Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.03 
    0.027670832 = product of:
  0.055341665 = sum of:
    0.055341665 = product of:
      0.11068333 = sum of:
        0.11068333 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11068333 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  2. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03 
    0.027670832 = product of:
  0.055341665 = sum of:
    0.055341665 = product of:
      0.11068333 = sum of:
        0.11068333 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11068333 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  3. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.03 
    0.025743358 = product of:
  0.051486716 = sum of:
    0.051486716 = product of:
      0.10297343 = sum of:
        0.10297343 = weight(_text_:engines in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10297343 = score(doc=2939,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.39693922 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
  4. White, R.W.: Interactions with search systems (2016) 0.03 
    0.025743358 = product of:
  0.051486716 = sum of:
    0.051486716 = product of:
      0.10297343 = sum of:
        0.10297343 = weight(_text_:engines in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10297343 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.39693922 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    LCSH
    Search engines / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Search engines / Technological innovations
  5. Gardner, S.A.: ¬The changing landscape of contemporary cataloging (2008) 0.03 
    0.025484623 = product of:
  0.050969247 = sum of:
    0.050969247 = product of:
      0.10193849 = sum of:
        0.10193849 = weight(_text_:engines in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10193849 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Intended to contribute to the current dialogue about how the emerging information environment is impacting cataloging issues, this survey paper covers a broad range of topics, such as how search engines compare with integrated library systems, and includes some thoughts on how cataloging processes may evolve to continue to remain relevant. The author suggests that there is a need for significant changes in integrated library system interfaces and infrastructures as well as some changes in cataloging practice. The value of descriptive vs. non-descriptive elements in the catalog record and some pros and cons of the MARC format are covered.
  6. Biagetti, M.T.: Pertinence perspective and OPAC enhancement 0.03 
    0.025484623 = product of:
  0.050969247 = sum of:
    0.050969247 = product of:
      0.10193849 = sum of:
        0.10193849 = weight(_text_:engines in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10193849 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The starting-point of the paper is the debate recently developed in LIS literature about OPAC enhancement and the necessity to design OPACs based on search engines features. Supposed improving tools as relevance ranking and relevance feedback devices are examinated. Possible OPAC development lines, based on theoretical examination of relevance and pertinence concepts, according to Sarácevic view, and following semantics perspectives, are presented. Finally, enhancement of OPACs starting from their inner characteristics is proposed, and a plan to improve semantic search functions while maintaining existing indexing methodologies, that is document conceptual analysis, is outlined.
  7. Ayres, F.H.: Time for change : a new approach to cataloguing concepts (1999) 0.02 
    0.021843962 = product of:
  0.043687925 = sum of:
    0.043687925 = product of:
      0.08737585 = sum of:
        0.08737585 = weight(_text_:engines in 5347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08737585 = score(doc=5347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 5347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Three factors are likely to force dramatic changes in the libraries of the future. They are the increase in electronic publishing, the digitising of conventional library materials, and the Internet which is creating a second information revolution. New concepts are needed for cataloguing functions in the Internet environment. Cataloguing, now a pre-coordinate function should shift to a post-coordinate activity. Authority control should become an activity of the searching stage rather than the cataloguing stage. Uniform titles will be needed as one of the linking mechanisms. The value of ISBD needs to be justified. Issues connected with the Internet and search engines are explored. A scenario for the Catalogue 2000 is given that envisions the cataloguers' aims being the inclusion of library catalogue material that is relevant but not necessarily in the library.
  8. Ivey, R.T.: Perceptions of the future of cataloging : is the sky really falling? (2009) 0.02 
    0.021843962 = product of:
  0.043687925 = sum of:
    0.043687925 = product of:
      0.08737585 = sum of:
        0.08737585 = weight(_text_:engines in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08737585 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Cataloging procedures have evolved in many academic research libraries over the past 10 years. Some predicted trends--outsourcing, original cataloging by paraprofessionals, more digital material--have been borne out. Others, such as a decline in the amount of material to catalog or in the number of professional catalogers, have not. Changes have been mostly procedural and have not affected the catalog itself. Recently, however, the emergence of powerful Internet search engines has allowed researchers to bypass the catalog. This has led some to question the wisdom of continuing it and others to vigorously defended current practice. In 2005-2007 this debate became especially heated, but a consensus appears to be emerging that although the character of the professional cataloger's job will continue to evolve over the next 5 to 10 years there will not be a revolution. The cataloger's basic skills will still be needed and the fundamental nature of cataloging will remain much as we know it.
  9. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02 
    0.020753123 = product of:
  0.041506246 = sum of:
    0.041506246 = product of:
      0.08301249 = sum of:
        0.08301249 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08301249 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  10. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02 
    0.020753123 = product of:
  0.041506246 = sum of:
    0.041506246 = product of:
      0.08301249 = sum of:
        0.08301249 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08301249 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  11. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02 
    0.020753123 = product of:
  0.041506246 = sum of:
    0.041506246 = product of:
      0.08301249 = sum of:
        0.08301249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08301249 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  12. Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009) 0.02 
    0.018203301 = product of:
  0.036406603 = sum of:
    0.036406603 = product of:
      0.072813205 = sum of:
        0.072813205 = weight(_text_:engines in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072813205 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.2806784 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
  13. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.01729427 = product of:
  0.03458854 = sum of:
    0.03458854 = product of:
      0.06917708 = sum of:
        0.06917708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06917708 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  14. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.02 
    0.01729427 = product of:
  0.03458854 = sum of:
    0.03458854 = product of:
      0.06917708 = sum of:
        0.06917708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06917708 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02 
    0.01729427 = product of:
  0.03458854 = sum of:
    0.03458854 = product of:
      0.06917708 = sum of:
        0.06917708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06917708 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  16. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.014674676 = product of:
  0.029349351 = sum of:
    0.029349351 = product of:
      0.058698703 = sum of:
        0.058698703 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058698703 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  17. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01 
    0.013835416 = product of:
  0.027670832 = sum of:
    0.027670832 = product of:
      0.055341665 = sum of:
        0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055341665 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  18. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01 
    0.013835416 = product of:
  0.027670832 = sum of:
    0.027670832 = product of:
      0.055341665 = sum of:
        0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055341665 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  19. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.013835416 = product of:
  0.027670832 = sum of:
    0.027670832 = product of:
      0.055341665 = sum of:
        0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055341665 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.013835416 = product of:
  0.027670832 = sum of:
    0.027670832 = product of:
      0.055341665 = sum of:
        0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055341665 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 12
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 44
  • m 5
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications