Search (3334 results, page 1 of 167)

0.2364429 = product of:
  0.3152572 = sum of:
    0.074075095 = product of:
      0.22222528 = sum of:
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22222528 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.01895682 = product of:
      0.03791364 = sum of:
        0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03791364 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.1975336 = product of:
  0.3950672 = sum of:
    0.0987668 = product of:
      0.29630038 = sum of:
        0.29630038 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29630038 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.29630038 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29630038 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.17284189 = product of:
  0.34568378 = sum of:
    0.086420946 = product of:
      0.25926283 = sum of:
        0.25926283 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25926283 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.25926283 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25926283 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.14815019 = product of:
  0.29630038 = sum of:
    0.074075095 = product of:
      0.22222528 = sum of:
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22222528 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

0.1234585 = product of:
  0.246917 = sum of:
    0.06172925 = product of:
      0.18518774 = sum of:
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18518774 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

0.0987668 = product of:
  0.1975336 = sum of:
    0.0493834 = product of:
      0.14815019 = sum of:
        0.14815019 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14815019 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14815019 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14815019 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.0946329 = product of:
  0.1892658 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=3587,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
    0.00838847 = product of:
      0.01677694 = sum of:
        0.01677694 = weight(_text_:research in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01677694 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A fascinating, research-based look at the impact of social media on businesses and consumers around the world, and what's in store for the future Social Media. You've heard the term, even if you don't use the tools. But just how big has social media become? Social media has officially surpassed pornography as the top activity on the Internet. People would rather give up their e-mail than their social network. It is so powerful that it is causing a macro shift in the way we live and conduct business. Brands can now be strengthened or destroyed by the use of social media. Online networking sites are being used as giant, free focus groups. Advertising is less effective at influencing consumers than the opinions of their peers. If you aren't using social media in your business strategy, you are already behind your competition. * Explores how the concept of "Socialnomics" is changing the way businesses produce, market, and sell, eliminating inefficient marketing and middlemen, and making products easier and cheaper for consumers to obtain * Learn how successful businesses are connecting with consumers like never before via Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other social media sites * A must-read for anyone wanting to learn about, and harness the power of social media, rather than be squashed by it * Author Erik Qualman is a former online marketer for several Top 100 brands and the current Global Vice President of Online Marketing for the world's largest private education firm Socialnomics is essential book for anyone who wants to understand the implications of social media, and how businesses can tap the power of social media to increase their sales, cut their marketing costs, and reach consumers directly.

Content

Introduction: It's a people-driven economy, stupid -- Word of mouth goes world of mouth -- Social media = preventative behavior -- Social media = braggadocian behavior -- Obama's success driven by social media -- I care more about what my neighbor thinks than what Google thinks -- Death of social schizophrenia -- Winners and losers in a 140-character world -- Next step for companies and the "glass house generation" -- Socialnomics summary.

LCSH

Social media

Subject

Social media

0.09266133 = product of:
  0.18532266 = sum of:
    0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067829 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.11749366 = sum of:
      0.07958002 = weight(_text_:research in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07958002 = score(doc=3612,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.59807485 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03791364 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

Source

Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase

0.09184693 = product of:
  0.18369386 = sum of:
    0.15826766 = weight(_text_:media in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15826766 = score(doc=673,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
    0.0254262 = product of:
      0.0508524 = sum of:
        0.0508524 = weight(_text_:research in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0508524 = score(doc=673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The appropriateness of utilising a training resource programme consisting of a mix of media and technologies for the training of cataloguing students is evaluated. The findings from reported research and evaluation of the training resource programme made it possible to identify advantages and disadvantages of using such a programme. The results of the research enabled the researcher to derive guidelines for the design and development of a training resource programme consisting of a mix of media and technologies. The use of media and technologies, in a training research programme for cataloguing training, can be utilised in training cataloguing students in contact classes, distance education as well as in-service training.

0.08244361 = product of:
  0.16488722 = sum of:
    0.07913383 = weight(_text_:media in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07913383 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
    0.08575339 = sum of:
      0.041520808 = weight(_text_:research in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041520808 = score(doc=1563,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.04423258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04423258 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

OCLC enlists the cooperation of the world's libraries to make the written record of humankind's cultural heritage more accessible through electronic media. Part of this goal can be accomplished through the application of the principles of knowledge organization. We believe that cultural artifacts are effectively lost unless they are indexed, cataloged and classified. Accordingly, OCLC has developed products, sponsored research projects, and encouraged the participation in international standards communities whose outcome has been improved library classification schemes, cataloging productivity tools, and new proposals for the creation and maintenance of metadata. Though cataloging and classification requires expert intellectual effort, we recognize that at least some of the work must be automated if we hope to keep pace with cultural change

Date

5. 5.2003 9:22:09

0.07971327 = product of:
  0.15942654 = sum of:
    0.13845536 = weight(_text_:media in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13845536 = score(doc=2015,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.6338049 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
    0.020971177 = product of:
      0.041942354 = sum of:
        0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041942354 = score(doc=2015,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - This article aims to report on research conducted inside British national media organisations. The research was designed to investigate the impact on the working practices of journalists of the process of production convergence - the trend towards news reporting in more than one medium in formerly single-medium organisations. The article describes the changes that are taking place and the ways journalists are reacting to them. Design/methodology/approach - Interviews were conducted with 20 journalists during 2002 and 2003. The interviews were with journalists working in newsrooms at the BBC, Sky News, The Guardian and the Financial Times. Findings - The data show that while multimedia news is becoming well established, the multimedia journalist has been slow to arrive. This is because of the pressures that multi-media working adds to the journalist's daily routine and a concern over the impact on the quality of output. Research limitations/implications - The media environment is evolving rapidly and research findings on this topic quickly go out of date, but the findings presented here offer valuable insights into the news production processes operating in British national media organisations and the ways journalists are adapting to, and are likely to continue to adapt to, changes in production technologies and changed systems of working. Originality/value - The paper is the first to focus on journalistic practice in a converging media environment.

0.07672632 = product of:
  0.15345263 = sum of:
    0.135658 = weight(_text_:media in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.135658 = score(doc=2585,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.62099946 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
    0.017794631 = product of:
      0.035589263 = sum of:
        0.035589263 = weight(_text_:research in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035589263 = score(doc=2585,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to ask why the libraries and the computer and media centres of German universities are picking up too little to improve the conditions for learning, teaching and research. Design/methodology/approach - With the founding of the Information, Communication and Media Center/Informations-, Kommunikations- und Medienzentrums (ICMC/IKMZ), the central services of the Brandenburg Technical University of Cottbus (BTU Cottbus) library, computer center, multimedia center and administrative data processing were combined on a common management level, and the prerequisites for the development of integrated information management were created. Findings - On this basis the following goal was set: the realization of more efficient organizational structures for a broad spectrum of customer- and service-oriented information, communications and media (ICM) offers for research, teaching and administration. Originality/value - The paper gives an overview of German discussion on the convergence of services, and presents the ICMC/IKMZ of Cottbus University as an example of a converged institution.

0.07523431 = product of:
  0.15046862 = sum of:
    0.09790273 = weight(_text_:media in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09790273 = score(doc=1397,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
    0.05256588 = sum of:
      0.020971177 = weight(_text_:research in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020971177 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.0315947 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0315947 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The "Screen Design Manual" provides designers of interactive media with a practical working guide for preparing and presenting information that is suitable for both their target groups and the media they are using. It describes background information and relationships, clarifies them with the help of examples, and encourages further development of the language of digital media. In addition to the basics of the psychology of perception and learning, ergonomics, communication theory, imagery research, and aesthetics, the book also explores the design of navigation and orientation elements. Guidelines and checklists, along with the unique presentation of the book, support the application of information in practice.

Date

22. 3.2008 14:29:25

0.073681526 = product of:
  0.14736305 = sum of:
    0.12639187 = weight(_text_:media in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12639187 = score(doc=32,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5785821 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
    0.020971177 = product of:
      0.041942354 = sum of:
        0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041942354 = score(doc=32,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Over the next decade, research in school library media should focus explicitly on the relationship between library media programs and student learning. Attention to this topic has been a growing theme in the field's research for decades, and a number of factors argue for making it even more central in the coming years: the increasing emphasis on learning and achievement throughout education; the deepening appreciation for the library media specialist's various roles as they relate to this emphasis on learning; the emergence of electronic information resources that highlight the relationship between learning and information use as never before; and the publication of the Information Literacy Skills for Student Learning in Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning (American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology [AASL and AECT], 1998). These statements of learning outcomes related to information use tie the school library media field directly to learning as nothing has done before. They provide both a rationale and a conceptual framework for studying students' interactions with information as the kind of authentic learning that is the goal of education in the twenty-first century.

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Research questions for the twenty-first century

0.06963858 = product of:
  0.13927716 = sum of:
    0.11748327 = weight(_text_:media in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11748327 = score(doc=622,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5378013 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
    0.021793885 = product of:
      0.04358777 = sum of:
        0.04358777 = weight(_text_:research in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04358777 = score(doc=622,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.3275791 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS) is a new medium that enriches people's personal communication with their business partners, friends, or family. Following the success of Short Message Services, MMS has the potential to be the next mobile commerce killer application which is useful and popular among consumers; however, little is known about why people intend to accept and use it. Building upon the motivational theory and media richness theory, the research model captures both extrinsic (e.g., perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and intrinsic (e.g., perceived enjoyment) motivators as well as perceived media richness to explain user intention to use MMS. An online survey was conducted and 207 completed questionnaires were collected. By integrating the motivation and the media richness perspectives, the research model explains 65% of the variance. In addition, the results present strong support to the existing theoretical links as well as to those newly hypothesized in this study. Implications from the current investigation for research and practice are provided.

0.06843873 = product of:
  0.13687746 = sum of:
    0.12639187 = weight(_text_:media in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12639187 = score(doc=5162,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5785821 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
    0.010485589 = product of:
      0.020971177 = sum of:
        0.020971177 = weight(_text_:research in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020971177 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Kaye and Johnson are interested in the effect of interaction with the Internet on time spent with more traditional media by persons with a strong interest in politics, a topic on which previous research has provided conflicting results. They posted a survey on the Web requesting respondents from within the United States which was advertised in politically oriented newsgroups, political chat rooms, politically oriented web sites, and posted on 40 search services and which collected data from the responding convenience sample of 442 in 2000 and 307 in 1996. Respondents were asked about change in their time spent with traditional media, as well as their trust in government, self efficacy, interest in politics, reliance on traditional sources, reliance on the web, other internet based electronic information sources, and their demographic characteristics. Over the time period female respondents increased from one quarter to one third. The average age increased by 10.8 years, and those reporting a high level of trust in government increased from 11.9% to 35.2%. Reported high self efficacy rose from 44.7% to 74%. Internet users are spending significantly less time reading news magazines in the second survey, and while the difference in television viewing is not significantly different, the decrease in radio listening for political information is. Respondents also report spending significantly less time talking about politics in 2000. About one half the respondents report spending less time with traditional media while the other half claim the internet has not effected their use of these sources.

0.067009754 = product of:
  0.13401951 = sum of:
    0.11304833 = weight(_text_:media in 3462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11304833 = score(doc=3462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 3462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3462)
    0.020971177 = product of:
      0.041942354 = sum of:
        0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 3462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041942354 = score(doc=3462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 3462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

0.06633627 = product of:
  0.13267253 = sum of:
    0.11191213 = weight(_text_:media in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11191213 = score(doc=796,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5122984 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
    0.020760404 = product of:
      0.041520808 = sum of:
        0.041520808 = weight(_text_:research in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041520808 = score(doc=796,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A relatively new phenomenon in school libraries is the organization of books by the reading levels associated with reading incentive programs such as Accelerated Reader and Reading Counts. There is a body of research on the effects of reading incentive programs on variables related to reading ability and motivation but currently there is no research on the characteristics of the school libraries that use reading levels as an alternative classification scheme for shelf arrangement. This article reports the results of a survey of P-12 media specialists in Kentucky who identified their libraries as arranged by reading level. Analysis of results provides information on the demographic characteristics of these libraries and media specialists' rationale for organizing their library collections in this way.

0.06545402 = product of:
  0.13090804 = sum of:
    0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067829 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
    0.06307905 = sum of:
      0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02516541 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03791364 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The German information science community - with the support of the two main funding agencies in Germany - will develop a scientific portal, vascoda, for cross-searching distributed metadata collections. In platitudinous words, one of the services of vascoda is going to be a ldquoGooglerdquo-like search for the academic community, an easy to use, yet sophisticated search-engine to supply information on high-quality resources from different media and technical environments. Reaching this objective requires considerable standardisation activity amongst the main players to harmonise the already existing services (e.g. regarding metadata, protocols, etc.). The co-operation amongst the participants including both of the funding agencies is creating a unique team-work situation in Germany thus strengthening the information science community.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.06503299 = product of:
  0.13006598 = sum of:
    0.11748327 = weight(_text_:media in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11748327 = score(doc=5933,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.5378013 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
    0.012582705 = product of:
      0.02516541 = sum of:
        0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516541 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

We present a general framework for cross-media annotation that can be used to support the many different forms and uses of annotation. Specifically, we discuss the need for digital annotation of printed materials and describe how various technologies for digitally augmented paper can be used in support of work practices. The state of the art in terms of both commercial and research solutions is described in some detail, with an analysis of the extent to which they can support both the writing and reading activities associated with annotation. Our framework is based on an extension of the information server that was developed within the Paper++ project to support enhanced reading. It is capable of handling both formal and informal annotation across printed and digital media, exploiting a range of technologies for information capture and display. A prototype demonstrator application for mammography is presented to illustrate both the functionality of the framework and the status of existing technologies.