Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Pollard, R.: Hypertext presentation of thesauri used in on-line searching (1990) 0.08 
    0.08050447 = product of:
  0.1207567 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
    0.052948397 = product of:
      0.10589679 = sum of:
        0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10589679 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Electronic publishing review. 3(19909) no.3, S.155-172
  2. Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998) 0.06 
    0.05542263 = product of:
  0.08313394 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.023801671 = product of:
      0.047603343 = sum of:
        0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047603343 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  3. Smith, D.A.: Use of a thesaurus in two-stage information retrieval of electronic records (1996) 0.05 
    0.04794772 = product of:
  0.14384316 = sum of:
    0.14384316 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14384316 = score(doc=1965,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.7330322 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Proceedings of the DLM-Forum on Electronic Records, Brussels, 18-20 December 1996
  4. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.05 
    0.04750511 = product of:
  0.071257666 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
    0.020401431 = product of:
      0.040802862 = sum of:
        0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040802862 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    After a period of experiment and evolution in the 1950s and 1960s, a fairly standard format for thesauri was established with the publication of the influential Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST) in 1967. This and other early thesauri relied primarily an the presentation of terms in alphabetical order. The value of a classified presentation was subsequently realised, and in particular the technique of facet analysis has profoundly influenced thesaurus evolution. Thesaurofacet and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus have acted as models for two distinct breeds of thesaurus using faceted displays of terms. As of the 1990s, the expansion of end-user access to vast networked resources is imposing further requirements an the style and structure of controlled vocabularies. The international standards for thesauri, first conceived in a print-based era, are badly in need of updating. Work is in hand in the UK and the USA to revise and develop standards in support of electronic thesauri.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  5. Milstead, J.L.: Invisible thesauri : the year 2000 (1995) 0.03 
    0.028253464 = product of:
  0.08476039 = sum of:
    0.08476039 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08476039 = score(doc=4565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.43194336 = fieldWeight in 4565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4565)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The author predicts that thesauri will still be in use in the year 2000 and electronic versions will be quite common, however, rather in an invisible way for the user
  6. Chen, H.; Yim, T.; Fye, D.: Automatic thesaurus generation for an electronic community system (1995) 0.02 
    0.024468219 = product of:
  0.073404655 = sum of:
    0.073404655 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073404655 = score(doc=2918,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.37407395 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports an algorithmic approach to the automatic generation of thesauri for electronic community systems. The techniques used included terms filtering, automatic indexing, and cluster analysis. The testbed for the research was the Worm Community System, which contains a comprehensive library of specialized community data and literature, currently in use by molecular biologists who study the nematode worm. The resulting worm thesaurus included 2709 researchers' names, 798 gene names, 20 experimental methods, and 4302 subject descriptors. On average, each term had about 90 weighted neighbouring terms indicating relevant concepts. The thesaurus was developed as an online search aide. Tests the worm thesaurus in an experiment with 6 worm researchers of varying degrees of expertise and background. The experiment showed that the thesaurus was an excellent 'memory jogging' device and that it supported learning and serendipitous browsing. Despite some occurrences of obvious noise, the system was useful in suggesting relevant concepts for the researchers' queries and it helped improve concept recall. With a simple browsing interface, an automatic thesaurus can become a useful tool for online search and can assist researchers in exploring and traversing a dynamic and complex electronic community system
  7. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (1997) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Managing information 5(1998) no.3, S.42 (L. Will); Electronic library 16(1998) no.4, S.266 (I. Fourie); Knowledge organization 26(1999) no.2, S.103-104 (M.P. Satija)
  8. Thesaurus software (2001) 0.02 
    0.021840101 = product of:
  0.0655203 = sum of:
    0.0655203 = product of:
      0.1310406 = sum of:
        0.1310406 = weight(_text_:publishing in 6773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1310406 = score(doc=6773,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5343672 = fieldWeight in 6773, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Members offer comments and suggest resources on programs for creating, maintaining, and publishing thesauri. Formerly a tool for writers and indexers, the thesaurus has taken on a new role as an essential component of the corporate information infrastructure. Many people are using word processor or database programs to create and maintain thesauri, while others are using specialized tools that perform consistency checks and offer special reporting capabilities. Some also use thesaurus modules integrated into another application, such as web publishing, content management, or e-commerce. This article includes material comes from our own experience, email responses from members, and comments from participants in our seminars and roundtables. There's also an introduction to thesauri in a corporate information management system
  9. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.02 
    0.021840101 = product of:
  0.0655203 = sum of:
    0.0655203 = product of:
      0.1310406 = sum of:
        0.1310406 = weight(_text_:publishing in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1310406 = score(doc=604,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5343672 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.
  10. Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Electronic Libraries and Information Highways MITRE Sponsored Research project aims to help searchers working in digital libraries increase their chance of matching the language of authors. Focuses on whether query formulation can be improved through the addition of semantic knowledge that is interactively gathered from a thesaurus that exists in a distributed, interoperating, cooperative environment. A prototype, ELVIS, was built that improves information retrieval through query expansion and is based on publicly available Z39.50 standard thesauri integrated with networked information discovery and retrieval tools
  11. Hudon, M.: Multilingual thesaurus construction : integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts (1997) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to papers read at the 1996 Electronic Access to Fiction research seminar at Copenhagen, Denmark
  12. Retti, G.; Stehno, B.: ¬The Laurin thesaurus : a large, multilingual, electronic thesaurus for newspaper clipping archives (2004) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Lee, M.; Baillie, S.; Dell'Oro, J.: TML: a Thesaural Markpup Language (200?) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are used to provide controlled vocabularies for resource classification. Their use can greatly assist document discovery because thesauri man date a consistent shared terminology for describing documents. A particular thesauras classifies documents according to an information community's needs. As a result, there are many different thesaural schemas. This has led to a proliferation of schema-specific thesaural systems. In our research, we exploit schematic regularities to design a generic thesaural ontology and specfiy it as a markup language. The language provides a common representational framework in which to encode the idiosyncrasies of specific thesauri. This approach has several advantages: it offers consistent syntax and semantics in which to express thesauri; it allows general purpose thesaural applications to leverage many thesauri; and it supports a single thesaural user interface by which information communities can consistently organise, score and retrieve electronic documents.
  14. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Planning controlled vocabularies for the UK public sector (2003) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In the UK, the aim to make public sector information much more available to the citizen has led to establishment of an "e-Govemment Interoperability Framework" based an a set of core standards. Among the standards is a controlled vocabulary, known as the Govemment Category List (GCL), used to select keywords for the metadata of all electronic resources originating from central or local govemment. The GCL is a small and simple taxonomy, designed to facilitate high-level browsing rather than deep searching. Specialized thesauri for particular subject areas may optionally complement the GCL. To ease the indexing burden, GCL terms will often be selected by direct mapping from the specialized vocabularies.
  15. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services (2004) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=4863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web and the use of HTML-based information displays has greatly increased access to online information sources, but at the same time limits the ways in which they can be used. By the same token, Web-based indexing and search engines give us access to the full text of online documents, but make it difficult to access them in any kind of organized, systematic way. For years before the advent of the Internet, lexicographers built weIl-structured subject thesauri to organize large collections of documents. These have since been converted into electronic form and even put online, but in ways that are largely uncoordinated and not useful for searching. This paper describes some of the ways in which XML-based Web services could be used to coordinate subject thesauri and other online vocabulary sources to create a "Thesauro-Web" that could be used by both searchers and indexers to improve subject access an the Internet.
  16. Shiri, A.; Chambers, T.: Information retrieval from digital libraries : assessing the potential utility of thesauri in supporting users' search behaviour in an interdisciplinary domain (2008) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    The objective of this research was to investigate the extent to which thesauri have the potential to support the search behaviour of nanoscience and technology researchers while interacting with an electronic book digital library. Transaction log data was obtained from a nanoscience and technology digital library to investigate the nature, type and characteristics of users' queries and search terms. The specific objectives was to assess the extent to which users' search terms matched with those found in two well-established thesauri attached o the INSPEC and Compendex databases.
  17. Kempf, A.O.; Baum, K.: Thesaurus-based indexing of research data in the social sciences : opportunities and difficulties of internationalization efforts (2013) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=1656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Efforts towards internationalization have become increasingly important in scientific environments. As for content-based indexing of scientific research data, however, standards leading to internationally coherent indexing which is vital for retrieval purposes are not yet sufficiently developed. Even concerning the concrete use of indexing instruments, launched by initiatives on an international scale, there are still no binding policies and guidelines. Against this backdrop, essential criteria which internationally applicable indexing systems should meet will be outlined. These will be illustrated through the multilingual European Language Social Science Thesaurus (ELSST), originally based on the UK Data Archive's (UKDA) Humanities and Social Science Electronic Thesaurus (HASSET) and ultimately developed by the Council of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA). Additionally, the general pros and cons of using international versus national indexing languages will be weighed using the ELSST and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TSS) developed by GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences. In this light, the benefit of vocabulary crosswalks for supporting a combined use of international and national indexing systems will be discussed.
  18. Baca, M.; Gill, M.: Encoding multilingual knowledge systems in the digital age : the Getty vocabularies (2015) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper gives an overview of the history, development, and structure of the electronic thesauri produced and maintained by the Getty Research Institute (GRI). We describe the evolution of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT®), the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN®), and the Union List of Artist Names (ULAN®) as multilingual, cross-cultural knowledge organization systems (KOS); the factors that make them unique; and their potential, when expressed as Linked Open Data (LOD) to play a key role in the Semantic Web.
  19. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.02 
    0.01586778 = product of:
  0.047603343 = sum of:
    0.047603343 = product of:
      0.095206685 = sum of:
        0.095206685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095206685 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  20. Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.02 
    0.015443282 = product of:
  0.046329845 = sum of:
    0.046329845 = product of:
      0.09265969 = sum of:
        0.09265969 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09265969 = score(doc=4656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 8
  • f 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 43
  • el 6
  • m 5
  • n 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications