Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.06443256 = product of:
  0.09664884 = sum of:
    0.08304789 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08304789 = score(doc=1447,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.42321634 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.013600955 = product of:
      0.02720191 = sum of:
        0.02720191 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02720191 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.039956436 = product of:
  0.1198693 = sum of:
    0.1198693 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1198693 = score(doc=1994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.61086017 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Examines the nuts-and-bolts practical matters of making this cataloging system work in the Internet environment, where information objects are electronic, transient, and numerous.

0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports a preliminary analysis of organizational schemes applied by academic libraries worldwide to arrange their electronic resources an their Web-based information gateways. The unsystematic sample consists of 41 academic libraries in 10 countries representing 4 languages, Chinese, English, German, and Spanish. The study reveals a widely accepted practice in applying 6 simplistic methods to organizing online information: by resource type, alphabetical by title, alphabetical by subject (mostly discipline and genre), by vendor/publisher, by broad classification, and random. In addition, it notes a marked difference between libraries in the English-speaking world and those in other countries in that the former present significantly more systematic characteristics.

0.013358384 = product of:
  0.040075153 = sum of:
    0.040075153 = sum of:
      0.026474198 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026474198 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05019314 = queryNorm
          0.10795847 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
      0.013600955 = weight(_text_:22 in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013600955 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05019314 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Ein solches Modell stellt auch die vom Land Nordrhein-Westfalen ins Leben gerufene Open Access-Initiative Digital Peer Publishing' dar, die sich die Kooperation von Wissenschaftlern und Bibliothekaren explizit auf die Fahne geschrieben hat: bei acht elektronischen Fachzeitschriften sollen "Redaktionstandems" aus Fachwissenschaftlern und Hochschulbibliothekaren gemeinsam neue Wege der Informationsversorgung beschreiten. Das geschichtswissenschaftliche E-Journal "Zeitenblicke" wurde als ältestes dieser Projekte von der Kölner Historikerin Gudrun Gersmann vorgestellt. Hier präsentierte sich eine gehaltvolle E-Zeitschrift, deren Inhalte gelegentlich im Schnittfeld sowohl des historischen als auch des bibliothekarischen Interesses liegen. Leider wurde dabei nicht völlig klar, welche Rolle die beteiligten Bibliotheken (hier die USB Köln) beim DiPP-Projekt konkret spielen. Ähnliches lässt sich zu einigen der Präsentationen im Bereich E-Learning und Wissensmanagement sagen. So bot zwar die Präsentation von Ulrike Wigger (Köln) zum "Wissensmanagement an der Deutschen Sporthochschule Köln" eine durchaus beeindruckende Übersicht über die technischen Möglichkeiten multimedialen E-Learnings. Hier wie auch in den eher allgemeinen Überlegungen von Ute Engelkenmeier (Dortmund) blieb jedoch die entscheidende Frage nach einer überzeugenden Gesamtkonzeption der "universitären Integration" (Wigger) des Wissensmanagements unter Einschluss der Hochschulbibliotheken zu weiten Teilen unbeantwortet.

Date

22. 1.2005 19:05:37

0.0068004774 = product of:
  0.020401431 = sum of:
    0.020401431 = product of:
      0.040802862 = sum of:
        0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040802862 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2009 17:57:50

0.0045336518 = product of:
  0.013600955 = sum of:
    0.013600955 = product of:
      0.02720191 = sum of:
        0.02720191 = weight(_text_:22 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02720191 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22