Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Shelflisting music : guidelines for use with the Library of Congress Classification: M (2008) 0.05
    0.050986957 = product of:
      0.15296087 = sum of:
        0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04275627 = score(doc=4238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
        0.09951117 = weight(_text_:congress in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09951117 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.63245976 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Imprint
    Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press /Music Library Association
  2. Zhao, L.: Save space for "newcomers" : analyzing problems in book number assignment under the LCC system (2004) 0.05
    0.047921974 = product of:
      0.107824445 = sum of:
        0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015116624 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=3081,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049755584 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.032258797 = product of:
          0.064517595 = sum of:
            0.064517595 = weight(_text_:problems in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064517595 = score(doc=3081,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.47391602 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    With more than a million books published each year, thousands of books will be cataloged and shelved in libraries. Assigning book numbers efficiently and balancing the distribution of main entries over the LC Cutter Table entries have become critical issues for shelving later entries in libraries using the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system. This paper aims to explore and discuss the problems in assigning book numbers (Cutter numbers) to printed materials under the LCC System. The existing problems have blocked or invaded the usage of some numbers and letters ruled by the LC Cutter Table. The reason is either not following the LC Cutter Table well, or confusion in using the Table. Directly downloading the LC record to the local database adds more questions to the issue.
  3. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.05
    0.046822555 = product of:
      0.10535075 = sum of:
        0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030233247 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.011955625 = weight(_text_:of in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011955625 = score(doc=125,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049755584 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.2, S.123-133
  4. Bettella, C.; Capodaglio, C.; Ramous, C.; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy) (2009) 0.03
    0.03276737 = product of:
      0.09830211 = sum of:
        0.031868644 = weight(_text_:library in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031868644 = score(doc=3271,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36746684 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
        0.019523453 = weight(_text_:of in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019523453 = score(doc=3271,freq=60.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.37852538 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
              7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
                60.0 = termFreq=60.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
        0.046910014 = weight(_text_:congress in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046910014 = score(doc=3271,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2981444 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The ongoing project to revise the arrangement of the open shelves library collections occasioned a historiographic account of the implementation phases of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), subclasses B-BJ - Philosophy and Psychology, at the Library of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Padua (Italy). The schema was adopted as a collection shelving and location device since the Library institution in 1997. The LCC international acknowledgement and the neutral framework of the schema have undoubtedly played a role of driving factors at the first stage of the selection process. However, the implementation of the classification scheme had to consider critical issues like the shortage of the library area, the selection criteria of the appropriate bibliographic material, as well as the effort to settle and tailor the original schema to the specific needs of the library collections and its end-users. The purpose of this paper is twofold: from one hand, we aim to examine in detail each stage of the implementation project in order to provide a preliminary impact evaluation of the classification schema both on the collections management and development and on the research practices of the local users community; from the other, we intend to highlight the principal factors that have implied a sort of declassification process of the system itself. In conclusion, we argue that the declassification of library collections can be read, from a bottom-up perspective, as index of vitality of the collections themselves, as well as a valuable basis for planning the next steps of the Library project.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
  5. Booth, P.F.: Together or apart : the problems of stock integration (1991) 0.03
    0.028164554 = product of:
      0.08449366 = sum of:
        0.035630222 = weight(_text_:library in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035630222 = score(doc=4898,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4108404 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
        0.017822394 = weight(_text_:of in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017822394 = score(doc=4898,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
        0.031041041 = product of:
          0.062082082 = sum of:
            0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062082082 = score(doc=4898,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Examines decisions made about the arrangement of stock in libraries and warns against rigid rules. Every library should have its own policy, taking into account the types of users and their particular information needs, and the kinds of information materials held and their particular characteristics
    Source
    Library work. 1991, no.13, S.7-8
  6. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.02
    0.024698323 = product of:
      0.074094966 = sum of:
        0.030001212 = product of:
          0.060002424 = sum of:
            0.060002424 = weight(_text_:headings in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060002424 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=339,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
        0.008821635 = weight(_text_:of in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008821635 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
  7. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.02
    0.022852022 = product of:
      0.06855606 = sum of:
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=913,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
        0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01764327 = score(doc=913,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
        0.01564067 = product of:
          0.03128134 = sum of:
            0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128134 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  8. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.02
    0.022158153 = product of:
      0.06647446 = sum of:
        0.037028015 = weight(_text_:library in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037028015 = score(doc=1858,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016040152 = score(doc=1858,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
  9. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.02
    0.019971455 = product of:
      0.05991436 = sum of:
        0.03491035 = weight(_text_:library in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03491035 = score(doc=344,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
        0.007128957 = weight(_text_:of in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007128957 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Colorado University at Boulder Libraries, Leonard H. Gemmill Engineering Library, USA, uses mobile compact shelving for its open stack collection. Describes the library collection, the shelves, configuration and equipment, capacity and use, maintenance and repairs, and the affect of power cuts and flooding. Discusses ths staff and users' reactions and the lessons learnt
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  10. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.02
    0.019575652 = product of:
      0.05872695 = sum of:
        0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02850418 = score(doc=31,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012347717 = score(doc=31,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The inspiration for categorising of fiction has been the observation that this kind of arrangement serves those clients who look for books by browsing the shelves. The evidence for this is that catgorisation has increased loans of fiction and helped clients to find older literature that current reviews have already left behind
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  11. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.02
    0.016185416 = product of:
      0.048556246 = sum of:
        0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01763606 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015279518 = score(doc=4660,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.01564067 = product of:
          0.03128134 = sum of:
            0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128134 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    In the last 10 years a number of libraries in the Netherlands have developed akternative shelf arrangements to the standard SISO system. A survey undertaken at Felde children's library following the implementation of an alternative arrangement showed that children had been unaware of the change. In 1989 the Nederlands Bibliothekk en Lektuur Centrum (Dutch Centre for Libraries and Reading) began developing a system based on trials at 15 libraries. Further implementations of the system should take account of developments with automated catalogues
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Almost as many systems as libraries: a study of alternative shelf arrangement schems
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  12. Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985) 0.01
    0.013438829 = product of:
      0.06047473 = sum of:
        0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040310998 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
        0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020163735 = score(doc=3326,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Imprint
    Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  13. Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971) 0.01
    0.011877713 = product of:
      0.053449705 = sum of:
        0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04275627 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 15(1971), S.479-491
  14. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf classification research : past, present, future? (1980) 0.01
    0.011758976 = product of:
      0.05291539 = sum of:
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=3498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
        0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01764327 = score(doc=3498,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Series
    University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library Science: occasional papers; no.146
  15. LeBlanc, J.: Classification and shelflisting as value added : some remarks on the relative worth and price of predictibility, serendipity, and depth of access (1995) 0.01
    0.011385583 = product of:
      0.051235124 = sum of:
        0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030546555 = score(doc=3667,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
        0.020688567 = weight(_text_:of in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020688567 = score(doc=3667,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    There seems to be general agreement in the library community that a predictably ordered system of classification, leading to easy browsability of a library collection either in the stacks or in an OPAC, is an indispensible requirement for the kind of access patrons have come to expect, and for the reasonable success of the searching strategies they normally use. In this vein, examines the intrinsic value of browsing. In addition, with the help of some rough data compiled during a test conducted at Cornell University in the spring of 1994, estimates the cost of maintaining the collocative and alphabetical integrity of shelflist files for works by or about individual literary authors
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 39(1995) no.3, S.294-302
  16. Egghe, L.: ¬The amount of actions needed for shelving and reshelving (1996) 0.01
    0.011300263 = product of:
      0.050851185 = sum of:
        0.03491035 = weight(_text_:library in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03491035 = score(doc=4394,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
        0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015940834 = score(doc=4394,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the number of actions (or time) needed to organize library shelves. Studies 2 types pf problem: organizing a library shelf out of an unordered pile of books, and putting an existing shelf of books in the rough order. Uses results from information theory as well as from rank order statistics (runs). Draws conclusions about the advised frequency with which these actions should be undertaken
    Source
    Library management. 17(1996) no.1, S.18-24
  17. Beck, S.G.: Wayfinding in libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.0111984145 = product of:
      0.050392866 = sum of:
        0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040310998 = score(doc=5503,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
        0.010081868 = weight(_text_:of in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010081868 = score(doc=5503,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies the architectural barriers in library buildings facing disabled users with particular reference to wayfinding and the provision of suitable signage, amps and ways of making spatial patterns within libraries more self evident. Concludes with notes on emergency egress and recommendations for making library buildings highly usable and easily navigable for library users in general and disabled people in particular
    Source
    Library hi tech. 14(1996) no.1, S.27-36
  18. Briel, G. von: Erfahrungen mit der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in der Kantonsbibliothek Thurgau in Frauenfeld/Schweiz (2008) 0.01
    0.010926281 = product of:
      0.049168266 = sum of:
        0.03491035 = weight(_text_:library in 2147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03491035 = score(doc=2147,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 2147, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2147)
        0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 2147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014257914 = score(doc=2147,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2147, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2147)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Thurgau Canton Library of the town of Frauenfeld/Switzerland contributes an insight into the way the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) was introduced there, as well as into the experience made with Dewey in everyday library practice for approx. five years. In the Canton Library the DDC is used not only for subject analysis but also for shelf arrangement of 13,000 media presently.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  19. Weaver, M.; Stanning, M.: Reclassification project at St Martin's College : a case study (2007) 0.01
    0.0108175725 = product of:
      0.048679076 = sum of:
        0.030856682 = weight(_text_:library in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030856682 = score(doc=852,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.35579824 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
        0.017822394 = weight(_text_:of in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017822394 = score(doc=852,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to outline the approach taken to the reclassification of the library collection within a small multi-site college of higher education - whereby 160,000 volumes were converted from the BLISS system to the Dewey Decimal Classification system, over a period of 11 weeks during Summer 2004. Design/methodology/approach - An automated approach was taken whereby the Library Systems Supplier - Talis was commissioned to convert catalogue records using a batch process. Risk analysis and critical path analysis were used as tools to keep the project on schedule and provide quality control. Findings - An automated approach allowed the project to be completed on time, within budget and with minimal disruption to services. Project planning was crucial to the success of the project. This included mapping BLISS to Dewey numbers, recruitment of a student team, management of work packages and ensuring continuity of the Library Service during the project. Practical implications - Institutional support for the project was secured because of its relevance to the College's corporate agenda and the promise of a wider impact that the project would have in terms of modernisation of the library service. Originality/value - Despite the apparent lack of current articles on re-classification, many libraries are still grappling with ongoing retrospective cataloguing projects. This case study demonstrates how one institution approached the problem and demonstrates that an automated approach can yield benefits. It will be of use to other libraries thinking of, or involved with, similar conversions. The partnership role of the Library Management System Supplier is also highlighted.
    Source
    Library review. 56(2007) no.1, S.61-72
  20. Lin, W.; Yueh, H.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Fu, L.-C.: Developing a service robot for a children's library : a design-based research approach (2014) 0.01
    0.010168317 = product of:
      0.045757424 = sum of:
        0.033801798 = weight(_text_:library in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033801798 = score(doc=1198,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.38975742 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
        0.011955625 = weight(_text_:of in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011955625 = score(doc=1198,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding book-locating behavior in libraries is important and leads to more effective services that support patrons throughout the book-locating process. This study adopted a design-based approach to incorporate robotic assistance in investigating the book-locating behaviors of child patrons, and developed a service robot for child patrons in library settings. We describe the iterative cycles and process to develop a robot to assist with locating resources in libraries. Stakeholders, including child patrons and librarians, were consulted about their needs, preferences, and performance in locating library resources with robotic assistance. Their needs were analyzed and incorporated into the design of the library robot to provide comprehensive support. The results of the study suggest that the library robot was effective as a mobile and humanoid service agent for providing motivation and knowledgeable guidance to help child patrons in the initially complicated sequence of locating resources.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.290-301

Years

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 9
  • nl 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 47
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…