Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.03 
    0.028713647 = product of:
  0.07178412 = sum of:
    0.060151678 = weight(_text_:great in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060151678 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24172091 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.011632439 = product of:
      0.023264877 = sum of:
        0.023264877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023264877 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Mann, T.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report. March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun : A critical review (2006) 0.02 
    0.020594893 = product of:
  0.10297447 = sum of:
    0.10297447 = weight(_text_:business in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10297447 = score(doc=5012,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.47421747 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    According to the Calhoun report, library operations that are not digital, that do not result in resources that are remotely accessible, that involve professional human judgement or expertise, or that require conceptual categorization and standardization rather than relevance ranking of keywords, do not fit into its proposed "leadership" strategy. This strategy itself, however, is based on an inappropriate business model - and a misrepresentation of that business model to begin with. The Calhoun report draws unjustified conclusions about the digital age, inflates wishful thinking, fails to make critical distinctions, and disregards (as well as mischaracterizes) an alternative "niche" strategy for research libraries, to promote scholarship (rather than increase "market position"). Its recommendations to eliminate Library of Congress Subject Headings, and to use "fast turnaround" time as the "gold standard" in cataloging, are particularly unjustified, and would have serious negative consequences for the capacity of research libraries to promote scholarly research.
  3. Cochrane, P.A.: 34th UIUC clinic highlights visualizing subject access (1997) 0.01 
    0.014562788 = product of:
  0.07281394 = sum of:
    0.07281394 = weight(_text_:business in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07281394 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.33532238 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports on the 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, held 2-4 Mar 1997 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The clinic was entitled 'Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources'. Summarizes the following individual sessions: Visual browsing for information retrieval; Hypostatizing data collections, especially bibliographic; Simultaneous searching of distributed information and subject repositories on the WWW; Information filtering from multiple sources; Thesauri in the full text world; The role of controlled vocabulary in visualizing document associations; Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval; Spatial abilities and visualizations; Using IODyne as an indexing tool; Knowledge structures for information visualizing; Visualizing digital libraries; what role for the OPAC?; How will we provide subject access in the Interspace of the 21st century?; Natural language processing based information retrieval; Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation; Using electronic services to become an interbetworked business; and Conference Wrap up
  4. Hrusa, H.; Schaudy, E.: ¬Der alte systematische Katalog der UBTUW online (2004) 0.01 
    0.012135657 = product of:
  0.06067828 = sum of:
    0.06067828 = weight(_text_:business in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06067828 = score(doc=2202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.2794353 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der Alte Systematische Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der TU Wien ist ein Bandkatalog und verzeichnet in einem Grundwerk (erschienen 19011907) und mehreren Nachträgen (insgesamt ca. 80 Bände) den Bestand der Universitätsbibliothek der TU Wien von der Gründung 1815 bis zum Erwerbungsjahr 1965. Da der Schlagwortkatalog erst ab 1930 geführt wurde, bildet der Alte Systematische Katalog die einzige Möglichkeit der thematischen Suche im Bestand der Universitätsbibliothek der TU Wien für die Zeit vor 1930. Insgesamt weist er etwa 170.000 Bände nach. Die Idee einer Digitalisierung des Katalogs ist schon einige Jahre alt. Am weitesten gedieh ein Projekt während eines von HR Mag. Karl Stebegg (der auch wichtige Vorarbeiten für das Einstannen des Katalogs geleistet hatte) geleiteten Praktikums "Digitalisierung alter Bibliothekskataloge" von Herrn Oliver Lobschat, einem Studenten der Universität München und Praktikanten an der UBTUW (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/bandkatalog). Im Rahmen dieses Praktikums wurde die Digitalisierung und die Web-Präsentation der Gruppe Philosophie des Bandkataloges realisiert. Die dabei vorgenommene intellektuelle Durchsicht und Korrektur der gescannten Vorlagen ist zwar ein ideales Modell, würde aber bei Anwendung auf den Gesamtkatalog unsere personellen und finanziellen Ressourcen sprengen. Im Rahmen des von der TU Wien initiierten und von uns realisierten Projektes "TU-Dissertationen Online" (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/ sysbib/diss-projekt.pdf) sammelten wir weitere Erfahrungen. Die elektronische Version unseres Alten Systematischen Katalogs entstand dann als Nebenprodukt des Einscannens der Dissertationen der TU Wien. Mit dem Scannen und der OCR beauftragten wir die Wiener Firma Business Imaging Solutions & Services Gesellschaft m.b.H. (BISS).
  5. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.01 
    0.012030336 = product of:
  0.060151678 = sum of:
    0.060151678 = weight(_text_:great in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060151678 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24172091 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
  6. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.01 
    0.009708526 = product of:
  0.048542626 = sum of:
    0.048542626 = weight(_text_:business in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048542626 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.22354825 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  7. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01 
    0.009305951 = product of:
  0.046529755 = sum of:
    0.046529755 = product of:
      0.09305951 = sum of:
        0.09305951 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09305951 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.01 
    0.009305951 = product of:
  0.046529755 = sum of:
    0.046529755 = product of:
      0.09305951 = sum of:
        0.09305951 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09305951 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  9. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.01 
    0.009022753 = product of:
  0.04511376 = sum of:
    0.04511376 = weight(_text_:great in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04511376 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24172091 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042928502 = queryNorm
        0.18663573 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
  10. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01 
    0.0069794627 = product of:
  0.034897313 = sum of:
    0.034897313 = product of:
      0.069794625 = sum of:
        0.069794625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069794625 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  11. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.01 
    0.0069794627 = product of:
  0.034897313 = sum of:
    0.034897313 = product of:
      0.069794625 = sum of:
        0.069794625 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069794625 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  12. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069794627 = product of:
  0.034897313 = sum of:
    0.034897313 = product of:
      0.069794625 = sum of:
        0.069794625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069794625 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  13. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.01 
    0.0058162194 = product of:
  0.029081097 = sum of:
    0.029081097 = product of:
      0.058162194 = sum of:
        0.058162194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058162194 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  14. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01 
    0.0058162194 = product of:
  0.029081097 = sum of:
    0.029081097 = product of:
      0.058162194 = sum of:
        0.058162194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058162194 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.01 
    0.0058162194 = product of:
  0.029081097 = sum of:
    0.029081097 = product of:
      0.058162194 = sum of:
        0.058162194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058162194 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  16. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.00 
    0.004935226 = product of:
  0.02467613 = sum of:
    0.02467613 = product of:
      0.04935226 = sum of:
        0.04935226 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04935226 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  17. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.00 
    0.0046529756 = product of:
  0.023264877 = sum of:
    0.023264877 = product of:
      0.046529755 = sum of:
        0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046529755 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  18. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.00 
    0.0046529756 = product of:
  0.023264877 = sum of:
    0.023264877 = product of:
      0.046529755 = sum of:
        0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046529755 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  19. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.00 
    0.0046529756 = product of:
  0.023264877 = sum of:
    0.023264877 = product of:
      0.046529755 = sum of:
        0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046529755 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.00 
    0.0046529756 = product of:
  0.023264877 = sum of:
    0.023264877 = product of:
      0.046529755 = sum of:
        0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046529755 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 32
  • d 13
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 41
  • b 3
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • r 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes