Search (4871 results, page 1 of 244)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.32
    0.31853622 = product of:
      0.42471495 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30451685 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30451685 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.048422787 = product of:
          0.096845575 = sum of:
            0.096845575 = weight(_text_:methods in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096845575 = score(doc=2514,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.53303653 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.24
    0.241006 = product of:
      0.32134134 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21532592 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21532592 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.034240082 = product of:
          0.068480164 = sum of:
            0.068480164 = weight(_text_:methods in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068480164 = score(doc=400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.23
    0.22910213 = product of:
      0.3054695 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21532592 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21532592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.018368276 = product of:
          0.03673655 = sum of:
            0.03673655 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03673655 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.19
    0.19140083 = product of:
      0.38280165 = sum of:
        0.09570041 = product of:
          0.28710124 = sum of:
            0.28710124 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28710124 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28710124 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28710124 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.19
    0.19140083 = product of:
      0.38280165 = sum of:
        0.09570041 = product of:
          0.28710124 = sum of:
            0.28710124 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28710124 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28710124 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28710124 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.19
    0.18814608 = product of:
      0.37629217 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30451685 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30451685 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  7. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17
    0.16747575 = product of:
      0.3349515 = sum of:
        0.08373787 = product of:
          0.2512136 = sum of:
            0.2512136 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2512136 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2512136 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2512136 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  8. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.14
    0.14355062 = product of:
      0.28710124 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21532592 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21532592 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  9. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.14
    0.14355062 = product of:
      0.28710124 = sum of:
        0.07177531 = product of:
          0.21532592 = sum of:
            0.21532592 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21532592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21532592 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21532592 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  10. Houser, J.: ¬The visual vocabulary of the graphical environment (1996) 0.12
    0.12477004 = product of:
      0.24954008 = sum of:
        0.21892628 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21892628 = score(doc=4755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.7316029 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
        0.030613795 = product of:
          0.06122759 = sum of:
            0.06122759 = weight(_text_:22 in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06122759 = score(doc=4755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies the visual vocabulary of use in the graphic user interface (GUI) environment. Offers tips on using GUIs to the user's advantage, highlighting areas which frequently cause confusion. Presents a thesaurus of GUI terms
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:03:57
  11. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Sherman, R.J.: ¬The electronic book (1993) 0.10
    0.10371145 = product of:
      0.2074229 = sum of:
        0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17514104 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
        0.032281857 = product of:
          0.064563714 = sum of:
            0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064563714 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Electronic Book (EB) standard developed by the Sony Corporation. It defines compatibility with ISO 9660, the international standard for file structures on CD-ROM. The EB standard defines search methods according to word search, endword search, keyword search, menu search, multi search, graphic search and linking. Provides a summary of EB players covering the Sony DD1-EX, DD8, DD-DR1 and Panasonic KXEBP1. Discusses EB software
  14. Rowbotham, J.: Librarians - architects of the future? (1999) 0.10
    0.09981604 = product of:
      0.19963208 = sum of:
        0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17514104 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the reasons why librarians should be at the heart of Internet site development. There are two distinct ways in which librarians can most effectively contribute to this medium. The first is by getting involved in information architecture. This new discipline requires skills such as expertise in search techniques and navigational logic, and generally involves the librarian working closely with graphic designers to create a firm foundation for the site. The second area is the role librarians can play in the structuring of the data which drives the site (data management).
    Date
    21. 1.2007 14:22:02
  15. Percival, J.M.: Graphic interfaces and online information (1990) 0.09
    0.09288256 = product of:
      0.37153023 = sum of:
        0.37153023 = weight(_text_:graphic in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37153023 = score(doc=5709,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            1.2415713 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the growing importance of the graphic user interface, and describes an evaluation of Apple's HyperCard package as a potential interface to electronic mail and on-line commercial data bases
  16. Dyson, M.C.: How do you describe a symbol? : the problem involved in retrieving symbols from a database (1992) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies the need for a suitable information system for retrieving images from a database. Various search objectives are described which cannot be met by current retrieval methods. A number of approaches to the problem are discussed and the advantages of a flexible classification system are highlighted. By analysing the formal attributes of symbols, a classification structure is derived which starts with a division into graphic, semantic and bibliographic dimensions. 2 experimental tasks are used to examine user's perceptions of the features of symbols. These results can be used to fill in the detailed descriptions in the classification system
  17. Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.
  18. Taghva, K.; Borsack, J.; Condit, A.: Evaluation of model-based retrieval effectiveness with OCR text (1996) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on experiments with retrieval from OCR-generated text using systems based on standard models of retrieval. Shows that average precision and recall is not affected by OCR errors across systems for several collections. Both the actual and the simulation experiments include full text and abstract length documents. The ranking and feedback methods associated with the retrieval models are generally not robust enough to deal with OCR errors. OCR errors and garbage strings generated from the mistranslation of graphic objects increase the size of the index significantly. Describes the problems of applying OCR text within an information retrieval environment and offers solutions
  19. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.09
    0.090214625 = product of:
      0.18042925 = sum of:
        0.10946314 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10946314 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.36580145 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
        0.07096612 = sum of:
          0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040352322 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191016 = queryNorm
              0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.030613795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030613795 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191016 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  20. Popping, R.; Roberts, C.W.: Network approaches in text analysis (1997) 0.09
    0.08988928 = product of:
      0.17977856 = sum of:
        0.13135578 = weight(_text_:graphic in 7853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13135578 = score(doc=7853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.43896174 = fieldWeight in 7853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7853)
        0.048422787 = product of:
          0.096845575 = sum of:
            0.096845575 = weight(_text_:methods in 7853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096845575 = score(doc=7853,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.53303653 = fieldWeight in 7853, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last decade a broad spectrum of text analysis methods have been developed. One class of these involves the building of network-depictions of texts. At present there are 4 primary approaches within this class: network evaluation, amp analysis, knowledge graphing, and functional depiction. The first two of these approaches are quantitative text analysis methods, in that they were developed to yield statistical inferences about text populations. The latter 2 approaches are qualitative, in that they offer methods whereby texts can be 'simplified', not into a concise statistical model, but into a generalized graphic representation. This paper provides brief introductions to the 4 methods, as well as to computer programs developed for each

Languages

Types

  • el 135
  • b 37
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications