Search (5723 results, page 2 of 287)

  1. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  2. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  3. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  4. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.11962552 = product of:
      0.23925105 = sum of:
        0.05981276 = product of:
          0.17943828 = sum of:
            0.17943828 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17943828 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17943828 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17943828 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  5. Dyson, M.; Box, H.; Twyman, M.: ¬The perception of symbols on screen and methods of retrieval from a database (1994) 0.12
    0.11552743 = product of:
      0.23105486 = sum of:
        0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17514104 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
        0.05591382 = product of:
          0.11182764 = sum of:
            0.11182764 = weight(_text_:methods in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11182764 = score(doc=942,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.6154976 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a 2 year research project on symbols carried out by Reading University, Department of Typography and Graphic Communication. The research is divided into 2 parts: the perception of symbols and their legibility or discriminability; and methods of retrieval of symbols from image databases containing symbols. The aim of the research is to provide a useful basis for future work on the automatic recognition of symbols and their components and on methods if image enhancement
  6. Wainer, H.: Picturing the uncertain world : how to understand, communicate, and control uncertainty through graphical display (2009) 0.11
    0.11404774 = product of:
      0.22809549 = sum of:
        0.19581363 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19581363 = score(doc=1451,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.65436554 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.032281857 = product of:
          0.064563714 = sum of:
            0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064563714 = score(doc=1451,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In his entertaining and informative book "Graphic Discovery", Howard Wainer unlocked the power of graphical display to make complex problems clear. Now he's back with Picturing the Uncertain World, a book that explores how graphs can serve as maps to guide us when the information we have is ambiguous or incomplete. Using a visually diverse sampling of graphical display, from heartrending autobiographical displays of genocide in the Kovno ghetto to the 'Pie Chart of Mystery' in a "New Yorker" cartoon, Wainer illustrates the many ways graphs can be used - and misused - as we try to make sense of an uncertain world. "Picturing the Uncertain World" takes readers on an extraordinary graphical adventure, revealing how the visual communication of data offers answers to vexing questions yet also highlights the measure of uncertainty in almost everything we do. Are cancer rates higher or lower in rural communities? How can you know how much money to sock away for retirement when you don't know when you'll die? And where exactly did nineteenth-century novelists get their ideas? These are some of the fascinating questions Wainer invites readers to consider. Along the way he traces the origins and development of graphical display, from William Playfair, who pioneered the use of graphs in the eighteenth century, to instances today where the public has been misled through poorly designed graphs. We live in a world full of uncertainty, yet it is within our grasp to take its measure. Read "Picturing the Uncertain World" and learn how.
    LCSH
    Uncertainty (Information theory) / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Graphic methods
    Subject
    Uncertainty (Information theory) / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Graphic methods
  7. Sherman, R.J.: ¬The electronic book (1993) 0.10
    0.10371145 = product of:
      0.2074229 = sum of:
        0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17514104 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
        0.032281857 = product of:
          0.064563714 = sum of:
            0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064563714 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Electronic Book (EB) standard developed by the Sony Corporation. It defines compatibility with ISO 9660, the international standard for file structures on CD-ROM. The EB standard defines search methods according to word search, endword search, keyword search, menu search, multi search, graphic search and linking. Provides a summary of EB players covering the Sony DD1-EX, DD8, DD-DR1 and Panasonic KXEBP1. Discusses EB software
  8. Rowbotham, J.: Librarians - architects of the future? (1999) 0.10
    0.09981604 = product of:
      0.19963208 = sum of:
        0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17514104 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the reasons why librarians should be at the heart of Internet site development. There are two distinct ways in which librarians can most effectively contribute to this medium. The first is by getting involved in information architecture. This new discipline requires skills such as expertise in search techniques and navigational logic, and generally involves the librarian working closely with graphic designers to create a firm foundation for the site. The second area is the role librarians can play in the structuring of the data which drives the site (data management).
    Date
    21. 1.2007 14:22:02
  9. Thesaurus for graphic materials I : subject terms (???) 0.10
    0.09790681 = product of:
      0.39162725 = sum of:
        0.39162725 = weight(_text_:graphic in 8050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39162725 = score(doc=8050,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            1.3087311 = fieldWeight in 8050, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8050)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This new edition enhances your ability to control graphic materials by providing an alternative to the terms found in LCSH. terms are authorized for use in MARC field 650. Provides thousands of additional subject headings and cross references for graphic materials. Covers a broad range of subjects depicted in still pictures. Includes guidelines for application and scope notes. Users: Graphic materials catalogers and researchers. Useful in libraries, archives, museums, broadcast organizations, news agencies, and any other organization maintaining large picture files that need to be indexed or organized by subject
    Footnote
    Replaces and updates LC Thesaurus for Graphic Materials: Topical Terms for Subject Access (1987)
  10. Percival, J.M.: Graphic interfaces and online information (1990) 0.09
    0.09288256 = product of:
      0.37153023 = sum of:
        0.37153023 = weight(_text_:graphic in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37153023 = score(doc=5709,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            1.2415713 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the growing importance of the graphic user interface, and describes an evaluation of Apple's HyperCard package as a potential interface to electronic mail and on-line commercial data bases
  11. Dyson, M.C.: How do you describe a symbol? : the problem involved in retrieving symbols from a database (1992) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies the need for a suitable information system for retrieving images from a database. Various search objectives are described which cannot be met by current retrieval methods. A number of approaches to the problem are discussed and the advantages of a flexible classification system are highlighted. By analysing the formal attributes of symbols, a classification structure is derived which starts with a division into graphic, semantic and bibliographic dimensions. 2 experimental tasks are used to examine user's perceptions of the features of symbols. These results can be used to fill in the detailed descriptions in the classification system
  12. Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.
  13. Taghva, K.; Borsack, J.; Condit, A.: Evaluation of model-based retrieval effectiveness with OCR text (1996) 0.09
    0.09074751 = product of:
      0.18149503 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
        0.028246626 = product of:
          0.056493253 = sum of:
            0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056493253 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on experiments with retrieval from OCR-generated text using systems based on standard models of retrieval. Shows that average precision and recall is not affected by OCR errors across systems for several collections. Both the actual and the simulation experiments include full text and abstract length documents. The ranking and feedback methods associated with the retrieval models are generally not robust enough to deal with OCR errors. OCR errors and garbage strings generated from the mistranslation of graphic objects increase the size of the index significantly. Describes the problems of applying OCR text within an information retrieval environment and offers solutions
  14. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.09
    0.090214625 = product of:
      0.18042925 = sum of:
        0.10946314 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10946314 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.36580145 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
        0.07096612 = sum of:
          0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040352322 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191016 = queryNorm
              0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.030613795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030613795 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191016 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  15. Popping, R.; Roberts, C.W.: Network approaches in text analysis (1997) 0.09
    0.08988928 = product of:
      0.17977856 = sum of:
        0.13135578 = weight(_text_:graphic in 7853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13135578 = score(doc=7853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.43896174 = fieldWeight in 7853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7853)
        0.048422787 = product of:
          0.096845575 = sum of:
            0.096845575 = weight(_text_:methods in 7853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096845575 = score(doc=7853,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.53303653 = fieldWeight in 7853, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last decade a broad spectrum of text analysis methods have been developed. One class of these involves the building of network-depictions of texts. At present there are 4 primary approaches within this class: network evaluation, amp analysis, knowledge graphing, and functional depiction. The first two of these approaches are quantitative text analysis methods, in that they were developed to yield statistical inferences about text populations. The latter 2 approaches are qualitative, in that they offer methods whereby texts can be 'simplified', not into a concise statistical model, but into a generalized graphic representation. This paper provides brief introductions to the 4 methods, as well as to computer programs developed for each
  16. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.09
    0.08881742 = product of:
      0.35526967 = sum of:
        0.35526967 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35526967 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38312992 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  17. Bruckmann, D.: Graphic materials and libraries (1988) 0.09
    0.08757052 = product of:
      0.35028207 = sum of:
        0.35028207 = weight(_text_:graphic in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35028207 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            1.1705647 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Trentin, G.: Graphic tools for knowledge representation and informal problem-based learning in professional online communities (2007) 0.09
    0.08749021 = product of:
      0.17498042 = sum of:
        0.15480426 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15480426 = score(doc=1463,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51732135 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.020176161 = product of:
          0.040352322 = sum of:
            0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040352322 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The use of graphical representations is very common in information technology and engineering. Although these same tools could be applied effectively in other areas, they are not used because they are hardly known or are completely unheard of. This article aims to discuss the results of the experimentation carried out on graphical approaches to knowledge representation during research, analysis and problem-solving in the health care sector. The experimentation was carried out on conceptual mapping and Petri Nets, developed collaboratively online with the aid of the CMapTool and WoPeD graphic applications. Two distinct professional communities have been involved in the research, both pertaining to the Local Health Units in Tuscany. One community is made up of head physicians and health care managers whilst the other is formed by technical staff from the Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene. It emerged from the experimentation that concept maps arc considered more effective in analyzing knowledge domain related to the problem to be faced (description of what it is). On the other hand, Petri Nets arc more effective in studying and formalizing its possible solutions (description of what to do to). For the same reason, those involved in the experimentation have proposed the complementary rather than alternative use of the two knowledge representation methods as a support for professional problem-solving.
  19. Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010) 0.09
    0.08749021 = product of:
      0.17498042 = sum of:
        0.15480426 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15480426 = score(doc=4117,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51732135 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
        0.020176161 = product of:
          0.040352322 = sum of:
            0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040352322 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    To enable and guide effective metadata creation it is essential to understand the structure and patterns of the activities of the community around the photographs, resources used, and scale and quality of the socially created metadata relative to the metadata and knowledge already encoded in existing knowledge organization systems. This article presents an analysis of Flickr member discussions around the photographs of the Library of Congress photostream in Flickr. The article also reports on an analysis of the intrinsic and relational quality of the photostream tags relative to two knowledge organization systems: the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (TGM) and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Thirty seven percent of the original tag set and 15.3% of the preprocessed set (after the removal of tags with fewer than three characters and URLs) were invalid or misspelled terms. Nouns, named entity terms, and complex terms constituted approximately 77% of the preprocessed set. More than a half of the photostream tags were not found in the TGM and LCSH, and more than a quarter of those terms were regular nouns and noun phrases. This suggests that these terms could be complimentary to more traditional methods of indexing using controlled vocabularies.
    Aid
    Thesaurus for Graphic Materials
  20. Meadow, C.T.: ¬A proposed method of measuring the utility of individual information retrieval tools (1996) 0.09
    0.08733903 = product of:
      0.17467806 = sum of:
        0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1532484 = score(doc=6611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
        0.021429656 = product of:
          0.042859312 = sum of:
            0.042859312 = weight(_text_:22 in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042859312 = score(doc=6611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new method of evaluating information retrieval systems by concentrating on individual tools in the context of their use, rather than systems as a whole. A tool is a command, its menu or graphic interface equivalent, or a move or stratagem. A user would render an assessment of the relative success of a small part of a search, and every tool used in that part would be credited with a contribution to the result, whether positive or negative. The cumulative scores would provide an assessment of the overall utility of the tool
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.1, S.22-34

Languages

Types

  • a 4871
  • m 492
  • el 261
  • s 215
  • x 47
  • b 44
  • r 30
  • i 27
  • ? 8
  • n 6
  • p 5
  • d 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications