Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Beziehungen verbale / systematische Erschließung"
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12 
    0.12069766 = product of:
  0.24139532 = sum of:
    0.06034883 = product of:
      0.18104649 = sum of:
        0.18104649 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18104649 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18104649 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18104649 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  2. Ranganathan, S.R.: Subject headings and facet analysis (1964) 0.10 
    0.09506998 = product of:
  0.19013996 = sum of:
    0.1340635 = weight(_text_:headings in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1340635 = score(doc=1834,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.606243 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
    0.056076463 = product of:
      0.11215293 = sum of:
        0.11215293 = weight(_text_:terminology in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11215293 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46627194 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    After establishing the terminology, shows how the choice of the name of the subject of a document and the rendering of the name in the heading of the specific subject entry can be got by facet analysis based on postulates and principles. After showing that subject headings constitute an artificial language, points out that using facet analysis for subject heading does not amount to using class number. Marks out the area for an objective statistical survey of sought heading for subject entry. Calls on Council for Library Resources Incorporated to provide for this project
  3. Thesaurofacet: a thesaurus and faceted classification for engineering and related subjects (1969) 0.05 
    0.0473986 = product of:
  0.1895944 = sum of:
    0.1895944 = weight(_text_:headings in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1895944 = score(doc=344,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.8573571 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Technology
    Subject headings / Engineering
    Subject
    Subject headings / Technology
    Subject headings / Engineering
  4. Himanka, J.; Kautto, V.: Translation of the Finnish abridged edition of UDC into general Finnish subject headings (1992) 0.04 
    0.035917345 = product of:
  0.14366938 = sum of:
    0.14366938 = weight(_text_:headings in 3943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14366938 = score(doc=3943,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 3943, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3943)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Examines a method of converting assigned UDC numbers into subject headings. The method consists of 2 phases: a dictionary is created that maps UDC numbers to subject headings; and this dictionary is then mechanically applied to convert the bibliographic databases. Tests 15 different UDC classes and records translation success and problems encountered. Closely examines problems encountered in each part and describes 3 main types of UDC classes: the synthetic; the shallow enumerative; and the deep enumerative. Findings show that the time spent in the first phase is tolerable. Considers the initial question of translatability of the whole UDC in the light of the results
  5. Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The general theory of classification as the basis for structuring of subject headings (1985(?)) 0.03 
    0.033515874 = product of:
  0.1340635 = sum of:
    0.1340635 = weight(_text_:headings in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1340635 = score(doc=1830,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.606243 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Defines the basic functions of surrogate files in information retrieval. Exemplifies the categories enunciated in the general theory of classification developed in India. Defines the principles for structuring the concepts. Formulates set of general postulates pertaining to the structure of compound subjects. On the basis of these, outlines a procedure for structuring of subject headings. Demonstrates the application of procedure through examples
  6. Unesco thesaurus : a structured list of descriptors for indexing and retrieving literature in the fields of education, science, social science, culture and communication (1977) 0.03 
    0.033515874 = product of:
  0.1340635 = sum of:
    0.1340635 = weight(_text_:headings in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1340635 = score(doc=6424,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.606243 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings
    Subject
    Subject headings
  7. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: Compound descriptors in context : a matching function for classifications and thesauri (2002) 0.02 
    0.020947421 = product of:
  0.083789684 = sum of:
    0.083789684 = weight(_text_:headings in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083789684 = score(doc=3179,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.3789019 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    There are many advantages for Digital Libraries in indexing with classifications or thesauri, but some current disincentive in the lack of flexible retrieval tools that deal with compound descriptors. This paper discusses a matching function for compound descriptors, or multi-concept subject headings, that does not rely an exact matching but incorporates term expansion via thesaurus semantic relationships to produce ranked results that take account of missing and partially matching terms. The matching function is based an a measure of semantic closeness between terms, which has the potential to help with recall problems. The work reported is part of the ongoing FACET project in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry and its collections database. The architecture of the prototype system and its Interface are outlined. The matching problem for compound descriptors is reviewed and the FACET implementation described. Results are discussed from scenarios using the faceted Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus. We argue that automatic traversal of thesaurus relationships can augment the user's browsing possibilities. The techniques can be applied both to unstructured multi-concept subject headings and potentially to more syntactically structured strings. The notion of a focus term is used by the matching function to model AAT modified descriptors (noun phrases). The relevance of the approach to precoordinated indexing and matching faceted strings is discussed.
  8. Gödert, W.: Multilingualität und Lokalisierung zur Wissenserkundung : oder vom Nutzen semantischer Netze für das Information Retrieval (2007) 0.02 
    0.017774476 = product of:
  0.0710979 = sum of:
    0.0710979 = weight(_text_:headings in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0710979 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Das CrissCross-Projekt verfolgt die Zielsetzung, ein erweitertes multilinguales und thesaurusbasiertes Registervokabular zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC Deutsch) zu erstellen, das als Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten verwendet werden kann und soll damit die Ausgangsbedingungen für die Gestaltung von OPAC-Retrievalumgebungen verbessern helfen. Im einzelnen soll jedes Sachschlagwort der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) eine DDC-Notation erhalten und es sollen die im Projekt MACS begonnen Arbeiten fortgesetzt werden, Links zwischen den Schlagwörtern der SWD, den Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und dem Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifé (Rameau) herzustellen. In diesem Beitrag wird der Vorschlag gemacht, die Zielsetzung des Projektes darin zu sehen, eine Kern-Ontologie mit universalen Relationen als Klassifikation zu benutzen und die beteiligten Normdateien als zugeordnete semantische Netze zu entwickeln, indem nicht-generische Relationen die Aufgabe der durch die Lokalisierung gestellten Anforderungen übernehmen. Generische Relationen im bekannten Thesaurussinn sind für derartige semantische Netze nicht mehr erforderlich, da sie sich aus den generischen Beziehungen der Kern-Ontologie vererben.
