Search (86 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.06
    0.060294222 = product of:
      0.18088266 = sum of:
        0.18088266 = sum of:
          0.09762162 = weight(_text_:conference in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09762162 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.50272834 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.08326105 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08326105 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
    Source
    Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1984, Klagenfurt, 3.-8.9.1984, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen, Pre-Conference Seminar
  2. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.06
    0.05529464 = product of:
      0.08294196 = sum of:
        0.062126692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062126692 = score(doc=2264,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
        0.020815263 = product of:
          0.041630525 = sum of:
            0.041630525 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041630525 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines problems caused by initial articles in library catalogs. The problematic records observed are those whose titles begin with a word erroneously considered to be an article at the retrieval stage. Many retrieval algorithms edit queries by removing initial words corresponding to articles found in an exclusion list even whether the initial word is an article or not. Consequently, a certain number of documents remain more difficult to find. The study also examines user behavior during known-item retrieval using the title index in library catalogs, concentrating on the problems caused by the presence of an initial article or of a word homograph to an article. Measures of success and effectiveness are taken to determine if retrieval is affected in such cases.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Cochrane, P.A.: 34th UIUC clinic highlights visualizing subject access (1997) 0.05
    0.052139133 = product of:
      0.0782087 = sum of:
        0.0538033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0538033 = score(doc=377,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
        0.024405405 = product of:
          0.04881081 = sum of:
            0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04881081 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, held 2-4 Mar 1997 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The clinic was entitled 'Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources'. Summarizes the following individual sessions: Visual browsing for information retrieval; Hypostatizing data collections, especially bibliographic; Simultaneous searching of distributed information and subject repositories on the WWW; Information filtering from multiple sources; Thesauri in the full text world; The role of controlled vocabulary in visualizing document associations; Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval; Spatial abilities and visualizations; Using IODyne as an indexing tool; Knowledge structures for information visualizing; Visualizing digital libraries; what role for the OPAC?; How will we provide subject access in the Interspace of the 21st century?; Natural language processing based information retrieval; Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation; Using electronic services to become an interbetworked business; and Conference Wrap up
  4. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.05
    0.050357588 = product of:
      0.07553638 = sum of:
        0.051251903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051251903 = score(doc=5365,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
        0.024284473 = product of:
          0.048568945 = sum of:
            0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048568945 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
  5. Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998) 0.04
    0.04035003 = product of:
      0.060525045 = sum of:
        0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03624057 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.024284473 = product of:
          0.048568945 = sum of:
            0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048568945 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion of the importance of clear cataloguing policies and routines as the basis of quality control, in relation to the methods used in the College of Mexico Library. The fundamental principle is to prevent errors occuring rather than to correct them subsequently. Indices of quality and effiency in relation to errors which do and do not affect retrieval, established through monthly review of samples of the work of each cataloguer, are used to monitor activities and ensure high standards. This process, essentially collaborative, promotes an overall culture of quality
    Date
    30. 1.1999 19:22:45
  6. Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999) 0.04
    0.04035003 = product of:
      0.060525045 = sum of:
        0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03624057 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
        0.024284473 = product of:
          0.048568945 = sum of:
            0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048568945 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the results of research to determine the extent of spelling errors in the State University of New York at Albany's online catalogue, whether these errors seriously affect users' access to library materials and what effect spelling errors will have on the group database planned for the State University of New York (SUNY). Using standard database tests, the catalogues of the four SUNY University Centers (Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo and Stony Brook) were studied. In addition, two comparison catalogues were studied: the New York State Library's Excelsior and California University's Melvyl. Results show that misspellings are unavoidable due to the way that most catalogues were built. These errors, however, are rarely an impediment to retrieval. Concludes with suggested ways to find and correct misspellings without expensive large scale efforts
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Allen, L.: Towards a learning catalogue : developing the next generation of library catalogues (1993) 0.04
    0.03697917 = product of:
      0.055468753 = sum of:
        0.031063346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031063346 = score(doc=8192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
        0.024405405 = product of:
          0.04881081 = sum of:
            0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04881081 = score(doc=8192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contends that library catalogues need to be seen as merely part of the information seeker's world and proposes the concept of a learning catalogue for library clients which will capture ways in which clients use data thus providing ideas for the further development of the system. Proposes a client centred system which is separated to maintain the bibliographic database from the mode of presentation of that data to the client. The designer of retrieval systems, by accepting that each client brings a unique view of the world's knowledge base to the information seeking activity, needs to acknowledge that this view of the world must be handled uniquely. By overlaying the idea of a learning component, it is possible to see how future queries might be handled more efficiently and the system can grow with client's developing needs
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  8. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.03
    0.030738732 = product of:
      0.09221619 = sum of:
        0.09221619 = sum of:
          0.05752409 = weight(_text_:conference in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05752409 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2962355 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.034692105 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034692105 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  9. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03
    0.030147111 = product of:
      0.09044133 = sum of:
        0.09044133 = sum of:
          0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04881081 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.041630525 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041630525 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  10. Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997) 0.03
    0.02882145 = product of:
      0.043232173 = sum of:
        0.025886122 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025886122 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
        0.017346052 = product of:
          0.034692105 = sum of:
            0.034692105 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034692105 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  11. Hoffman, H.H.; Magner, J.L.: Future outlook : better retrieval through analytic catalogs (1985) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=6365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 6365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6365)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.03
    0.025122594 = product of:
      0.07536778 = sum of:
        0.07536778 = sum of:
          0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040675674 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.034692105 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034692105 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013) 0.02
    0.02440567 = product of:
      0.073217005 = sum of:
        0.073217005 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073217005 = score(doc=1103,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Users' preferences for folders versus tags was studied in 2 working environments where both options were available to them. In the Gmail study, we informed 75 participants about both folder-labeling and tag-labeling, observed their storage behavior after 1 month, and asked them to estimate the proportions of different retrieval options in their behavior. In the Windows 7 study, we informed 23 participants about tags and asked them to tag all their files for 2 weeks, followed by a period of 5 weeks of free choice between the 2 methods. Their storage and retrieval habits were tested prior to the learning session and, after 7 weeks, using special classification recording software and a retrieval-habits questionnaire. A controlled retrieval task and an in-depth interview were conducted. Results of both studies show a strong preference for folders over tags for both storage and retrieval. In the minority of cases where tags were used for storage, participants typically used a single tag per information item. Moreover, when multiple classification was used for storage, it was only marginally used for retrieval. The controlled retrieval task showed lower success rates and slower retrieval speeds for tag use. Possible reasons for participants' preferences are discussed.
  14. Smiraglia, R.P.: Works as signs, symbols,and canons : The epistemology of the work (2001) 0.02
    0.023153253 = product of:
      0.06945976 = sum of:
        0.06945976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06945976 = score(doc=1119,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Works are key entities in the universe of recorded knowledge. Works are those deliberate creations (known variously as opera, oeuvres, Werke, etc.) that constitute individual sets of created conceptions that stand as the formal records of knowledge. In the information retrieval domain, the work as opposed to the document, has only recently received focused attention. In this paper, the definition of the work as an entity for information retrieval is examined. A taxonomic definition (that is, a definition built around a taxonomy) is presented. An epistemological perspective aids in understanding the components of the taxonomic definition. Works, thus defined as entities for information retrieval, are seen to constitute sets of varying instantiations of abstract creations. These variant instantiations must be explicitly identified in future systems for documentary information retrieval. An expanded perception of works, such as that presented in this paper, helps us understand the variety of ways in which mechanisms for their control and retrieval might better be shaped in future.
  15. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.02
    0.020098075 = product of:
      0.060294222 = sum of:
        0.060294222 = sum of:
          0.032540537 = weight(_text_:conference in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032540537 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.1675761 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.027753685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027753685 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  16. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.02
    0.020098075 = product of:
      0.060294222 = sum of:
        0.060294222 = sum of:
          0.032540537 = weight(_text_:conference in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032540537 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.1675761 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.027753685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027753685 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  17. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.02
    0.018502457 = product of:
      0.05550737 = sum of:
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  18. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.02
    0.018502457 = product of:
      0.05550737 = sum of:
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  19. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Semantische Umfeldsuche im Information Retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.017083969 = product of:
      0.051251903 = sum of:
        0.051251903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051251903 = score(doc=606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  20. Götze, D.: Information und Kultur am Scheideweg (1998) 0.02
    0.01627027 = product of:
      0.04881081 = sum of:
        0.04881081 = product of:
          0.09762162 = sum of:
            0.09762162 = weight(_text_:conference in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09762162 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.50272834 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rede am 17.8.98 anläßlich der 64. IFLA General Conference in Amsterdam

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 62
  • d 18
  • a 2
  • sp 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • el 5
  • m 5
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…