Search (920 results, page 1 of 46)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.30
    0.29960904 = product of:
      0.44941354 = sum of:
        0.13561662 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13561662 = score(doc=4654,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.69110936 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.31379694 = sum of:
          0.25939313 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25939313 = score(doc=4654,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              1.0577728 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05440382 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    LCSH
    Scholarly publishing / Evaluation
    Scholarly electronic publishing / Evaluation
    RSWK
    Scholarly electronic publishing -- Evaluation
    Subject
    Scholarly electronic publishing -- Evaluation
    Scholarly publishing / Evaluation
    Scholarly electronic publishing / Evaluation
  2. Marcondes, C.H.; Costa, L.C da.: ¬A model to represent and process scientific knowledge in biomedical articles with semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.11
    0.10674836 = product of:
      0.16012253 = sum of:
        0.05993465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05993465 = score(doc=2829,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30543008 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
        0.10018788 = sum of:
          0.0661855 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0661855 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
          0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03400239 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization faces the challenge of managing the amount of knowledge available on the Web. Published literature in biomedical sciences is a huge source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be managed through automatic methods. The conventional channel for reporting scientific results is Web electronic publishing. Despite its advances, scientific articles are still published in print formats such as portable document format (PDF). Semantic Web and Linked Data technologies provides new opportunities for communicating, sharing, and integrating scientific knowledge that can overcome the limitations of the current print format. Here is proposed a semantic model of scholarly electronic articles in biomedical sciences that can overcome the limitations of traditional flat records formats. Scientific knowledge consists of claims made throughout article texts, especially when semantic elements such as questions, hypotheses and conclusions are stated. These elements, although having different roles, express relationships between phenomena. Once such knowledge units are extracted and represented with technologies such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and linked data, they may be integrated in reasoning chains. Thereby, the results of scientific research can be published and shared in structured formats, enabling crawling by software agents, semantic retrieval, knowledge reuse, validation of scientific results, and identification of traces of scientific discoveries.
    Date
    12. 3.2016 13:17:22
  3. Chaudiron, S.; Ihadjadene, M.: Studying Web search engines from a user perspective : key concepts and main approaches (2012) 0.10
    0.09504539 = product of:
      0.14256808 = sum of:
        0.042380195 = weight(_text_:electronic in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042380195 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.21597168 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.10018788 = sum of:
          0.0661855 = weight(_text_:publishing in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0661855 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
          0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03400239 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:22:37
    Imprint
    Hershey, PA : IGI Publishing
  4. Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019) 0.09
    0.08770707 = product of:
      0.13156061 = sum of:
        0.08476039 = weight(_text_:electronic in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08476039 = score(doc=101,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.43194336 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.046800215 = product of:
          0.09360043 = sum of:
            0.09360043 = weight(_text_:publishing in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09360043 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Imprint
    London, UK : Facet Publishing
    LCSH
    Libraries and museums / Electronic information resources
    Electronic information resources
    Subject
    Libraries and museums / Electronic information resources
    Electronic information resources
  5. Berry, M.W.; Esau, R.; Kiefer, B.: ¬The use of text mining techniques in electronic discovery for legal matters (2012) 0.09
    0.085197926 = product of:
      0.12779689 = sum of:
        0.088085584 = weight(_text_:electronic in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088085584 = score(doc=91,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.44888872 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic discovery (eDiscovery) is the process of collecting and analyzing electronic documents to determine their relevance to a legal matter. Office technology has advanced and eased the requirements necessary to create a document. As such, the volume of data has outgrown the manual processes previously used to make relevance judgments. Methods of text mining and information retrieval have been put to use in eDiscovery to help tame the volume of data; however, the results have been uneven. This chapter looks at the historical bias of the collection process. The authors examine how tools like classifiers, latent semantic analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization deal with nuances of the collection process.
    Imprint
    Hershey, PA : IGI Publishing
  6. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.08
    0.0805407 = product of:
      0.12081105 = sum of:
        0.103809856 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103809856 = score(doc=1632,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5290204 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
        0.017001195 = product of:
          0.03400239 = sum of:
            0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03400239 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Leeuwen, T.N. van; Tatum, C.; Wouters, P.F: Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level (2018) 0.08
    0.07975882 = product of:
      0.11963823 = sum of:
        0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050856233 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.259166 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
        0.068781994 = product of:
          0.13756399 = sum of:
            0.13756399 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13756399 = score(doc=4458,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.56096876 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article1 describes the possibilities to analyze open access (OA) publishing in the Netherlands in an international comparative way. OA publishing is now actively stimulated by Dutch science policy, similar to the United Kingdom. We conducted a bibliometric baseline measurement to assess the current situation, to be able to measure developments over time. We collected data from various sources, and for three different smaller European countries (the Netherlands, Denmark, and Switzerland). Not all of the analyses for this baseline measurement are included here. The analysis presented in this article focuses on the various ways OA can be defined using the Web of Science, limiting the analysis mainly to Gold OA. From the data we collected we can conclude that the way OA is currently registered in various electronic bibliographic databases is quite unclear, and various methods applied deliver results that are different, although the impact scores derived from the data point in the same direction.
  8. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.: Linked data for Lilibraries, archives and museums : how to clean, link, and publish your metadata (2014) 0.08
    0.07577532 = product of:
      0.11366297 = sum of:
        0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06780831 = score(doc=5153,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
        0.04585466 = product of:
          0.09170932 = sum of:
            0.09170932 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09170932 = score(doc=5153,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.37397915 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Libraries, archives and museums are facing up to the challenge of providing access to fast growing collections whilst managing cuts to budgets. Key to this is the creation, linking and publishing of good quality metadata as Linked Data that will allow their collections to be discovered, accessed and disseminated in a sustainable manner. This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Metadata experts Seth van Hooland and Ruben Verborgh introduce the key concepts of metadata standards and Linked Data and how they can be practically applied to existing metadata, giving readers the tools and understanding to achieve maximum results with limited resources. Readers will learn how to critically assess and use (semi-)automated methods of managing metadata through hands-on exercises within the book and on the accompanying website. Each chapter is built around a case study from institutions around the world, demonstrating how freely available tools are being successfully used in different metadata contexts. This handbook delivers the necessary conceptual and practical understanding to empower practitioners to make the right decisions when making their organisations resources accessible on the Web. Key topics include, the value of metadata; metadata creation - architecture, data models and standards; metadata cleaning; metadata reconciliation; metadata enrichment through Linked Data and named-entity recognition; importing and exporting metadata; ensuring a sustainable publishing model. This will be an invaluable guide for metadata practitioners and researchers within all cultural heritage contexts, from library cataloguers and archivists to museum curatorial staff. It will also be of interest to students and academics within information science and digital humanities fields. IT managers with responsibility for information systems, as well as strategy heads and budget holders, at cultural heritage organisations, will find this a valuable decision-making aid.
    Imprint
    London : Facet Publishing
    LCSH
    Libraries and museums / Electronic information resources
    Archives / Electronic information resources
    Subject
    Libraries and museums / Electronic information resources
    Archives / Electronic information resources
  9. Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly intent (2014) 0.08
    0.07519734 = product of:
      0.112796 = sum of:
        0.04794772 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04794772 = score(doc=3026,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.24434407 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.06484828 = product of:
          0.12969656 = sum of:
            0.12969656 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12969656 = score(doc=3026,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.5288864 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliometrics has moved well beyond the mere tracking of bibliographic citations. The web enables new ways to measure scholarly productivity and impact, making available tools and data that can reveal patterns of intellectual activity and impact that were previously invisible: mentions, acknowledgments, endorsements, downloads, recommendations, blog posts, tweets. This book describes recent theoretical and practical advances in metrics-based research, examining a variety of alternative metrics -- or "altmetrics" -- while also considering the ethical and cultural consequences of relying on metrics to assess the quality of scholarship. Once the domain of information scientists and mathematicians, bibliometrics is now a fast-growing, multidisciplinary field that ranges from webometrics to scientometrics to influmetrics. The contributors to Beyond Bibliometrics discuss the changing environment of scholarly publishing, the effects of open access and Web 2.0 on genres of discourse, novel analytic methods, and the emergence of next-generation metrics in a performance-conscious age.
    Content
    Inhalt: Scholars and scripts, spoors and scores / Blaise CroninHistory and evolution of (biblio)metrics / Nicola De Bellis -- The citation : from culture to infrastructure / Paul Wouters -- The data it is me! / Ronald E. Day -- The ethics of evaluative bibliometrics / Jonathan Furner -- Criteria for evaluating indicators / Yves Gingras -- Obliteration by incorporation / Katherine W. McCain -- A network approach to scholarly evaluation / Jevin D. West and Daril A. Vilhena -- Science visualization and discursive knowledge / Loet Leydesdorff -- Measuring interdisciplinarity / Vincent Larivière and Yves Gingras -- Bibliometric standards for evaluating research institutes in the natural sciences / Lutz Bornmann, Benjamin E. Bowman, Jonathan Bauer, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier and Margit Palzenberger -- Identifying and quantifying research strengths using market segmentation / Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans -- Finding and recommending scholarly articles / Michael J. Kurtz and Edwin A. Henneken -- Altmetrics / Jason Priem -- Web impact measures for research assessment / Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall -- Bibliographic references in Web 2.0 / Judit Bar-Illan, Hadas Shema and Mike Thelwall -- Readership metrics / Stefanie Haustein -- Evaluating the work of judges / Peter Hook -- Academic genealogy / Cassidy R. Sugimoto -- A publishing perspective on bibliometrics / Judith Kamalski, Andrew Plume and Mayur Amin -- Science metrics and science policy / Julia Lane, Mark Largent and Rebecca Rosen.
    LCSH
    Scholarly publishing / Evaluation
    Scholarly electronic publishing / Evaluation
    Subject
    Scholarly publishing / Evaluation
    Scholarly electronic publishing / Evaluation
  10. Leong, J.H.-t.: ¬The convergence of metadata and bibliographic control? : trends and patterns in addressing the current issues and challenges of providing subject access (2010) 0.07
    0.07442193 = product of:
      0.11163288 = sum of:
        0.07192158 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192158 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.3665161 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Resource description and discovery have been facilitated generally in two approaches, namely bibliographic control and metadata, which now may converge in response to current issues and challenges of providing subject access. Four categories of major issues and challenges in the provision of subject access to digital and non-digital resources are: 1) the advancement of new knowledge; 2) the fall of controlled vocabulary and the rise of natural language; 3) digitizing and networking the traditional catalogue systems; and 4) electronic publishing and the Internet. The creation of new knowledge and the debate about the use of natural language and controlled vocabulary as subject headings becomes even more intense in the digital and online environment. The third and fourth categories are conceived after the emergence of networked environments and the rapid expansion of electronic resources. Recognizing the convergence of metadata schemas and bibliographic control calls for adapting to the new environment by developing tools that exploit the strengths of both.
  11. Calì, A. et al.: Processing keyword queries under access limitations (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  12. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  13. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  14. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  15. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  16. Pobar, M. et al.: Multimodal image retrieval based on keywords and low-level image features (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  17. Zhou, Y. et al.: Analysing entity context in multilingual Wikipedia to support entity-centric retrieval applications (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  18. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  19. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.07
    0.06679192 = product of:
      0.20037577 = sum of:
        0.20037577 = sum of:
          0.132371 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.132371 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06800478 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
    Imprint
    London : Facet Publishing
  20. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.06
    0.062018268 = product of:
      0.0930274 = sum of:
        0.05993465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05993465 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30543008 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
        0.03309275 = product of:
          0.0661855 = sum of:
            0.0661855 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0661855 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Imprint
    Cambridge, MA : Elsevier, Chandos Publishing
    LCSH
    Electronic books
    Subject
    Electronic books

Languages

  • e 708
  • d 197
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 764
  • m 101
  • el 86
  • s 30
  • x 15
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • n 2
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications