-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.11
0.111982204 = product of:
0.22396441 = sum of:
0.22396441 = sum of:
0.1538411 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1538411 = score(doc=4608,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7541979 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070123315 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.11
0.10749253 = product of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.10
0.095366105 = product of:
0.19073221 = sum of:
0.19073221 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084147975 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 2(1982) nos.1/2, S.121-125
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.09
0.094055966 = product of:
0.18811193 = sum of:
0.18811193 = sum of:
0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13902561 = score(doc=114,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.09
0.089585766 = product of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12307288 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.09
0.0867173 = product of:
0.1734346 = sum of:
0.1734346 = sum of:
0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12434828 = score(doc=601,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Clarke, R.I.: Cataloging research by design : a taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging (2018)
0.08
0.080619395 = product of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1191648 = score(doc=5188,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article asserts that many research questions (RQs) in cataloging reflect design-based RQs, rather than traditional scientific ones. To support this idea, a review of existing discussions of RQs is presented to identify prominent types of RQs, including design-based RQs. RQ types are then classified into a taxonomic framework and compared with RQs from the Everyday Cataloger Concerns project, which aimed to identify important areas of research from the perspective of practicing catalogers. This comparative method demonstrates the ways in which the research areas identified by cataloging practitioners reflect design RQs-and therefore require design approaches and methods to answer them.
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:14:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.8, S.683-701
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.08
0.07838754 = product of:
0.15677509 = sum of:
0.15677509 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=1934,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.8, S.894-902
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.08
0.07627986 = product of:
0.15255973 = sum of:
0.15255973 = sum of:
0.11749808 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11749808 = score(doc=190,freq=14.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.57602817 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.07
0.06850691 = product of:
0.13701382 = sum of:
0.13701382 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.06
0.05563023 = product of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.06
0.05563023 = product of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
-
Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008)
0.05
0.046630606 = product of:
0.09326121 = sum of:
0.09326121 = product of:
0.18652242 = sum of:
0.18652242 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18652242 = score(doc=786,freq=18.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.9144164 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The Intellectual and Professional World of Cataloging"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2008) no.3, S.17-24
-
Snow, K.: Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging (2017)
0.04
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = product of:
0.17585503 = sum of:
0.17585503 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17585503 = score(doc=5155,freq=16.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.86212003 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Definitions of "quality cataloging" may differ from cataloger to cataloger and from institution to institution. If an objective definition of quality is elusive, how can an institution assess the quality of cataloging work? This article discusses definitions of quality cataloging in the literature and different ways it has been evaluated and measured. Academic library catalogers' perceptions of quality cataloging will also be explored, as well as how these perceptions are formed. The article concludes by suggesting ways cataloging departments can approach the creation and evaluation of quality cataloging in an ethical manner.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.438-455
-
Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008)
0.04
0.038073726 = product of:
0.07614745 = sum of:
0.07614745 = product of:
0.1522949 = sum of:
0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1522949 = score(doc=251,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have always had to balance adherence to cataloging rules and authority files with creating cataloging that is current and relevant to users. That dilemma has been complicated in new ways because of user demands in the world of Web 2.0. Standardized cataloging is crucial for communication between computer systems, but patrons now have an expectation of social interaction on the Internet, as evidenced by the popularity of folksonomy. After a description of traditional subject cataloging and folksonomy, this article discusses several institutions where subject cataloging is still used, but where patron interaction is also encouraged. User-generated tags can coexist with controlled vocabulary such as subject headings.
-
Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984)
0.04
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = product of:
0.14211231 = sum of:
0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14211231 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
-
Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017)
0.04
0.035109267 = product of:
0.07021853 = sum of:
0.07021853 = product of:
0.14043707 = sum of:
0.14043707 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14043707 = score(doc=3871,freq=20.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6884854 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
-
Gardner, S.A.: ¬The changing landscape of contemporary cataloging (2008)
0.03
0.034756403 = product of:
0.06951281 = sum of:
0.06951281 = product of:
0.13902561 = sum of:
0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13902561 = score(doc=795,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Intended to contribute to the current dialogue about how the emerging information environment is impacting cataloging issues, this survey paper covers a broad range of topics, such as how search engines compare with integrated library systems, and includes some thoughts on how cataloging processes may evolve to continue to remain relevant. The author suggests that there is a need for significant changes in integrated library system interfaces and infrastructures as well as some changes in cataloging practice. The value of descriptive vs. non-descriptive elements in the catalog record and some pros and cons of the MARC format are covered.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2008) no.4, S.81-99
