Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.09
    0.09450364 = product of:
      0.14175546 = sum of:
        0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03624057 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
        0.10551489 = sum of:
          0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056945946 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048568945 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
    Source
    Working with conceptual structures: contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: G. Stumme
  2. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.04
    0.04035003 = product of:
      0.060525045 = sum of:
        0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03624057 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.024284473 = product of:
          0.048568945 = sum of:
            0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048568945 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  3. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.02
    0.020923503 = product of:
      0.06277051 = sum of:
        0.06277051 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06277051 = score(doc=6055,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
  4. Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.02
    0.018489584 = product of:
      0.027734376 = sum of:
        0.015531673 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015531673 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.012202702 = product of:
          0.024405405 = sum of:
            0.024405405 = weight(_text_:conference in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024405405 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.12568209 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
  5. De Maio, C.; Fenza, G.; Loia, V.; Senatore, S.: Hierarchical web resources retrieval by exploiting Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis (2012) 0.02
    0.017934434 = product of:
      0.0538033 = sum of:
        0.0538033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0538033 = score(doc=2737,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, knowledge structuring is assuming important roles in several real world applications such as decision support, cooperative problem solving, e-commerce, Semantic Web and, even in planning systems. Ontologies play an important role in supporting automated processes to access information and are at the core of new strategies for the development of knowledge-based systems. Yet, developing an ontology is a time-consuming task which often needs an accurate domain expertise to tackle structural and logical difficulties in the definition of concepts as well as conceivable relationships. This work presents an ontology-based retrieval approach, that supports data organization and visualization and provides a friendly navigation model. It exploits the fuzzy extension of the Formal Concept Analysis theory to elicit conceptualizations from datasets and generate a hierarchy-based representation of extracted knowledge. An intuitive graphical interface provides a multi-facets view of the built ontology. Through a transparent query-based retrieval, final users navigate across concepts, relations and population.
  6. Kumar, C.A.; Radvansky, M.; Annapurna, J.: Analysis of Vector Space Model, Latent Semantic Indexing and Formal Concept Analysis for information retrieval (2012) 0.02
    0.017083969 = product of:
      0.051251903 = sum of:
        0.051251903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051251903 = score(doc=2710,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), a variant of classical Vector Space Model (VSM), is an Information Retrieval (IR) model that attempts to capture the latent semantic relationship between the data items. Mathematical lattices, under the framework of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), represent conceptual hierarchies in data and retrieve the information. However both LSI and FCA uses the data represented in form of matrices. The objective of this paper is to systematically analyze VSM, LSI and FCA for the task of IR using the standard and real life datasets.
  7. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.02
    0.01627027 = product of:
      0.04881081 = sum of:
        0.04881081 = product of:
          0.09762162 = sum of:
            0.09762162 = weight(_text_:conference in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09762162 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.50272834 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a
  8. Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996) 0.02
    0.01627027 = product of:
      0.04881081 = sum of:
        0.04881081 = product of:
          0.09762162 = sum of:
            0.09762162 = weight(_text_:conference in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09762162 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.50272834 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  9. Neuss, C.; Kent, R.E.: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information (1995) 0.01
    0.013805932 = product of:
      0.041417796 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=2204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the continuously growing amount of Internet accessible information resources, locating relevant information in the WWW becomes increasingly difficult. Recent developments provide scalable mechanisms for maintaing indexes of network accessible information. In order to implement sophisticated retrieval engines, a means of automatic analysis and classification of document meta information has to be found. Proposes the use of methods from the mathematical theory of concept analysis to analyze and interactively explore the information space defined by wide area resource discovery services
  10. Negm, E.; AbdelRahman, S.; Bahgat, R.: PREFCA: a portal retrieval engine based on formal concept analysis (2017) 0.01
    0.013805932 = product of:
      0.041417796 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=3291,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3291, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3291)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The web is a network of linked sites whereby each site either forms a physical portal or a standalone page. In the former case, the portal presents an access point to its embedded web pages that coherently present a specific topic. In the latter case, there are millions of standalone web pages, that are scattered throughout the web, having the same topic and could be conceptually linked together to form virtual portals. Search engines have been developed to help users in reaching the adequate pages in an efficient and effective manner. All the known current search engine techniques rely on the web page as the basic atomic search unit. They ignore the conceptual links, that reveal the implicit web related meanings, among the retrieved pages. However, building a semantic model for the whole portal may contain more semantic information than a model of scattered individual pages. In addition, user queries can be poor and contain imprecise terms that do not reflect the real user intention. Consequently, retrieving the standalone individual pages that are directly related to the query may not satisfy the user's need. In this paper, we propose PREFCA, a Portal Retrieval Engine based on Formal Concept Analysis that relies on the portal as the main search unit. PREFCA consists of three phases: First, the information extraction phase that is concerned with extracting portal's semantic data. Second, the formal concept analysis phase that utilizes formal concept analysis to discover the conceptual links among portal and attributes. Finally, the information retrieval phase where we propose a portal ranking method to retrieve ranked pairs of portals and embedded pages. Additionally, we apply the network analysis rules to output some portal characteristics. We evaluated PREFCA using two data sets, namely the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation 2010 and ClueWeb09 (category B) test data, for physical and virtual portals respectively. PREFCA proves higher F-measure accuracy, better Mean Average Precision ranking and comparable network analysis and efficiency results than other search engine approaches, namely Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), and BM25 techniques. As well, it gains high Mean Average Precision in comparison with learning to rank techniques. Moreover, PREFCA also gains better reach time than Carrot as a well-known topic-based search engine.
  11. Reinartz, T.P.; Zickwolff, M.: ¬Two conceptual approaches to acquire human expert knowledge in a complex real world domain (1996) 0.01
    0.013558558 = product of:
      0.040675674 = sum of:
        0.040675674 = product of:
          0.08135135 = sum of:
            0.08135135 = weight(_text_:conference in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135135 = score(doc=5908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.41894025 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  12. Groh, B.; Strahringer, S.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA-systems based on thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.013558558 = product of:
      0.040675674 = sum of:
        0.040675674 = product of:
          0.08135135 = sum of:
            0.08135135 = weight(_text_:conference in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135135 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.41894025 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings. Ed.: M.L. Mugnier u. M. Chein
  13. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.01
    0.011564035 = product of:
      0.034692105 = sum of:
        0.034692105 = product of:
          0.06938421 = sum of:
            0.06938421 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06938421 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  14. Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994) 0.01
    0.010846846 = product of:
      0.032540537 = sum of:
        0.032540537 = product of:
          0.065081075 = sum of:
            0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065081075 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  15. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.01
    0.010846846 = product of:
      0.032540537 = sum of:
        0.032540537 = product of:
          0.065081075 = sum of:
            0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065081075 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  16. Priss, U.: Comparing classification systems using facets (2000) 0.01
    0.010846846 = product of:
      0.032540537 = sum of:
        0.032540537 = product of:
          0.065081075 = sum of:
            0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065081075 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  17. Priss, U.; Old, L.J.: Concept neighbourhoods in knowledge organisation systems (2010) 0.01
    0.010846846 = product of:
      0.032540537 = sum of:
        0.032540537 = product of:
          0.065081075 = sum of:
            0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065081075 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
  18. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.01
    0.009490991 = product of:
      0.028472973 = sum of:
        0.028472973 = product of:
          0.056945946 = sum of:
            0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056945946 = score(doc=5089,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
  19. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.009490991 = product of:
      0.028472973 = sum of:
        0.028472973 = product of:
          0.056945946 = sum of:
            0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056945946 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  20. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.0092512285 = product of:
      0.027753685 = sum of:
        0.027753685 = product of:
          0.05550737 = sum of:
            0.05550737 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05550737 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81