Search (105 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.06
    0.062986165 = product of:
      0.12597233 = sum of:
        0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011282975 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
        0.11468936 = sum of:
          0.06979179 = weight(_text_:services in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06979179 = score(doc=2453,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047340166 = queryNorm
              0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.04489757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04489757 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047340166 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  2. EIIA; EUSIDIC; EIRENE: Code of practice for information brokers (1994) 0.03
    0.034357365 = product of:
      0.06871473 = sum of:
        0.028833712 = weight(_text_:information in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028833712 = score(doc=1441,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
        0.03988102 = product of:
          0.07976204 = sum of:
            0.07976204 = weight(_text_:services in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07976204 = score(doc=1441,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    The views in this document are those of the compiling parties and do not engage the Commission of the EC. - EIIA = The European Information Industray Association / EUSIDIC = The European Association of Information Services / EIRENE = The European Information Researchers Network
    Source
    Information services and use. 14(1994) no.2, S.115-121
  3. Froehlich, T.J.: Survey and analysis of the major ethical and legal issues facing library and information services (1997) 0.03
    0.030821227 = product of:
      0.061642453 = sum of:
        0.019342242 = weight(_text_:information in 930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019342242 = score(doc=930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=930)
        0.042300213 = product of:
          0.084600426 = sum of:
            0.084600426 = weight(_text_:services in 930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084600426 = score(doc=930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  4. Hodson, S.S.: Ethical and legal aspects of archival services (2009) 0.03
    0.026387924 = product of:
      0.05277585 = sum of:
        0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 3774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012894828 = score(doc=3774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3774)
        0.03988102 = product of:
          0.07976204 = sum of:
            0.07976204 = weight(_text_:services in 3774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07976204 = score(doc=3774,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 3774, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Archivists deal with legal and ethical issues every day in the course of administering collections of personal papers. This entry will discuss legal and ethical aspects of archival services in three areas: acquisitions, access, and terms of use, in the context of research libraries and manuscript repositories. It will not deal with government, corporate, or institutional archives.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  5. Buchanan, E.A.: Ethical transformations in a global information age (1996) 0.03
    0.026156329 = product of:
      0.052312657 = sum of:
        0.02763753 = weight(_text_:information in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02763753 = score(doc=2449,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
        0.024675125 = product of:
          0.04935025 = sum of:
            0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04935025 = score(doc=2449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses various ethical issues which are germane to the global information age. Argues that such profuse and rapid technological change demands a reexamination of how society is defined and understood in this increasingly global environment where technology bridges temporal and spatial boundaries. Alongside the comes the necessity for a reevaluation of societal and informational values. Discusses cross-cultural problems associated with the information age; philosophical aspects of technology; and problems of social equity arising from the concept of information rich versus the information poor. Considers the ethical role of libraries in the information age concluding that libraries can dissolve the lines that have been drawn between the have and the have-nots. Librarians must understand and adhere to their traditional ethical guidelines while also moving forward and readjusting wit - not to - technology
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 13(1996) nos.3/4, S.23-38
  6. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.02
    0.023995128 = product of:
      0.047990255 = sum of:
        0.022334497 = weight(_text_:information in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022334497 = score(doc=3027,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
        0.025655756 = product of:
          0.05131151 = sum of:
            0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05131151 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Within the looming threat of the combination of computer databases with monitoring and surveillance devices, attempts to define the notion of privacy and its parameters. Considers the ethical issues posed by databases, touching on disclosure to organizations of matters such as personal taxation and financial information or security surveillance. Highlights the increasing information imbalance between persons and organizations and suggests ways to improve autonomy
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.42-48
  7. Brown, Y.: From the reference desk to the jail house : unauthorized practice of law and librarians (1994) 0.02
    0.022108905 = product of:
      0.04421781 = sum of:
        0.019542687 = weight(_text_:information in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019542687 = score(doc=2459,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
        0.024675125 = product of:
          0.04935025 = sum of:
            0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04935025 = score(doc=2459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The American Association of Law Librarians Code of Ethics requires librarians to avoid the unauthorized practice of law while providing access to legal information. Provides guidelines and suggestions to help librarians distinguish legal advice from legal information in the context of working with the public. Defining the activities that constitute Unauthorized practice of law is difficult and an ever evolving grey area. Reference service should be confined to assisting patrons in locating legal information and instructing patrons in the use of legal materials using examples unrelated to the patron's issue and advising patrons with legal problems to consult a lawyer
    Source
    Legal reference services quarterly. 13(1994) no.4, S.31-45
  8. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.02
    0.021945897 = product of:
      0.043891795 = sum of:
        0.01823604 = weight(_text_:information in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01823604 = score(doc=6063,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.025655756 = product of:
          0.05131151 = sum of:
            0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05131151 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Aspekte einer Begründung einer Informationsethik betrachtet. Zunächst wird eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung zu konkurrierenden Ethiken - Netz- und Medienethik - gesucht. Aus Sicht der Generierung, Distribution und Bewahrung von Information wird die Informationsethik als umfassender und allgemeiner als die anderen angesehen. Weiterhin wird die Option einer diskursethischen und damit absoluten Begründung der Informationsethik diskutiert und zugunsten einer pragmatistischen Sichtweise zurückgewiesen.
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen
  9. Rubin, R.; Froehlich, T.J.: Ethical aspects of library and information science (2009) 0.02
    0.021387696 = product of:
      0.042775393 = sum of:
        0.021625284 = weight(_text_:information in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021625284 = score(doc=3778,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
        0.021150107 = product of:
          0.042300213 = sum of:
            0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042300213 = score(doc=3778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This entry discusses many of the ethical considerations in the library and information science professions: collection development, censorship, privacy, reference services, copyright, administrative concerns, information access, technology-related issues, and problems with conflicting loyalties. It surveys the factors that affect ethical deliberations in the information professions: social utility, survival, social responsibility, and respect for individuality. It also looks at professional factors in ethical deliberations, such as professional codes of ethics, and the values that support ethical principles of professional conduct: truth, tolerance, individual liberty, justice and beauty. In the final section, it indicates the kinds of actions to promote ethical conduct at the organizational, professional and individual levels. As a final caveat, it indicates that ethical decisions require deliberation and reflection. While one can articulate values, factors, codes, and actions, they inform ethical reflection that must often confront and negotiate dilemmas and tensions.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  10. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.02
    0.019944863 = product of:
      0.039889727 = sum of:
        0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025789656 = score(doc=1360,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
        0.014100071 = product of:
          0.028200142 = sum of:
            0.028200142 = weight(_text_:services in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028200142 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.2, S.267-277
  11. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.02
    0.019275293 = product of:
      0.038550586 = sum of:
        0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012894828 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.025655756 = product of:
          0.05131151 = sum of:
            0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05131151 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.15-23
  12. Beghtol, C.: ¬A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems (2002) 0.02
    0.01895049 = product of:
      0.03790098 = sum of:
        0.016750874 = weight(_text_:information in 4462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016750874 = score(doc=4462,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4462, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4462)
        0.021150107 = product of:
          0.042300213 = sum of:
            0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 4462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042300213 = score(doc=4462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    New technologies have made the increased globalization of information resources and services possible. In this situation, it is ethically and intellectually beneficial to protect cultural and information diversity. This paper analyzes the problems of creating ethically based globally accessible and culturally acceptable knowledge representation and organization systems, and foundation principles for the ethical treatment of different cultures are established on the basis of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The concept of "cultural hospitality", which can act as a theoretical framework for the ethical warrant of knowledge representation and organization systems, is described. This broad discussion is grounded with an extended example of one cultural universal, the concept of time and its expression in calendars. Methods of achieving cultural and user hospitality in information systems are discussed for their potential for creating ethically based systems. It is concluded that cultural hospitality is a promising concept for assessing the ethical foundations of new knowledge representation and organization systems and for planning revisions to existing systems.
  13. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.02
    0.015119502 = product of:
      0.030239005 = sum of:
        0.018900657 = weight(_text_:information in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018900657 = score(doc=2392,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.2274321 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0113383485 = product of:
          0.022676697 = sum of:
            0.022676697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022676697 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.
    Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
    LCSH
    Freedom of information
    Information society
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Subject
    Freedom of information
    Information society
    Information technology / Social aspects
  14. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.01
    0.013716185 = product of:
      0.02743237 = sum of:
        0.011397525 = weight(_text_:information in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011397525 = score(doc=1868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.016034847 = product of:
          0.032069694 = sum of:
            0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032069694 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1134-1142
  15. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.013716185 = product of:
      0.02743237 = sum of:
        0.011397525 = weight(_text_:information in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011397525 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.016034847 = product of:
          0.032069694 = sum of:
            0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032069694 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  16. Ethics and reference services (1982) 0.01
    0.012337563 = product of:
      0.04935025 = sum of:
        0.04935025 = product of:
          0.0987005 = sum of:
            0.0987005 = weight(_text_:services in 7864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0987005 = score(doc=7864,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.56788623 = fieldWeight in 7864, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.011919571 = product of:
      0.023839142 = sum of:
        0.012614749 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012614749 = score(doc=459,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.1517936 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.011224393 = product of:
          0.022448786 = sum of:
            0.022448786 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022448786 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
  18. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.010216774 = product of:
      0.020433549 = sum of:
        0.010812642 = weight(_text_:information in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010812642 = score(doc=462,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.1301088 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.009620908 = product of:
          0.019241815 = sum of:
            0.019241815 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019241815 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
  19. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01
    0.010194257 = product of:
      0.040777028 = sum of:
        0.040777028 = weight(_text_:information in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040777028 = score(doc=1865,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.490671 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1124-1127
    Theme
    Information
  20. Danielson, E.S.: Ethics and reference services (1997) 0.01
    0.009970255 = product of:
      0.03988102 = sum of:
        0.03988102 = product of:
          0.07976204 = sum of:
            0.07976204 = weight(_text_:services in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07976204 = score(doc=482,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047340166 = queryNorm
                0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to reference services for archives and manuscripts

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 90
  • d 13
  • m 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 90
  • m 11
  • s 7
  • More… Less…