  9. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: FACET: thesaurus retrieval with semantic term expansion (2002) 0.01 
    0.01184965 = product of:
  0.0473986 = sum of:
    0.0473986 = weight(_text_:headings in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0473986 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.21433927 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    There are many advantages for Digital Libraries in indexing with classifications or thesauri, but some current disincentive in the lack of flexible retrieval tools that deal with compound descriptors. This demonstration of a research prototype illustrates a matching function for compound descriptors, or multi-concept subject headings, that does not rely on exact matching but incorporates term expansion via thesaurus semantic relationships to produce ranked results that take account of missing and partially matching terms. The matching function is based on a measure of semantic closeness between terms.The work is part of the EPSRC funded FACET project in collaboration with the UK National Museum of Science and Industry (NMSI) which includes the National Railway Museum. An export of NMSI's Collections Database is used as the dataset for the research. The J. Paul Getty Trust's Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) is the main thesaurus in the project. The AAT is a widely used thesaurus (over 120,000 terms). Descriptors are organised in 7 facets representing separate conceptual classes of terms.The FACET application is a multi tiered architecture accessing a SQL Server database, with an OLE DB connection. The thesauri are stored as relational tables in the Server's database. However, a key component of the system is a parallel representation of the underlying semantic network as an in-memory structure of thesaurus concepts (corresponding to preferred terms). The structure models the hierarchical and associative interrelationships of thesaurus concepts via weighted poly-hierarchical links. Its primary purpose is real-time semantic expansion of query terms, achieved by a spreading activation semantic closeness algorithm. Queries with associated results are stored persistently using XML format data. A Visual Basic interface combines a thesaurus browser and an initial term search facility that takes into account equivalence relationships. Terms are dragged to a direct manipulation Query Builder which maintains the facet structure.
  10. Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.01 
    0.010514337 = product of:
  0.042057347 = sum of:
    0.042057347 = product of:
      0.08411469 = sum of:
        0.08411469 = weight(_text_:terminology in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411469 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.34970397 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
  11. Bee, G.: CrissCross (2006) 0.01 
    0.010368444 = product of:
  0.041473776 = sum of:
    0.041473776 = weight(_text_:headings in 1275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041473776 = score(doc=1275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.18754686 = fieldWeight in 1275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1275)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    An diesem Punkt setzt das neue Projekt CrissCross an, das gemeinsam von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) und der Fachhochschule Köln betrieben und von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert wird. CrissCross schafft Verbindungslinien zwischen einigen besonders verbreiteten und bewährten Erschließungsinstrumenten: Der deutschsprachigen Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD), den besonders im angloamerikanischen Raum verbreiteten Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), der französischen Dokumentationssprache Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié (Rameau) und der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) als dem international am meisten verbreiteten Klassifikationssystem. CrissCross kann dabei auf zwei wichtigen Vorgängerprojekten aufbauen. Hier ist zum einen das ebenfalls von DNB und der Fachhochschule Köln gemeinsam betriebene Vorgängerprojekt »DDC Deutsch« zu nennen. Bereits während dessen Laufzeit war deutlich geworden, wie vorteilhaft sich eine Anreicherung des DDC-Registers mit dem Schlagwortbestand der SWD auf die Klassifikationspraxis auswirken könnte. Genau dieser Schritt wird nun vollzogen, wobei sich die Projektarbeit auf die Sachschlagwörter konzentriert - kein kleines Unterfangen, beläuft sich doch die Zahl der zurzeit in der SWD befindlichen Datensätze mit dem Indikator s auf über 154.000.
  12. Root thesaurus. Pt.1.2 (1985) 0.01 
    0.009266449 = product of:
  0.037065797 = sum of:
    0.037065797 = product of:
      0.07413159 = sum of:
        0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07413159 = score(doc=467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 5.2007 14:22:43
  13. Karg, H.: Mapping Dewey and subject authorities : CrissCross (2007) 0.01 
    0.009266449 = product of:
  0.037065797 = sum of:
    0.037065797 = product of:
      0.07413159 = sum of:
        0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07413159 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  14. Frâncu, V.: ¬A universal classification system going through changes (2001) 0.01 
    0.008761947 = product of:
  0.03504779 = sum of:
    0.03504779 = product of:
      0.07009558 = sum of:
        0.07009558 = weight(_text_:terminology in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07009558 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.29141995 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In the early 1990s, indexing with classification codes from the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in an academic library, going from traditional to automated routines in any and all its activities, suddenly proved insufficient. Under the circumstances of online searching, the possibilities offered by the new OPAC looked much more attractive to indexers and searchers alike. Therefore, a quick shift to indexing with UDC and keywords instead of UDC numbers alone was made. Currency, precision and, more importantly, user-friendliness were strong advantages offered by keyword indexing and searching. But the larger the dictionary of keywords, the more problematic the consequences an information scattering, given the lack of control an terms. The present paper describes the advantages of the UDC in indexing by presenting some of the devices it is provided with: subdivision by analogy, common and special auxiliaries, use of synthesis, and use of connecting symbols. The solution of indexing with both UDC notation and words from a thesaurus based an UDC was prompted by some other characteristics of the schedules: a semi-faceted classification system, hierarchical organisation, richness in terminology and consistency and control of notation. The methodology used in building the thesaurus is conceived according to the international standards (ISO 2788 and 5964) to which some principles have been added, giving the specific approach of harmonising a classification structure with that of a thesaurus. Compatibility and translatability issues are also considered and some problems arising from them are treated in detail. Most of the problems discussed are illustrated with examples.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 12
  • d 2

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications