Search (2994 results, page 1 of 150)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.12
    0.12052153 = product of:
      0.24104306 = sum of:
        0.24104306 = sum of:
          0.20627843 = weight(_text_:media in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20627843 = score(doc=2598,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.8581759 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
          0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03476463 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.
  2. Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998) 0.11
    0.1113599 = product of:
      0.2227198 = sum of:
        0.2227198 = sum of:
          0.12439059 = weight(_text_:media in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12439059 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.098329216 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098329216 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the role and nature of current awareness services with particular reference to the impact of electronic media, the Internet and WWW on the 5 basic components of these services: databases; user interest profiles; notifications; feedback and document delivery
    Date
    22. 2.1999 17:50:37
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.1023659 = sum of:
      0.081507124 = product of:
        0.24452136 = sum of:
          0.24452136 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24452136 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43507743 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020858778 = product of:
        0.041717555 = sum of:
          0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041717555 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.10
    0.09902026 = sum of:
      0.06792261 = product of:
        0.2037678 = sum of:
          0.2037678 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2037678 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43507743 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.031097647 = product of:
        0.062195294 = sum of:
          0.062195294 = weight(_text_:media in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062195294 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  5. Hendley, T.: Digital mass storage options (1993) 0.10
    0.09817765 = product of:
      0.1963553 = sum of:
        0.1963553 = sum of:
          0.14073189 = weight(_text_:media in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14073189 = score(doc=5080,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.5854839 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes
    Source
    Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32
  6. Hubert, R.: ¬The cataloguing of AV-media (1993) 0.10
    0.09817765 = product of:
      0.1963553 = sum of:
        0.1963553 = sum of:
          0.14073189 = weight(_text_:media in 7197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14073189 = score(doc=7197,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.5854839 = fieldWeight in 7197, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7197)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 7197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=7197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the development of cataloguing rules for audiovisual media in Austria in recent years, and the publication of ÖNORM A 2653, which encapsulates these rules, in 1991. Describes the main features of these rules; the concept of the audiovisual underlining them; their inclusion of unpublished material; the presence of content analysis in the bibliographic description, and the fact that they are aimed at computer cataloguing
    Source
    IASA journal. 1993, no.2, S.22-26
  7. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.09
    0.08691877 = product of:
      0.17383754 = sum of:
        0.17383754 = sum of:
          0.13907291 = weight(_text_:media in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13907291 = score(doc=263,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.5785821 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03476463 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    When people experience major life changes, this often impacts their self-presentation, networks, and online behavior in substantial ways. To effectively study major life transitions and events, we surveyed a large U.S. sample (n = 554) to create the Major Life Events Taxonomy, a list of 121 life events in 12 categories. We then applied this taxonomy to a second large U.S. survey sample (n = 775) to understand on average how much social readjustment each event required, how likely each event was to be shared on social media with different types of audiences, and how much online network separation each involved. We found that social readjustment is positively correlated with sharing on social media, with both broad audiences and close ties as well as in online spaces separate from one's network of known ties. Some life transitions involve high levels of sharing with both separate audiences and broad audiences on social media, providing evidence for what previous research has called social media as social transition machinery. Researchers can use the Major Life Events Taxonomy to examine how people's life transition experiences relate to their behaviors, technology use, and health and well-being outcomes.
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  8. Shahbazi, M.; Bunker, D.; Sorrell, T.C.: Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos : social media and the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) 0.08
    0.07957761 = product of:
      0.15915522 = sum of:
        0.15915522 = sum of:
          0.12439059 = weight(_text_:media in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12439059 = score(doc=1054,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
          0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03476463 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To effectively manage a crisis, most decisions made by governments, organizations, communities, and individuals are based on "shared situational awareness" (SSA) derived from multiple information sources. Developing SSA depends on the alignment of mental models, which "represent our shared version of truth and reality on which we can act." Social media has facilitated public sensemaking during a crisis; however, it has also encouraged mental model dissonance, resulting in the digital destruction of mental models and undermining adequate SSA. The study is concerned with the challenges of creating SSA during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. This paper documents a netnography of Australian public health agencies' Facebook communication, exploring the initial impact of COVID-19 on SSA creation. Chaos theory is used as a theoretical lens to examine information perception, meaning, and assumptions relating to SSA from pre to post-pandemic periods. Our study highlights how the initial COVID-19 "butterfly effect" swamped the public health communication channel, leaving little space for other important health issues. This research contributes to information systems, information science, and communications by illustrating how the emergence of a crisis impacts social media communication, the creation of SSA, and what this means for social media adoption for crisis communication purposes.
    Date
    22. 9.2023 16:02:26
  9. Papers from the workshop on hypermedia and hypertext standards held in Amsterdam, Netherlands, 22-23 April 1993 (1993) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=6320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=6320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a.: WELSCH, L.A.: Multimedia and hypermedia: model and framework. - BRYAN, M.: Standards for text and hypermedia processing. - POPHAM, M.G.: Use of SGML and HyTime in UK universities. - SCHELLER, A.: The Open Document Architecture (ODA) and its HyperODA extensions. - FROMONT, J.: State-of-the-art regarding the various standards for contents related to text, still images, sound and video. - BROEKMAN, H.J.D.: Effective communication with interactive media
  10. Orna, E.: Information products in need of information (1995) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=3804,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=3804,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While technological advances are constantly opening up possibilities for new formats and media, as well as the creation of more traditional products, and while the technology has been strongly promoted, little research has been conducted on the problems of using it cost effectively to create products or on testing and evaluating them: information management. Presents the findings from case studies in a range of business and institutions undertaken as part of a research programme designed to address both the practical and theoretical deficiencies
    Source
    Managing information. 2(1995) no.12, S.22-25
  11. Guenette, D.R.: Document imaging, CD-ROM, and CD-R : a starting point (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=4986,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=4986,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An introduction to technical solutions for the generation and conversion of digital documents, using affordable scanner devices, document imaging systems and OCR technologies with cheap, networkable high storage capacity media such as CD-ROMs and CD-R signals the arrival of CD-ROM based document imaging systems. Describes the processes involved, including: the document imaging process; use of scanners to make bitmaps; data compression; advantages of indexing the images; OCR techniques; and document display. Lists some of the companies providing products and services applicable to CD-ROM and CD-R based document imaging systems
    Date
    6. 9.1996 19:08:22
  12. Hearn, S.: Bibliographic control in the electronic age (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians responsible for organizing access to library collections have an obligation to plan for the future. Developments in the world of information which will inevitably have an impact on how they do their jobs include new forms of media, new cataloguing tools and standards, and new methods of creating, acquiring, and searching for data. Equally if not more important, new models are needed for the range of services which bibliographic control units are working to provide, and for the roles which these units will play in the larger organization
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 22(1996) nos.2/3, S.123-132
  13. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  14. Hoffmann, H.: Cataloguing interactive multimedia using the new guidelines (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the new Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia published by the ALA in 1994. Examines the current and future status of the Guidelines and discusses the problems involved in applying them to the media coming into the library at La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.17-20
  15. Fu, J.Z.: Making urban and regional documents available to the public : classifying and converting a specialized collection (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 34(1996) no.1, S.10-18
  16. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  17. Fewtrell, B.: audio description : Accessing visual media (1997) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Link-up. 14(1997) no.2, S.22
  18. Oxbrow, N.: Information literacy : the final key to an information society (1998) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The terms: information society, the information age, the knowledge based society and the knowledge driven economy are all now familiar terms. Governments have been promoting them, the media has been reporting on them and leaders use them to indicate progress and advancement. In light of all this exposure, considers just how far along the road are these societies from the industrial age towards the information age
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:55:13
  19. Bond, T.J.: Visual image repositories at the Washington State University Libraries (2004) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Civilizations Image Repository (WCIR) and Photos Online are two collaborative image database projects under way at the Washington State University (WSU) Libraries. These projects demonstrate how the WSU Libraries have employed OCLC/DiMeMa's (Digital Media Management) CONTENTdm in partnership with other University departments to develop visual collections free from copyright restrictions, as well as to manage "born digital" images on a collaborative basis.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.198-208
  20. Johnson, P.: Selecting electronic resources : developing a local decision-making matrix (1996) 0.08
    0.077567935 = product of:
      0.15513587 = sum of:
        0.15513587 = sum of:
          0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099512465 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
          0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05562341 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051318336 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24

Authors

Types

  • a 2584
  • m 247
  • s 141
  • el 110
  • b 34
  • r 15
  • i 11
  • x 9
  • n 4
  • p 2
  • ? 1
  • ag 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications