-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.19
0.1864826 = product of:
0.3729652 = sum of:
0.071140714 = product of:
0.21342213 = sum of:
0.21342213 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21342213 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3797425 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.30182448 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30182448 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3797425 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.15
0.1509698 = product of:
0.3019396 = sum of:
0.26552784 = weight(_text_:engines in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26552784 = score(doc=5664,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
1.1667583 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.036411747 = product of:
0.072823495 = sum of:
0.072823495 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072823495 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Content
- Darstellung zu verschiedenen search engines des Internet
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Croft, W.B.; Metzler, D.; Strohman, T.: Search engines : information retrieval in practice (2010)
0.14
0.14094809 = product of:
0.28189617 = sum of:
0.17139749 = weight(_text_:engines in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17139749 = score(doc=2605,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.75313926 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
0.1104987 = product of:
0.2209974 = sum of:
0.2209974 = weight(_text_:programming in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2209974 = score(doc=2605,freq=6.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7526697 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- For introductory information retrieval courses at the undergraduate and graduate level in computer science, information science and computer engineering departments. Written by a leader in the field of information retrieval, Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice, is designed to give undergraduate students the understanding and tools they need to evaluate, compare and modify search engines. Coverage of the underlying IR and mathematical models reinforce key concepts. The book's numerous programming exercises make extensive use of Galago, a Java-based open source search engine. SUPPLEMENTS / Extensive lecture slides (in PDF and PPT format) / Solutions to selected end of chapter problems (Instructors only) / Test collections for exercises / Galago search engine
- LCSH
- Search engines / Programming
- Subject
- Search engines / Programming
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.11
0.11066668 = product of:
0.22133335 = sum of:
0.17885299 = weight(_text_:engines in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17885299 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.042480372 = product of:
0.084960744 = sum of:
0.084960744 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084960744 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.11
0.11066668 = product of:
0.22133335 = sum of:
0.17885299 = weight(_text_:engines in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17885299 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.042480372 = product of:
0.084960744 = sum of:
0.084960744 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084960744 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.11
0.11060197 = product of:
0.22120394 = sum of:
0.19996375 = weight(_text_:engines in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19996375 = score(doc=2186,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.87866247 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
-
Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003)
0.11
0.10858273 = product of:
0.21716546 = sum of:
0.2019939 = weight(_text_:engines in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2019939 = score(doc=2117,freq=20.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.88758314 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
0.015171562 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030343125 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an application of the model described in Part I to the evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduates. The study observed how 36 undergraduate used four major search engines to find information for their own individual problems and how they evaluated these engines based an actual interaction with the search engines. User evaluation was based an 16 performance measures representing five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Non-performance (user-related) measures were also applied. Each participant searched his/ her own topic an all four engines and provided satisfaction ratings for system features and interaction and reasons for satisfaction. Each also made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her own information need and participated in post-search Interviews to provide reactions to the search results and overall performance. The study found significant differences in precision PR1 relative recall, user satisfaction with output display, time saving, value of search results, and overall performance among the four engines and also significant engine by discipline interactions an all these measures. In addition, the study found significant differences in user satisfaction with response time among four engines, and significant engine by discipline interaction in user satisfaction with search interface. None of the four search engines dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Content analysis of verbal data identified a number of user criteria and users evaluative comments based an these criteria. Results from both quantitative analysis and content analysis provide insight for system design and development, and useful feedback an strengths and weaknesses of search engines for system improvement
- Date
- 24. 1.2004 18:27:22
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.10
0.10064654 = product of:
0.20129308 = sum of:
0.17701858 = weight(_text_:engines in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17701858 = score(doc=4738,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
-
Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998)
0.10
0.10064654 = product of:
0.20129308 = sum of:
0.17701858 = weight(_text_:engines in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17701858 = score(doc=3278,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
-
Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998)
0.10
0.10064654 = product of:
0.20129308 = sum of:
0.17701858 = weight(_text_:engines in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17701858 = score(doc=3595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The quest for correct information on the Web : hyper search engines (1997)
0.10
0.10004659 = product of:
0.20009318 = sum of:
0.17885299 = weight(_text_:engines in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17885299 = score(doc=7453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a novel method to extract from a web object its hyper informative content, in contrast with current search engines, which only deal with the textual information content. This method is not only valuable per se, but it is shown to be able to considerably increase the precision of current search engines. It integrates with existing search engine technology since it can be implemented on top of every search engine, acting as a post-processor, thus automatically transforming a search engine into its corresponding hyper version. Shows how the hyper information can be usefully employed to face the search engines persuasion problem
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Carroll, N.: Search engine optimization (2009)
0.09
0.09363182 = product of:
0.18726364 = sum of:
0.102201715 = weight(_text_:engines in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102201715 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
0.08506193 = product of:
0.17012386 = sum of:
0.17012386 = weight(_text_:programming in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17012386 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.57940537 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Search engine optimization (SEO) is the craft of elevating Web sites or individual Web site pages to higher rankings on search engines through programming, marketing, or content acumen. This section covers the origins of SEO, strategies and tactics, history and trends, and the evolution of user behavior in online searching.
-
Belew, R.K.: Finding out about : a cognitive perspective on search engine technology and the WWW (2001)
0.09
0.09265944 = product of:
0.18531889 = sum of:
0.12517102 = weight(_text_:engines in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12517102 = score(doc=3346,freq=12.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5500151 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
0.060147867 = product of:
0.12029573 = sum of:
0.12029573 = weight(_text_:programming in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12029573 = score(doc=3346,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.40970147 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The World Wide Web is rapidly filling with more text than anyone could have imagined even a short time ago, but the task of isolating relevant parts of this vast information has become just that much more daunting. Richard Belew brings a cognitive perspective to the study of information retrieval as a discipline within computer science. He introduces the idea of Finding Out About (FDA) as the process of actively seeking out information relevant to a topic of interest and describes its many facets - ranging from creating a good characterization of what the user seeks, to what documents actually mean, to methods of inferring semantic clues about each document, to the problem of evaluating whether our search engines are performing as we have intended. Finding Out About explains how to build the tools that are useful for searching collections of text and other media. In the process it takes a close look at the properties of textual documents that do not become clear until very large collections of them are brought together and shows that the construction of effective search engines requires knowledge of the statistical and mathematical properties of linguistic phenomena, as well as an appreciation for the cognitive foundation we bring to the task as language users. The unique approach of this book is its even handling of the phenomena of both numbers and words, making it accessible to a wide audience. The textbook is usable in both undergraduate and graduate classes on information retrieval, library science, and computational linguistics. The text is accompanied by a CD-ROM that contains a hypertext version of the book, including additional topics and notes not present in the printed edition. In addition, the CD contains the full text of C.J. "Keith" van Rijsbergen's famous textbook, Information Retrieval (now out of print). Many active links from Belew's to van Rijsbergen's hypertexts help to unite the material. Several test corpora and indexing tools are provided, to support the design of your own search engine. Additional exercises using these corpora and code are available to instructors. Also supporting this book is a Web site that will include recent additions to the book, as well as links to sites of new topics and methods.
- LCSH
- Search engines / Programming
Web search engines
- Subject
- Search engines / Programming
Web search engines
-
Thelwall, M.: Quantitative comparisons of search engine results (2008)
0.09
0.09045792 = product of:
0.18091585 = sum of:
0.12775214 = weight(_text_:engines in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12775214 = score(doc=2350,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5613568 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
0.053163704 = product of:
0.10632741 = sum of:
0.10632741 = weight(_text_:programming in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10632741 = score(doc=2350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.36212835 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Search engines are normally used to find information or Web sites, but Webometric investigations use them for quantitative data such as the number of pages matching a query and the international spread of those pages. For this type of application, the accuracy of the hit count estimates and range of URLs in the full results are important. Here, we compare the applications programming interfaces of Google, Yahoo!, and Live Search for 1,587 single word searches. The hit count estimates were broadly consistent but with Yahoo! and Google, reporting 5-6 times more hits than Live Search. Yahoo! tended to return slightly more matching URLs than Google, with Live Search returning significantly fewer. Yahoo!'s result URLs included a significantly wider range of domains and sites than the other two, and there was little consistency between the three engines in the number of different domains. In contrast, the three engines were reasonably consistent in the number of different top-level domains represented in the result URLs, although Yahoo! tended to return the most. In conclusion, quantitative results from the three search engines are mostly consistent but with unexpected types of inconsistency that users should be aware of. Google is recommended for hit count estimates but Yahoo! is recommended for all other Webometric purposes.
-
Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998)
0.09
0.08943219 = product of:
0.17886437 = sum of:
0.14453505 = weight(_text_:engines in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14453505 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.034329325 = product of:
0.06865865 = sum of:
0.06865865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06865865 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Explains how 5 Internet search engines (AltaVista, HotBot, InfoSeek, Lycos, and Yahoo) handle field searching. Includes a chart which identifies where on a search engine's page a particular field is searched and the prefix syntax used, and gives examples. Details the individual fields that can be searched: data, title, URL, images, audiovideo and other page content, links and page depth
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
-
Chaudiron, S.; Ihadjadene, M.: Studying Web search engines from a user perspective : key concepts and main approaches (2012)
0.09
0.085817665 = product of:
0.17163533 = sum of:
0.15646377 = weight(_text_:engines in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15646377 = score(doc=109,freq=12.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.68751884 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
0.015171562 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030343125 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.
- Date
- 20. 4.2012 13:22:37
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64435.
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
-
Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996)
0.08
0.084404774 = product of:
0.16880955 = sum of:
0.14453505 = weight(_text_:engines in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14453505 = score(doc=6597,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reviews the availability on the WWW, of search engines designed to organize various web information sources. Discusses the differences and similarities of each search engine and their advantages and disadvantages. Search engines included in the study were: AltaVista, CUI W3 Catalog, InfoSeek, Lycos, Magellan, Yahoo
- Source
- Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.08
0.084404774 = product of:
0.16880955 = sum of:
0.14453505 = weight(_text_:engines in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14453505 = score(doc=2414,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
-
Loeper, D. von: Sherlock Holmes im Netz (1997)
0.08
0.079047635 = product of:
0.15809527 = sum of:
0.12775214 = weight(_text_:engines in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12775214 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5613568 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
0.030343125 = product of:
0.06068625 = sum of:
0.06068625 = weight(_text_:22 in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06068625 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Beitrag zu den search engines des Internet
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:50:29
-
Chen, L.-C.: Next generation search engine for the result clustering technology (2012)
0.08
0.0754849 = product of:
0.1509698 = sum of:
0.13276392 = weight(_text_:engines in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13276392 = score(doc=105,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.58337915 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.018205874 = product of:
0.036411747 = sum of:
0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036411747 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Result clustering has recently attracted a lot of attention to provide the users with a succinct overview of relevant search results than traditional search engines. This chapter proposes a mixed clustering method to organize all returned search results into a hierarchical tree structure. The clustering method accomplishes two main tasks, one is label construction and the other is tree building. This chapter uses precision to measure the quality of clustering results. According to the results of experiments, the author preliminarily concluded that the performance of the system is better than many other well-known commercial and academic systems. This chapter makes several contributions. First, it presents a high performance system based on the clustering method. Second, it develops a divisive hierarchical clustering algorithm to organize all returned snippets into hierarchical tree structure. Third, it performs a wide range of experimental analyses to show that almost all commercial systems are significantly better than most current academic systems.
- Date
- 17. 4.2012 15:22:11
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64429.
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
