Search (3735 results, page 1 of 187)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Guard, A.: ¬An antidote for browsing : subject headings for fiction (1991) 0.16
    0.1619803 = product of:
      0.3239606 = sum of:
        0.3239606 = sum of:
          0.21294501 = weight(_text_:headings in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21294501 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.8573571 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
          0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1110156 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:00
  2. OCLC/LC fiction headings project : too little, too late? (1992) 0.16
    0.1619803 = product of:
      0.3239606 = sum of:
        0.3239606 = sum of:
          0.21294501 = weight(_text_:headings in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21294501 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.8573571 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
          0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1110156 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:14
  3. Hoffmann, G.: Hebrew subject headings : development and implementation at Bar-Ilan University (1991/92) 0.15
    0.14679378 = product of:
      0.29358757 = sum of:
        0.29358757 = sum of:
          0.23807977 = weight(_text_:headings in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23807977 = score(doc=3014,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.9585544 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
          0.0555078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0555078 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Hebrew subject headings developed by the staff of the Hebrew Cataloguing Department, Bar-Ilan Univ. Library, Israel. The history of the development of the subject headings is followed by a discussion of how the library began assigning subject headings. Discusses the problems of translating and adapting LCSH and creating new subject headings in Hebrew
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:02:44
  4. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.14
    0.14173277 = product of:
      0.28346553 = sum of:
        0.28346553 = sum of:
          0.18632689 = weight(_text_:headings in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18632689 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.75018746 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09713865 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Tarszkiewicz, B.: Haslo korporatywne - Co? Kiedy? Jak? (1995) 0.14
    0.14173277 = product of:
      0.28346553 = sum of:
        0.28346553 = sum of:
          0.18632689 = weight(_text_:headings in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18632689 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.75018746 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.09713865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09713865 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Corporate subject headings - what? when? where?
    Source
    Poradnik bibliotekarza. 1995, no.10, S.22-26
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.13
    0.13374656 = product of:
      0.26749313 = sum of:
        0.26749313 = sum of:
          0.2258623 = weight(_text_:headings in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2258623 = score(doc=1333,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.9093645 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    n this article, we report on the first large-scale study of end-user understanding of subject headings. Our objectives were to determine the extent to which children and adults understood subdivided subject headings and to suggest improvements for improving understanding of subject headings. The 1991 Library of Congress Subject Subdivisions Conference suggested standardizing the order of subject subdivisions for the purpose of simplifying subject cataloging, which served as the impetus for the study. We demonstrated that adults understood subject headings better than children; however, both adults and children assigned correct meanings to less than half of the subject headings they examined. Neither subject heading context nor subdivision order had an effect on understanding. Based on our findings, we challenge the library community to make major changes to the Library of Congress Subject Headings system that have the potential to increase end-user understanding of subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Alvarado, R.U.: Cataloging Pierre Bourdieu's books (1994) 0.12
    0.11861667 = product of:
      0.23723334 = sum of:
        0.23723334 = sum of:
          0.19560249 = weight(_text_:headings in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19560249 = score(doc=894,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.7875328 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Subject headings do not always adequately express the subject content of books and other library materials. Whether due to cataloguer error or inadequacy in the authority list, this deficiency makes it difficult for users to access information. In an attempt to solve this problem, the study evaluated the adequacy of the LoC Subject Headings assigned to the 23 books of Pierre Bourdieu, whose philosophical ideas were judged likely to form a good test of the ability of the subject headings to reflect the ideas proposed by the author. The study examined the subject headings given to 22 books, and their translations into English, Spanish, Portuguese, and German, comprising 88 records in OCLC as of Dec 91. It was found that most of the books received headings not corresponding to their content, as the headings were assigned from the functionalist paradigm. In general, LCSHs ignore the conceptual categories of other paradigms, do not match the current vocabulary used by social scientists, and are ideologically biased
  8. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.11
    0.11453737 = product of:
      0.22907475 = sum of:
        0.22907475 = sum of:
          0.15057486 = weight(_text_:headings in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15057486 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.606243 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.07849988 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07849988 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the developments of the Statistical System for Subject Designation (SSSD): a syntactical system for subject designation for libraries in Croatia, based on the construction of subject headings in agreement with the theory of the sentence nature of subject headings. The discussion is preceded by a brief summary of theories underlying basic principles and fundamental rules of the alphabetical subject catalogue
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  9. Pathak, L.P.: Sociology schedule in the UDC : filiatory structure, terminology, categorization and concept representation (1995) 0.11
    0.110095344 = product of:
      0.22019069 = sum of:
        0.22019069 = sum of:
          0.17855984 = weight(_text_:headings in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17855984 = score(doc=2885,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.7189158 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Attention is drawn to the inadequacies of the existing classification schemes as pointed out by individuals and groups concerned with classification research. The article is based on an earlier study by the author, which identified and arranged in a filiatory way the main concepts of sociology and determined their relative significance as headings in a classification scheme. The sociology schedule in the DDC was examined on the basis of 9 evaluation criteria, as e.g. arrangement of major categories, provision for main concepts, use of phrased headings instead of individual key terms, and scattering of related concepts in the schedule. It was found that a large number of the main concepts of sociology are either not represented in the schedule or mentioned in the scope note only along with the main headings. A table shows 100 main concepts of sociology arranged and classified within 10 major categories or sections, and their provision in the DDC. The study suggests that the DDC needs serious reconsideration with regard to the main headings/categories provided as class headings, terminology used for the concepts, the filiatory structure adopted, and the representation of the main concepts of sociology
