UNIMARC format which was designed as a communication tool among the various national formats used for computerized bibliographic records. Explains the function of UNIMARC and ISBDs in bringing together automated versions of catalogues without greatly compromising individual or local characteristics. Gives examples of European projects which have resulted in products which illustrate the value of UNIMARC and discusses its application to electronic media and future in international networks
  20. Bierbaum, E.G.: ¬A modest proposal : no more main entry (1994) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 8166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=8166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 8166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8166)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the origins of the concept of main entry and of confusion about what is meant by the term: a card in the catalogue, or a line above the the description serving as an access point. Examines the drawbacks of dual meaning: the full bibliographic record headed by the name of the author; and the author heading itself. Calls for change in the transfer to the electronic catalogue of terminology that was only descriptive and meaningful in the card catalogue. Proposes, in answer to the question of how the role of the entry can be transformed into uniform, collocative author-name access in the MARC record, that the 100/110 main entry MARC field be transformed into the primary field for the creator's authorized personal or corporate name

Authors

Languages

  • e 32
  • f 3
  • d 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 35
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes