Search (4280 results, page 1 of 214)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.30 
    0.3007549 = product of:
  0.6015098 = sum of:
    0.15037745 = product of:
      0.45113236 = sum of:
        0.45113236 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45113236 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.45113236 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45113236 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.27 
    0.27162278 = product of:
  0.36216372 = sum of:
    0.087720186 = product of:
      0.26316056 = sum of:
        0.26316056 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26316056 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26316056 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26316056 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011282975 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.25 
    0.25062913 = product of:
  0.50125825 = sum of:
    0.12531456 = product of:
      0.37594366 = sum of:
        0.37594366 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37594366 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37594366 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37594366 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.23 
    0.23281953 = product of:
  0.31042603 = sum of:
    0.075188726 = product of:
      0.22556618 = sum of:
        0.22556618 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22556618 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22556618 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22556618 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009671121 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  5. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.21 
    0.21077079 = product of:
  0.2810277 = sum of:
    0.050125822 = product of:
      0.15037747 = sum of:
        0.15037747 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15037747 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21266584 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21266584 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.01823604 = weight(_text_:information in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01823604 = score(doc=5820,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  6. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.20 
    0.19709374 = product of:
  0.39418748 = sum of:
    0.075188726 = product of:
      0.22556618 = sum of:
        0.22556618 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22556618 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.31899875 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31899875 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.20 
    0.19651997 = product of:
  0.26202664 = sum of:
    0.06265728 = product of:
      0.18797183 = sum of:
        0.18797183 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18797183 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18797183 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18797183 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.011397525 = weight(_text_:information in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011397525 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Imprint
    Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science
  8. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.19 
    0.19085933 = product of:
  0.2544791 = sum of:
    0.22556618 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22556618 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009671121 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.019241815 = product of:
      0.03848363 = sum of:
        0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03848363 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.13 
    0.12531456 = product of:
  0.25062913 = sum of:
    0.06265728 = product of:
      0.18797183 = sum of:
        0.18797183 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18797183 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18797183 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18797183 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.13 
    0.12531456 = product of:
  0.25062913 = sum of:
    0.06265728 = product of:
      0.18797183 = sum of:
        0.18797183 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18797183 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18797183 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18797183 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.08 
    0.07518873 = product of:
  0.30075493 = sum of:
    0.30075493 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30075493 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.07 
    0.06964598 = product of:
  0.13929196 = sum of:
    0.013959061 = weight(_text_:information in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013959061 = score(doc=4066,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
    0.12533289 = sum of:
      0.0932632 = weight(_text_:services in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0932632 = score(doc=4066,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.536602 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032069694 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is the provision of terminology- and classification-based terminologies interoperability data via web services, initially using interoperability data based on the use of a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) spine, but with an aim to explore other possibilities in time, including the use of other spines. The High-Level Thesaurus Project (HILT) Phase IV developed pilot web services based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS to deliver machine-readable terminology and crossterminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to enhance their subject search or browse services. It also developed an associated toolkit to help information services technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality within service interfaces. Several UK information services have created illustrative user interface enhancements using HILT functionality and these will demonstrate what is possible. HILT currently has the following subject schemes mounted and available: DDC, CAB, GCMD, HASSET, IPSV, LCSH, MeSH, NMR, SCAS, UNESCO, and AAT. It also has high level mappings between some of these schemes and DDC and some deeper pilot mappings available.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  13. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.06 
    0.062986165 = product of:
  0.12597233 = sum of:
    0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011282975 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.11468936 = sum of:
      0.06979179 = weight(_text_:services in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06979179 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.04489757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489757 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.155-170
  14. Lee, J.H.; Price, R.: User experience with commercial music services : an empirical exploration (2016) 0.06 
    0.058264554 = product of:
  0.11652911 = sum of:
    0.013959061 = weight(_text_:information in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013959061 = score(doc=2845,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.10257004 = sum of:
      0.07050035 = weight(_text_:services in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07050035 = score(doc=2845,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.405633 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032069694 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The music information retrieval (MIR) community has long understood the role of evaluation as a critical component for successful information retrieval systems. Over the past several years, it has also become evident that user-centered evaluation based on realistic tasks is essential for creating systems that are commercially marketable. Although user-oriented research has been increasing, the MIR field is still lacking in holistic, user-centered approaches to evaluating music services beyond measuring the performance of search or classification algorithms. In light of this need, we conducted a user study exploring how users evaluate their overall experience with existing popular commercial music services, asking about their interactions with the system as well as situational and personal characteristics. In this paper, we present a qualitative heuristic evaluation of commercial music services based on Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics for user interface design, and also discuss 8 additional criteria that may be used for the holistic evaluation of user experience in MIR systems. Finally, we recommend areas of future user research raised by trends and patterns that surfaced from this user study.
    Date
    17. 3.2016 19:22:15
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.800-811
  15. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.06 
    0.0559911 = product of:
  0.1119822 = sum of:
    0.01367703 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01367703 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.098305166 = sum of:
      0.059821535 = weight(_text_:services in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059821535 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03848363 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  16. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.06 
    0.055102177 = product of:
  0.110204354 = sum of:
    0.015956536 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015956536 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
    0.09424782 = sum of:
      0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04935025 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.04489757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489757 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
  17. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.05 
    0.05354193 = product of:
  0.10708386 = sum of:
    0.013959061 = weight(_text_:information in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013959061 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
    0.09312479 = sum of:
      0.0610551 = weight(_text_:services in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0610551 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032069694 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the context of online question-answering services, an intermediary clarifies the user's needs by eliciting additional information. This research proposes that these elicitations will depend on the type of question. In particular, this research explores the relationship between three constructs: question types, elicitations, and the fee that is paid for the answer. These relationships are explored for a few different question typologies, including a new kind of question type that we call Identity. It is found that the kinds of clarifications that intermediaries elicit depend on the type of question in systematic ways. A practical implication is that interactive question-answering services-whether human or automated-can be steered to focus attention on the kinds of clarification that are evidently most needed for that question type. Further, it is found that certain question types, as well as the number of elicitations, are associated with higher fees. This means that it may be possible to define a pricing structure for question-answering services based on objective and predictable characteristics of the question, which would help to establish a rational market for this type of information service. The newly introduced Identity question type was found to be especially reliable in predicting elicitations and fees.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.289-304
  18. Mathiesen, K.: Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice (2015) 0.05 
    0.053185612 = product of:
  0.106371224 = sum of:
    0.02558738 = weight(_text_:information in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02558738 = score(doc=2119,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
    0.080783844 = sum of:
      0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042300213 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
      0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03848363 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. As the discipline concerned with "facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user" (Belkin, 1975, p. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1305-1322
  19. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.05 
    0.052765395 = product of:
  0.10553079 = sum of:
    0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011282975 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
    0.09424782 = sum of:
      0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04935025 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.04489757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04489757 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.4, S.187-199
  20. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.05 
    0.05226116 = product of:
  0.10452232 = sum of:
    0.011397525 = weight(_text_:information in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011397525 = score(doc=1605,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
    0.09312479 = sum of:
      0.0610551 = weight(_text_:services in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0610551 = score(doc=1605,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032069694 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Numerous studies have explored the possibility of uncovering information from web search queries but few have examined the factors that affect web query data sources. We conducted a study that investigated this issue by comparing Google Trends and Baidu Index. Data from these two services are based on queries entered by users into Google and Baidu, two of the largest search engines in the world. We first compared the features and functions of the two services based on documents and extensive testing. We then carried out an empirical study that collected query volume data from the two sources. We found that data from both sources could be used to predict the quality of Chinese universities and companies. Despite the differences between the two services in terms of technology, such as differing methods of language processing, the search volume data from the two were highly correlated and combining the two data sources did not improve the predictive power of the data. However, there was a major difference between the two in terms of data availability. Baidu Index was able to provide more search volume data than Google Trends did. Our analysis showed that the disadvantage of Google Trends in this regard was due to Google's smaller user base in China. The implication of this finding goes beyond China. Google's user bases in many countries are smaller than that in China, so the search volume data related to those countries could result in the same issue as that related to China.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22

Authors

Languages

  • e 3583
  • d 661
  • a 2
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 3860
  • el 262
  • m 262
  • s 85
  • x 54
  • r 18
  • b 6
  • n 5
  • i 3
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications