Search (271 results, page 1 of 14)

0.06366206 = product of:
  0.12732412 = sum of:
    0.07832218 = weight(_text_:media in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07832218 = score(doc=286,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.35853422 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
    0.04900194 = sum of:
      0.023726176 = weight(_text_:research in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023726176 = score(doc=286,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.17831147 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.025275761 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025275761 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users

Date

22. 3.2002 8:51:28

Source

Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen

0.05685966 = product of:
  0.11371932 = sum of:
    0.09592469 = weight(_text_:media in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09592469 = score(doc=1558,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
    0.017794631 = product of:
      0.035589263 = sum of:
        0.035589263 = weight(_text_:research in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035589263 = score(doc=1558,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports on a survey of teenagers at a school in Edinburgh, Scotland, conducted as part of the Household Information System (HIS) project at Queen Margaret College. HIS has attempted to apply organizational models of information management to non organizational contexts such as households. Information management concepts have also been complemented by reference to research from sociology and media and cultural studies into the domestic consumption of technologies. Previous HIS research has suggested that notions of technological convergence proposed by producers and suppliers of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are not shared by consumers who prefer to keep their television and computing devioces separate. Television is most often associated with relaxation and entertainment, computing with work and education. However, there is some evidence that expertise with regard to new ICTs is the province of children rather than adults in many homes, a trend which may indicate as inversion of traditional patterns of knowledge dispersal in adult child relationships

0.055979453 = product of:
  0.111958906 = sum of:
    0.07913383 = weight(_text_:media in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07913383 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
    0.03282508 = product of:
      0.06565016 = sum of:
        0.06565016 = weight(_text_:research in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06565016 = score(doc=2552,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.49338657 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

I(nvestigates the constituents of a good research task, requiring students to construct meaning from a variety of resources. The study involved collaboration between a high school media specialist, 7 teachers, and a university faculty member in Michigan, USA. 6 research projects involving 387 students of all ability levels were observed to identify elements associated with meaningsful research. Data were collected from a questionnaire completed by all students and student and teacher interviews. elements found to be related to satisfaction with the research process and to satisfaction with achievement were: student choice of topic, group work, course related topics, clarity of goals and means of evaluation, and process instruction

0.049947117 = product of:
  0.09989423 = sum of:
    0.07913383 = weight(_text_:media in 3899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07913383 = score(doc=3899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 3899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3899)
    0.020760404 = product of:
      0.041520808 = sum of:
        0.041520808 = weight(_text_:research in 3899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041520808 = score(doc=3899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 3899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports on 4 experiments conducted at Sheffield University, Department of Information Studies, UK, into cognitive models which illuminate how people learn using electronic media. The experiments dealt with: learning strategies in an unconstrained electronic environment, in a hypertext environment, and in database searching, and matching and mismatching learning styles. Discusses the positive or negative implications for the design of electronic learning materials suggested by these experiments

Source

Electronic library and visual information research: Proceedings of the First ELVIRA Conference (ELVIRA 1), Electronic Library and Visual Information Research, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes, May 1994. Ed. by M. Collier u, K. Arnold

0.04845938 = product of:
  0.19383752 = sum of:
    0.19383752 = weight(_text_:media in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19383752 = score(doc=452,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.88732696 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Examines the assumption that people want to be presented with as many different media as are possible in a given application. Reports on an exploratory study designed to assess the media preferences og the 'person on the street' when presented with the choice of 7 different media combinations to find out some unknown thing in a public space. Findings suggests that people do not always prefer to access as many different media as are available. There was a bias toward having some media combination that includes graphics, but there was also some bias against having information presented using sound in a public space

0.046906825 = product of:
  0.09381365 = sum of:
    0.07913383 = weight(_text_:media in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07913383 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
    0.014679822 = product of:
      0.029359644 = sum of:
        0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359644 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports on a study of children's intentions, purposes, search terms, strategies, successes and breakdowns in accessing fiction. Data was gathered using naturalistic methods of persistent, intensive observation and questioning with children in several school library media centres in the USA, including 997 OPAC transactions. Analyzes the data and highlights aspects of the broader context of the system which may help in development of mechanisms for electronic access

Footnote

Contribution to a special issue devoted to papers read at the 1996 Electronic Access to Fiction research seminar at Copenhagen, Denmark

0.042811815 = product of:
  0.08562363 = sum of:
    0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067829 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
    0.017794631 = product of:
      0.035589263 = sum of:
        0.035589263 = weight(_text_:research in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035589263 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.

0.03791756 = product of:
  0.15167025 = sum of:
    0.15167025 = weight(_text_:media in 1547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15167025 = score(doc=1547,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.6942985 = fieldWeight in 1547, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1547)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Examines the problem of a compelling online news delivery system by focusing on how mass media audiences and online users differ in their assessment of news. It employed a 2-wave USA national survey to study the perception of interactivity in mass media and computer networks and its relationship to the assessment of news. The 1st wave looked a national probability sample, ahile the 2nd targeted viewers of NBC Nightly News who responded to the show via e-mail. NBC respondents rated mass media to be less interactive, while they rated computer communication more interactive than the national sample. The NBC group also rated mass media news less important and of lower quality than did the national sample. Interactivity ratings did not predict mass media credibility assessment for either group. However, respondents who defined interactivity as cybernetic feedback or who contacted NBC by e-mail rated computer communication to be more credible than thos who did not

0.03790644 = product of:
  0.07581288 = sum of:
    0.06394979 = weight(_text_:media in 285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06394979 = score(doc=285,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.29274195 = fieldWeight in 285, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=285)
    0.011863088 = product of:
      0.023726176 = sum of:
        0.023726176 = weight(_text_:research in 285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023726176 = score(doc=285,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.17831147 = fieldWeight in 285, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The Household Information Systems (HIS) project in Queen Margaret College was funded to explore the use of new media in a group of Edinburgh households (Davenport & Higgins, 1995). One of the motivations of the HIS 'programme' was to find a suitable theoretical and/or exploratory framework, which takes account of multiple aspects of behaviour surrounding technologies, and thus avoids assumptions about their role in information-seeking or other isolated activities. A focus on single activities would occlude knowledge of other motivations: bonding, killing time, defining boundaries. In Phase One, `information management' rather than `information seeking' was used as a conceptual framework, embracing work on the `life cycle' of ICTs as illustrated by Kopytoffs `biography of things' approach (1986), Johnson's cultural circuit (1986), research on households as micro-organisations by McCrone and his colleagues (1994), and work by Silverstone and others on ICTs in the home as tools for internal and external adaptation (Silverstone, 1994, Silverstone et al 1994). The `management' framework has been productive - Phase One allowed us to identify patterns of ICT acquisition and deployment in the home, and, more interestingly, structures of appropriation which reflect rules, roles and responsibilities in individual households. These constitute what may be called a `reproduction lattice' (adapting terminology used by Kling (1987) in his analysis of the `web of computing' in organisations), a structure which captures the political and cultural economy of a household. Phase One's findings are consistent with those of other researchers working in the area of domestic consumption of ICTs but a major limitation of the work is the homogeneous nature of the respondents. Among our Edinburgh 'household managers', internal culture was a more compelling explanation for use than technical functionality.

Source

Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen

0.03734287 = product of:
  0.07468574 = sum of:
    0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056524165 = score(doc=3671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
    0.018161573 = product of:
      0.036323145 = sum of:
        0.036323145 = weight(_text_:research in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036323145 = score(doc=3671,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The study of information needs has long be acknowlegded as one of the most important factors in the design of information services but has been hampered by the severe problem of designing user studies that will reliably measure them. Reviews the literature of previous research in this field, concluding that time and money are the chief constraints on information seeking behaviour. Describes a new observational technique for identifying the information needs of users and reports results of a small scale experiment to test the methodology. The observational technique involves the researcher being with the subject continuously throughout the day and observing their actions. The behaviour recorded was any action taken in order to answer a question. A small scale study was undertaken of 3 academics from the Psychology Department, University of Strathclyde, using the observational technique. The preferred technique of all the academics was to carry out their own research, followed by consultation with other individuals. One lecturer was a significantly heavier user of electronic media than the other two. The preferred physical locations of the information sources were personal collections and the University Library. One lecturer consistently used a wide range of sources while the other two strongly preferred to use personal contacts. Informal sources were found to be twice as popular as formal sources. A follow up questionnaire survey examined the possibility that previous training in the use of the library could explain the differences in the use of electronic information sources but results were found to be negative. Concludes that the new research tool developed for this type of study is both robust and likely to yield reliable information about user information needs

0.03734287 = product of:
  0.07468574 = sum of:
    0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056524165 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
    0.018161573 = product of:
      0.036323145 = sum of:
        0.036323145 = weight(_text_:research in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036323145 = score(doc=575,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This study details the activities and strategies that 11th grade students with high academic abilities used during their information seeking and use to complete class projects in a Persuasive Speech class. The study took place in a suburban high school in Maryland, and participants included 21 junior honors students, their teacher, and their library media specialist. Each student produced a 5-7-minute speech on a self-chosen topic. Conducted in the framework of qualitative research in a constructivist paradigm (E.G. Guba, & Y.S. Lincoln, 1998), the study used data collected from observations, individual interviews, and documents students produced for their projects - concept maps, paragraphs, outlines, and research journals. Interview and observation data were analyzed using the constant comparative method (B. Glaser & A. Strauss, 1967) with the help of QSR NVivo 2 (QSR International Pty Ltd, 2002); students' documents were analyzed manually. The findings show that students' understanding, strategies, and activities during information seeking and use were interactive and serendipitous and that students learned about their topics as they searched. The research suggests that high school honors students in an information-rich environment are especially confident with learning tasks requiring an exploratory mode of learning.

0.03679611 = product of:
  0.14718445 = sum of:
    0.14718445 = sum of:
      0.05871929 = weight(_text_:research in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05871929 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.08846516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08846516 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

0.035676513 = product of:
  0.071353026 = sum of:
    0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056524165 = score(doc=699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=699)
    0.01482886 = product of:
      0.02965772 = sum of:
        0.02965772 = weight(_text_:research in 699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02965772 = score(doc=699,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 699, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper is the second part of a two-part paper, which examines the transition to the electronic information era in academia. Seeks to establish from the published literature to what extent university researchers have accepted, and adapted to, the changes wrought in information activity by seemingly endless technological developments. Within the wider context of the impact of the changing information environment on each of the three clearly discernible components of academic research (the creation of knowledge and standards, the preservation of information, and the communication of knowledge and information to others), disciplinary-rooted differences in the conduct of research and their influence on information needs are identified, and the resulting inter- and intra-individual variations in researchers' information seeking behaviour are explored. Reviewing a large number of studies investigating the integration of electronic media into academic work, an attempt is made to paint the picture of academics' progressively harnessing the new technologies to scholarly information gathering endeavours, with the expressed hope of affording some insight into the directions and basic trends characterising the information activity of university faculty in an increasingly electronic environment.

0.035676513 = product of:
  0.071353026 = sum of:
    0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056524165 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
    0.01482886 = product of:
      0.02965772 = sum of:
        0.02965772 = weight(_text_:research in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02965772 = score(doc=700,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper is the first part of a two-part paper, which examines the transition to the electronic information era in academia. Seeks to establish from the published literature to what extent university researchers have accepted, and adapted to, the changes wrought in information activity by seemingly endless technological developments. Within the wider context of the impact of the changing information environment on each of the three clearly discernible components of academic research (the creation of knowledge and standards, the preservation of information, and the communication of knowledge and information to others), disciplinary-rooted differences in the conduct of research and their influence on information needs are identified, and the resulting inter- and intra- individual variations in researchers' information seeking behaviour are explored. Reviewing a large number of studies investigating the integration of electronic media into academic work, an attempt is made to paint the picture of academics' progressively harnessing the new technologies to scholarly information gathering endeavours, with the expressed hope of affording some insight into the directions and basic trends characterizing the information activity of university faculty in an increasingly electronic environment.

0.035676513 = product of:
  0.071353026 = sum of:
    0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056524165 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
    0.01482886 = product of:
      0.02965772 = sum of:
        0.02965772 = weight(_text_:research in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02965772 = score(doc=4244,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose The current understanding of serendipity is based primarily on studies employing westerners as the participants, and it remains uncertain whether or not this understanding would be pervasive under different cultures, such as in China. In addition, there is not a sufficient systematic investigation of context during the occurrence of serendipity in current studies. The purpose of this paper is to examine the above issues by conducting a follow-up empirical study with a group of Chinese scholars. Design/methodology/approach The social media application "WeChat" was employed as a research tool. A diary-based study was conducted and 16 participants were required to send to the researchers any cases of serendipity they encountered during a period of two weeks, and this was followed by a post-interview. Findings Chinese scholars experienced serendipity in line with the three main processes of: encountering unexpectedness, connection-making and recognising the value. An updated context-based serendipity model was constructed, where the role of context during each episode of experiencing serendipity was identified, including the external context (e.g. time, location and status), the social context and the internal context (e.g. precipitating conditions, sagacity/perceptiveness and emotion). Originality/value The updated context model provides a further understanding of the role played by context during the different processes of serendipity. The framework for experiencing serendipity has been expanded, and this may be used to classify the categories of serendipity.

0.029370818 = product of:
  0.11748327 = sum of:
    0.11748327 = weight(_text_:media in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11748327 = score(doc=595,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5378013 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This study focuses on the ways in which people define their source preferences in the context of seeking orienting information for nonwork purposes. The conceptual framework of the study combines ideas drawn from social phenomenology and information-seeking studies. The study utilizes Alfred Schutz's model describing the ways in which actors structure everyday knowledge into regions of decreasing relevance. It is assumed that this structuring based on the actor's interest at hand is also reflected in the ways in which an actor prefers information sources and channels. The concept of information source horizon is used to elicit articulations of source preferences. The empirical part of the study draws on interviews with 20 individuals active in environmental issues. Printed media (newspapers), the Internet, and broadcast media (radio, television) were preferred in seeking for orienting information. The major source preferences were content of information, and availability and accessibility. Usability of information sources, user characteristics such as media habits, and situational factors were mentioned less frequently as preference criteria.

0.028262082 = product of:
  0.11304833 = sum of:
    0.11304833 = weight(_text_:media in 2819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11304833 = score(doc=2819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 2819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2819)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1997) no.3, S.258-282

0.028262082 = product of:
  0.11304833 = sum of:
    0.11304833 = weight(_text_:media in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11304833 = score(doc=722,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

There is very little qualitative data on what impact the Internet is having on information seeking in the workplace. Using open-ended interviews, questionnaires and observation, the impact of the Internet on the British Media was assessed. The focus was largely on newspapers, with The Guardian being covered in some depth. Over 300 journalists and media librarians were surveyed. It was found that amongst traditional journalists use was light. Poor access to the Internet - and good access to other information resources - were largely the reasons for this. Of the journalists it was mainly the older and more senior journalists and the New Media journalists who used the Internet. Librarians were also significant users. Searching the World Wide Web was the principal Internet activity and use was generally conservative in character. Newspapers and official sites were favoured, and searches were mainly of a fact-checking nature. Email was used on a very limited scale and was not regarded as a serious journalistic tool. Non-users were partly put off by the Internet's potential for overloading them with information and its reputation for producing information of suspect quality. Users generally dismissed these concerns, dealing with potential overload and quality problems largely by using authoritative sites and exploiting the lower quality data where it was needed. Where the Internet has been used it has not been at the expense of other information sources or communication channels, but online hosts seem to be at most risk in the future.

0.024475683 = product of:
  0.09790273 = sum of:
    0.09790273 = weight(_text_:media in 3468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09790273 = score(doc=3468,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 3468, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3468)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Finding audiovisual material for reuse in new programs is an important activity for news producers, documentary makers, and other media professionals. Such professionals are typically served by an audiovisual broadcast archive. We report on a study of the transaction logs of one such archive. The analysis includes an investigation of commercial orders made by the media professionals and a characterization of sessions, queries, and the content of terms recorded in the logs. One of our key findings is that there is a strong demand for short pieces of audiovisual material in the archive. In addition, while searchers are generally able to quickly navigate to a usable audiovisual broadcast, it takes them longer to place an order when purchasing a subsection of a broadcast than when purchasing an entire broadcast. Another key finding is that queries predominantly consist of (parts of) broadcast titles and of proper names. Our observations imply that it may be beneficial to increase support for fine-grained access to audiovisual material, for example, through manual segmentation or content-based analysis.

0.022609666 = product of:
  0.090438664 = sum of:
    0.090438664 = weight(_text_:media in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.090438664 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

School library media quarterly. 23(1994) no.1, S.43-51