Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029498767 = product of:
      0.058997534 = sum of:
        0.058997534 = product of:
          0.11799507 = sum of:
            0.11799507 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11799507 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.027811704 = product of:
      0.05562341 = sum of:
        0.05562341 = product of:
          0.11124682 = sum of:
            0.11124682 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11124682 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. Chang, R.; Raatjes, R.: Understanding MARC : another look (1990) 0.02
    0.024878116 = product of:
      0.049756233 = sum of:
        0.049756233 = product of:
          0.099512465 = sum of:
            0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099512465 = score(doc=3542,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 27(1990) no.2, S.139-154
  4. Hsueh, L.-k.: ¬The development and implementation of the MARC AMC : an overview (1997) 0.02
    0.024878116 = product of:
      0.049756233 = sum of:
        0.049756233 = product of:
          0.099512465 = sum of:
            0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099512465 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1997) no.2, S.126-147
  5. Mao, C.-C.: ¬The compatibility of CMARC (1998) 0.02
    0.024878116 = product of:
      0.049756233 = sum of:
        0.049756233 = product of:
          0.099512465 = sum of:
            0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 4621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099512465 = score(doc=4621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 4621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1998) no.4, S.310-337
  6. Loviscach, J.: Formen mit Normen (2000) 0.02
    0.024878116 = product of:
      0.049756233 = sum of:
        0.049756233 = product of:
          0.099512465 = sum of:
            0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099512465 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Windows Media Technologies
  7. Campos, F.M.: UNIMARC: the virtual format in the virtual age (1998) 0.02
    0.024878116 = product of:
      0.049756233 = sum of:
        0.049756233 = product of:
          0.099512465 = sum of:
            0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099512465 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Focuses on the history of the UNIMARC format which was designed as a communication tool among the various national formats used for computerized bibliographic records. Explains the function of UNIMARC and ISBDs in bringing together automated versions of catalogues without greatly compromising individual or local characteristics. Gives examples of European projects which have resulted in products which illustrate the value of UNIMARC and discusses its application to electronic media and future in international networks
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024335241 = product of:
      0.048670482 = sum of:
        0.048670482 = product of:
          0.097340964 = sum of:
            0.097340964 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097340964 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  9. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.024335241 = product of:
      0.048670482 = sum of:
        0.048670482 = product of:
          0.097340964 = sum of:
            0.097340964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097340964 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  10. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.024335241 = product of:
      0.048670482 = sum of:
        0.048670482 = product of:
          0.097340964 = sum of:
            0.097340964 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097340964 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024335241 = product of:
      0.048670482 = sum of:
        0.048670482 = product of:
          0.097340964 = sum of:
            0.097340964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097340964 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  12. Durand, J.J.: Making your MARC (1997) 0.02
    0.021768354 = product of:
      0.043536708 = sum of:
        0.043536708 = product of:
          0.087073416 = sum of:
            0.087073416 = weight(_text_:media in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087073416 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses some of the questions raised by school library media specialists but intended to help all those whose last cataloguing course was taken in library school before the technological revolution to make the most of the MARC record format. Covers necessary cataloguing tools and basic information needed to create an accurate MARC record, as well as successful additional information and some expectations of its future iuses. Emphasizes the importance of accurate MARC records if the online catalogue is to meet user needs, and be able to be merged with other catalogues. Also notes the MARC record's usefulness in streamlining activities such as circulation, use statistics, overdue notices, holding reports, bibliographies and inventories
  13. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02
    0.020858778 = product of:
      0.041717555 = sum of:
        0.041717555 = product of:
          0.08343511 = sum of:
            0.08343511 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08343511 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  14. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.019665845 = product of:
      0.03933169 = sum of:
        0.03933169 = product of:
          0.07866338 = sum of:
            0.07866338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07866338 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  15. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019665845 = product of:
      0.03933169 = sum of:
        0.03933169 = product of:
          0.07866338 = sum of:
            0.07866338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07866338 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  16. Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994) 0.02
    0.018658588 = product of:
      0.037317175 = sum of:
        0.037317175 = product of:
          0.07463435 = sum of:
            0.07463435 = weight(_text_:media in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07463435 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
  17. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.02
    0.018658588 = product of:
      0.037317175 = sum of:
        0.037317175 = product of:
          0.07463435 = sum of:
            0.07463435 = weight(_text_:media in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07463435 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
  18. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02
    0.017382314 = product of:
      0.03476463 = sum of:
        0.03476463 = product of:
          0.06952926 = sum of:
            0.06952926 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06952926 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  19. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.02
    0.017382314 = product of:
      0.03476463 = sum of:
        0.03476463 = product of:
          0.06952926 = sum of:
            0.06952926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06952926 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  20. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.02
    0.017207615 = product of:
      0.03441523 = sum of:
        0.03441523 = product of:
          0.06883046 = sum of:
            0.06883046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06883046 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 60
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…