-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.655-674
-
Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018)
0.05
0.048933513 = product of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.06280537 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06280537 = score(doc=4218,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3079 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
-
Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:22:49
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.1, S.24-36
-
Valentino, M.L.: Integrating metadata creation into catalog workflow (2010)
0.03
0.026922192 = product of:
0.053844385 = sum of:
0.053844385 = product of:
0.10768877 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=4160,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The University of Oklahoma Libraries recently undertook a project designed to integrate digital library metadata creation into the workflow of the Cataloging Department. This article examines the conditions and factors that led to the project's genesis, the proposed and revised workflows that were developed, the staff training efforts that accompanied implementation of the project, and the results and benefits obtained through the project's implementation. The project presented several challenges but resulted in an improved workflow, greater use of Cataloging Department resources, and more accurate and useful metadata while increasing the Library's capacity to support digitization efforts in a timely fashion.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) nos.6/7, S.541-550
-
Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011)
0.03
0.026922192 = product of:
0.053844385 = sum of:
0.053844385 = product of:
0.10768877 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.4, S.277-310
-
Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014)
0.03
0.026922192 = product of:
0.053844385 = sum of:
0.053844385 = product of:
0.10768877 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=1963,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.20-31
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Langford, G.; Lundgren, J.; Nakano, H.; O'Dell, A.J.; Shelton, T.: Managing bibliographic data quality in a consortial academic library : a case study (2016)
0.03
0.026922192 = product of:
0.053844385 = sum of:
0.053844385 = product of:
0.10768877 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=5133,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents a case study of quality management for print and electronic resource metadata, summarizing problems and solutions encountered by the Cataloging and Discovery Services Department in the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. The authors discuss national, state, and local standards for cataloging, automated and manual record enhancements for data, user feedback, and statewide consortial factors. Findings show that adherence to standards, proactive cleanup of data via manual processes and automated tools, collaboration with vendors and stakeholders, and continual assessment of workflows are key to the management of biblio-graphic data quality in consortial academic libraries.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.7, S.452-467
-
Derrot, S.; Koskas, M.: My fair metadata : cataloging legal deposit Ebooks at the National Library of France (2016)
0.03
0.026922192 = product of:
0.053844385 = sum of:
0.053844385 = product of:
0.10768877 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=5140,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- French law on digital legal deposit covers websites and online content as well as ebooks. It imposes no obligation to produce a bibliography, indexing being sufficient. But despite their innovative characteristics, ebooks are still books, and their metadata is closer to that of printed materials than to the web indexing. To set up an ebook deposit workflow, the BnF benefits from its experience with digital documents and its tradition of legal deposit. This is to present the questions that it faces when dealing with the cataloging of ebooks and the management of their metadata, and the solutions that are emerging.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.8, S.583-592
-
Carlson, S.; Seely, A.: Using OpenRefine's reconciliation to validate local authority headings (2017)
0.03
0.025122147 = product of:
0.050244294 = sum of:
0.050244294 = product of:
0.10048859 = sum of:
0.10048859 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10048859 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 2015, the Cataloging and Metadata Services department of Rice University's Fondren Library developed a process to reconcile four years of authority headings against an internally developed thesaurus. With a goal of immediate cleanup as well as an ongoing maintenance procedure, staff developed a "hack" of OpenRefine's normal Reconciliation function that ultimately yielded 99.6% authority reconciliation and a stable process for monthly data verification.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.1, S.1-11
-
Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013)
0.02
0.024826001 = product of:
0.049652003 = sum of:
0.049652003 = product of:
0.099304006 = sum of:
0.099304006 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099304006 = score(doc=677,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.48683268 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
-
Han, M.-J.K.; Ream-Sotomayor, N.E.; Lampron, P.; Kudeki, D.: "Making Metadata Maker" (2016)
0.02
0.023076165 = product of:
0.04615233 = sum of:
0.04615233 = product of:
0.09230466 = sum of:
0.09230466 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09230466 = score(doc=2883,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.45251876 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Cataloging and metadata operations in academic libraries are focusing on original cataloging of their unique and hidden collections that have not been available to users because of a lack of metadata. However, creating MARC format metadata is an expensive process; libraries need professional catalogers with appropriate experience and knowledge or must train staff to do the work. To improve the cataloging and metadata creation workflow, the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign Library developed a web application, Metadata Maker, which allows anyone to create metadata in four different formats, including MARC21 for an online public access catalog, regardless of their familiarity with metadata standards or systems that utilize the metadata. Released as an open source application, Metadata Maker supports diacritics and Unicode non-Roman language encoding, and creates metadata records that ensure discovery and access of unique library collections.
-
Riley, J.: Understanding metadata : what is metadata, and what is it for? (2017)
0.02
0.02220505 = product of:
0.0444101 = sum of:
0.0444101 = product of:
0.0888202 = sum of:
0.0888202 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0888202 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 55(2017) no.7/8, S.669-670 (Liz Woolcott).
-
Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: New approaches to subject indexing at the British Library (2017)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=5158,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The constantly changing metadata landscape means that libraries need to re-think their approach to standards and subject analysis, to enable the discovery of vast areas of both print and digital content. This article presents a case study from the British Library that assesses the feasibility of adopting FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) to selectively extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content, or implement FAST as a replacement for all LCSH in current cataloging workflows.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.549-559
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Nakano, H.; Langford, G.; Shelton, T.; Lundgren, J.; O'Dell, A.J.: Managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources (2017)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=5160,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents a case study of quality management issues for electronic resource metadata to assess the support of user tasks (find, select, and obtain library resources) and potential for increased efficiencies in acquisitions and cataloging workflows. The authors evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records (mostly vendor supplied) for e-resource collections as compared with records for the same collections in OCLC's WorldShare Collection Manager (WCM). Findings are that WCM records better support user tasks by containing more summaries and tables of contents; other checkpoints are largely comparable between the two source record groups. The transition to WCM records is discussed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.560-577
-
Chou, C.: Purpose-driven assessment of cataloging and metadata services : transforming broken links into linked data (2019)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=5280,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.2/3, S.135-165
-
Park, J.-R.; Tosaka, Y.: Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections : criteria, semantics, and mechanisms (2010)
0.02
0.01884161 = product of:
0.03768322 = sum of:
0.03768322 = product of:
0.07536644 = sum of:
0.07536644 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07536644 = score(doc=4163,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.8, S.696-715
-
Farneth, D.: How can we achieve GLAM? : Understanding and overcoming the challenges to integrating metadata across museums, archives, and libraries: Part 2 (2016)
0.02
0.01884161 = product of:
0.03768322 = sum of:
0.03768322 = product of:
0.07536644 = sum of:
0.07536644 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07536644 = score(doc=5130,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenherft: 'The present and future state of rare materials cataloging: an international perspective'.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.5/6, S.292-304
-
Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.601-623
-
Long, K.; Thompson, S.; Potvin, S.; Rivero, M.: ¬The "wicked problem" of neutral description : toward a documentation approach to metadata standards (2017)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=5146,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5146, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5146)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.3, S.107-128
-
Stein, A.; Applegate, K.J.; Robbins, S.: Achieving and maintaining metadata quality : toward a sustainable workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository (2017)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.644-666