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.148-158
  10. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.10
    0.10496657 = product of:
      0.20993315 = sum of:
        0.20993315 = sum of:
          0.16136383 = weight(_text_:headings in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16136383 = score(doc=3600,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.102153145 = sum of:
      0.08133772 = product of:
        0.24401315 = sum of:
          0.24401315 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24401315 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43417317 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020815425 = product of:
        0.04163085 = sum of:
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  12. Westmancoat, J.: ¬The new British Library Maps file : how to get the best from a Blaise search (1997) 0.10
    0.1012377 = product of:
      0.2024754 = sum of:
        0.2024754 = sum of:
          0.13309065 = weight(_text_:headings in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13309065 = score(doc=1629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5358482 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
          0.06938475 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06938475 = score(doc=1629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In July 1997 the first part of the major retrospective conversion programme on the British Library's Maps catalogue was completed. Discusses the scope of the enlarged file and outlines changes in search techniques, geographic headings and searching by data
    Date
    17. 1.1999 13:49:22
  13. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.10
    0.10066981 = product of:
      0.20133962 = sum of:
        0.20133962 = sum of:
          0.15970877 = weight(_text_:headings in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15970877 = score(doc=3602,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.10
    0.10066981 = product of:
      0.20133962 = sum of:
        0.20133962 = sum of:
          0.15970877 = weight(_text_:headings in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15970877 = score(doc=3837,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  15. Plaunt, C.; Norgard, B.A.: ¬An association-based method for automatic indexing with a controlled vocabulary (1998) 0.10
    0.098847225 = product of:
      0.19769445 = sum of:
        0.19769445 = sum of:
          0.16300207 = weight(_text_:headings in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16300207 = score(doc=1794,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.6562773 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
          0.034692377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034692377 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we describe and test a two-stage algorithm based on a lexical collocation technique which maps from the lexical clues contained in a document representation into a controlled vocabulary list of subject headings. Using a collection of 4.626 INSPEC documents, we create a 'dictionary' of associations between the lexical items contained in the titles, authors, and abstracts, and controlled vocabulary subject headings assigned to those records by human indexers using a likelihood ratio statistic as the measure of association. In the deployment stage, we use the dictiony to predict which of the controlled vocabulary subject headings best describe new documents when they are presented to the system. Our evaluation of this algorithm, in which we compare the automatically assigned subject headings to the subject headings assigned to the test documents by human catalogers, shows that we can obtain results comparable to, and consistent with, human cataloging. In effect we have cast this as a classic partial match information retrieval problem. We consider the problem to be one of 'retrieving' (or assigning) the most probably 'relevant' (or correct) controlled vocabulary subject headings to a document based on the clues contained in that document
    Date
    11. 9.2000 19:53:22
  16. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.09
    0.09016116 = product of:
      0.18032232 = sum of:
        0.18032232 = sum of:
          0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.131753 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  17. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.09
    0.09016116 = product of:
      0.18032232 = sum of:
        0.18032232 = sum of:
          0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.131753 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the literature of Qigong: a relaxation technique used to teach patients to control their heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and other involuntary functions through controlles breathing. All articles indexed in the MEDLINE CD-ROM database, between 1965 and 1995 were identified using 'breathing exercises' MeSH term. The articles were analyzed for geographical and language distribution and a ranking exercise enabled a core list of periodicals to be identified. In addition, the study shed light on the changing frequency of the MeSH terms and evaluated the research areas by measuring the information from these respective MeSH headings
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  18. Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985) 0.09
    0.09016116 = product of:
      0.18032232 = sum of:
        0.18032232 = sum of:
          0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.131753 = score(doc=363,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although the rules for descriptive cataloging have been recodified twice in the past twenty years, there never has been any kind of comprehensive theoretical code for subject headings, despite some suggestions for a code over the years. This essay explains the need for a code, provides historical background, and presents some broad proposals as to the philosophy, structure, and form of the code and what the code should cover. Included is the relation between the proposed code and the Library of Congress' 1984 Subject Cataloging Manual.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:01
  19. Henttonen, P.: Bibliographic subject headings as access points to archival sources (2014) 0.09
    0.09016116 = product of:
      0.18032232 = sum of:
        0.18032232 = sum of:
          0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.131753 = score(doc=1460,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=1460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines whether subject headings in a bibliographic description could be used to direct users to relevant archival sources: a publication about a subject is likely to cite archival sources that are related to the subject. In the light of the data collected for the paper this approach might work in case of some keywords. However, there are also problems, like finding the optimal level the user should be directed to in the archival hierarchy, and the lack of information in archival persistent identifiers (PIDs).
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Maurer, M.B.; Shakeri, S.: Disciplinary differences : LCSH and keyword assignment for ETDs from different disciplines (2016) 0.09
    0.09016116 = product of:
      0.18032232 = sum of:
        0.18032232 = sum of:
          0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.131753 = score(doc=5122,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
          0.048569325 = weight(_text_:22 in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048569325 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research concerns the frequency of the assignment of author-supplied keyword strings and cataloger supplied subject heading strings within a library catalog. The results reveal that, on average, more author-assigned keywords and more cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings were assigned to works emerging from the arts & humanities than to works emerging from the social sciences and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. STEM disciplines in particular received a lower amount of topical metadata, in part because of the under-assignment of name/title, geographical, and corporate subject headings. These findings reveal how librarians could increase their understanding of how topical access is functioning within academic disciplines.
    Date
    17. 3.2019 18:04:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 81
  • b 36
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes