-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.04
0.039735876 = product of:
0.07947175 = sum of:
0.07947175 = sum of:
0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0444101 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 42(2006) nos.3/4, S.65-95
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = product of:
0.1121973 = sum of:
0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1121973 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = product of:
0.1121973 = sum of:
0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1121973 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = product of:
0.1121973 = sum of:
0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1121973 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = product of:
0.1121973 = sum of:
0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1121973 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.019833868 = product of:
0.039667737 = sum of:
0.039667737 = product of:
0.07933547 = sum of:
0.07933547 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07933547 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.019833868 = product of:
0.039667737 = sum of:
0.039667737 = product of:
0.07933547 = sum of:
0.07933547 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07933547 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.017530829 = product of:
0.035061657 = sum of:
0.035061657 = product of:
0.070123315 = sum of:
0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070123315 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
MacDougall, S.: Signposts on the information superhighway : indexes and access (2000)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=6106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 6106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(2000) nos.3/4, S.47-60
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.014024663 = product of:
0.028049326 = sum of:
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.014024663 = product of:
0.028049326 = sum of:
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
