Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990) 0.03
    0.03144998 = product of:
      0.12579992 = sum of:
        0.12579992 = weight(_text_:processing in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12579992 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.575-591
  2. Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977) 0.03
    0.03144998 = product of:
      0.12579992 = sum of:
        0.12579992 = weight(_text_:processing in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12579992 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.367-375
  3. Bates, M.J.: Information and knowledge : an evolutionary framework for information science (2005) 0.02
    0.02282222 = product of:
      0.04564444 = sum of:
        0.038917366 = weight(_text_:processing in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038917366 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22138305 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.006727073 = product of:
          0.020181218 = sum of:
            0.020181218 = weight(_text_:science in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020181218 = score(doc=158,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.17642868 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Many definitions of information have been suggested throughout the history of information science. In this essay, the objective has been to provide a definition that is usable for the physical, biological and social meanings of the term, covering the various senses important to our field. Information has been defined as the pattern of organization of matter and energy. Information is everywhere except where there is total entropy. Living beings process, organize and ascribe meaning to information. Some pattern of organization that has been given meaning by a living being has been defined as information 2, while the above definition is information 1, when it is desirable to make the distinction. Knowledge has been defined as information given meaning and integrated with other contents of understanding. Meaning itself is rooted ultimately in biological survival. In the human being, extensive processing space in the brain has made possible the generation of extremely rich cultural and interpersonal meaning, which imbues human interactions. (In the short term, not all meaning that humans ascribe to information is the result of evolutionary processes. Our extensive brain processing space also enables us to hold beliefs for the short term that, over the long term, may actually be harmful to survival.) Data 1 has been defined as that portion of the entire information environment (including internal inputs) that is taken in, or processed, by an organism. Data 2 is that information that is selected or generated and used by human beings for research or other social purposes. This definition of information is not reductive--that is, it does not imply that information is all and only the most microscopic physical manifestation of matter and energy. Information principally exists for organisms at many emergent levels. A human being, for example, can see this account as tiny marks on a piece of paper, as letters of the alphabet, as words of the English language, as a sequence of ideas, as a genre of publication, as a philosophical position and so on. Thus, patterns of organization are not all equal in the life experience of animals. Some types of patterns are more important, some less so. Some parts of patterns are repetitive and can be compressed in mental storage. As mental storage space is generally limited and its maintenance costly to an animal, adaptive advantage accrues to the species that develops efficient storage. As a result, many species process elements of their environment in ways efficient and effective for their particular purposes; that is, as patterns of organization that are experienced as emergent wholes. We see a chair as a chair, not only as a pattern of light and dark. We see a string of actions by a salesperson as bait and switch, not just as a sequence of actions. We understand a series of statements as parts of a whole philosophical argument, not just as a series of sentences. The understanding of information embraced here recognizes and builds on the idea that these emergent wholes are efficient for storage and effective for the life purposes of human beings as successful animals (to date) on our planet. Thus, people experience their lives in terms of these emergent objects and relations, for the most part. Likewise, information is stored in retrieval systems in such a way that it can be represented to human beings in their preferred emergent forms, rather than in the pixels or bits in which the information is actually encoded within the information system.
    Content
    Auch unter: http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
  4. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.02
    0.0164344 = product of:
      0.0657376 = sum of:
        0.0657376 = product of:
          0.09860639 = sum of:
            0.040362436 = weight(_text_:science in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040362436 = score(doc=2746,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
            0.05824396 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05824396 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Content
    Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1033-1045
  5. Bates, M.J.: Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law : the Getty Online Searching Project report; no.5 (1996) 0.02
    0.01572499 = product of:
      0.06289996 = sum of:
        0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06289996 = score(doc=6978,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.697-707
  6. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.01
    0.012419055 = product of:
      0.04967622 = sum of:
        0.04967622 = product of:
          0.07451433 = sum of:
            0.03295579 = weight(_text_:science in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295579 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
            0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04155854 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
    Content
    Bezug (Letter to the editor) zu: McKay, D., Chang, S.,, Smith, W., Buchanan, G.: The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2019).
    Date
    25. 6.2019 11:13:29
  7. Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979) 0.01
    0.01235463 = product of:
      0.04941852 = sum of:
        0.04941852 = product of:
          0.07412778 = sum of:
            0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0266323 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
            0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047495477 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 30(1979), S.205-214
  8. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.01
    0.009212566 = product of:
      0.036850262 = sum of:
        0.036850262 = product of:
          0.05527539 = sum of:
            0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019974224 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  9. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.01
    0.007677138 = product of:
      0.030708551 = sum of:
        0.030708551 = product of:
          0.046062827 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
            0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029417641 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1590-1607
  10. Bates, M.J.: ¬The invisible substrate of information science (1999) 0.01
    0.005548396 = product of:
      0.022193585 = sum of:
        0.022193585 = product of:
          0.06658075 = sum of:
            0.06658075 = weight(_text_:science in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06658075 = score(doc=4324,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.5820636 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1043-1050
  11. Bates, M.J.: Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s : a memoir of student days (2004) 0.00
    0.004962636 = product of:
      0.019850545 = sum of:
        0.019850545 = product of:
          0.059551634 = sum of:
            0.059551634 = weight(_text_:science in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059551634 = score(doc=7246,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The author's experiences as a master's and doctoral student at the University of California at Berkeley School of Library and Information Studies during a formative period in the history of information science, 1966-71, are described. The relationship between documentation and information science as experienced in that program is discussed, as well as the various influences, both social and intellectual, that shaped the author's understanding of information science at that time.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Pioneers in library and information science
  12. Bates, M.J.: ¬A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS (1999) 0.00
    0.0048050517 = product of:
      0.019220207 = sum of:
        0.019220207 = product of:
          0.05766062 = sum of:
            0.05766062 = weight(_text_:science in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05766062 = score(doc=4316,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.1: The Journal, its society, and the future of print
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.975-993
  13. Bates, M.J.: Factors affecting subject catalog search success (1977) 0.00
    0.004438717 = product of:
      0.017754868 = sum of:
        0.017754868 = product of:
          0.0532646 = sum of:
            0.0532646 = weight(_text_:science in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0532646 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.161-169
  14. Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981) 0.00
    0.004438717 = product of:
      0.017754868 = sum of:
        0.017754868 = product of:
          0.0532646 = sum of:
            0.0532646 = weight(_text_:science in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0532646 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.139-170
  15. Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996) 0.00
    0.0039223526 = product of:
      0.01568941 = sum of:
        0.01568941 = product of:
          0.047068227 = sum of:
            0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047068227 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    14. 4.1997 20:22:55
  16. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.00
    0.0038838773 = product of:
      0.015535509 = sum of:
        0.015535509 = product of:
          0.046606526 = sum of:
            0.046606526 = weight(_text_:science in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046606526 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367
  17. Bates, M.J.: Hjoerland's critique of Bates' work on defining information (2008) 0.00
    0.0033976845 = product of:
      0.013590738 = sum of:
        0.013590738 = product of:
          0.040772215 = sum of:
            0.040772215 = weight(_text_:science in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040772215 = score(doc=4773,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.3564397 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In a recent article, Birger Hjørland (2007) critiqued the author's efforts in defining and conceptualizing information as a core concept in information science (Bates, 2005, 2006). It is argued that Hjørland has seriously misrepresented and confused the actual line of argument in those articles. Specifics of that case are presented, and the reader is urged to return to the original Bates articles to understand her claims. In those articles, Bates attempted to develop a broad conception of information, as well as a number of subtypes of information, for use in the field of information science. The development of information was related to evolutionary processes, with emergence as a significant theme.
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B.: Information: Objective or subjective/situational? In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2007) no.10, S.1448-1456. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643. Vgl. auch: Bates, M.J.: Birger Hjørland's Manichean misconstruction of Marcia Bates' work. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.2038-2044.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.842-844
  18. Bates, M.J.: ¬An explanatory paradigm for online information retrieval (1986) 0.00
    0.0033290375 = product of:
      0.01331615 = sum of:
        0.01331615 = product of:
          0.03994845 = sum of:
            0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03994845 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Intelligent information systems for the information society. Proc. of the 6th Int, Research Forum in Information Science, Frascati, 16.-18.9.1985. Ed.: B.C. Brooks
  19. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2020) 0.00
    0.0033290375 = product of:
      0.01331615 = sum of:
        0.01331615 = product of:
          0.03994845 = sum of:
            0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03994845 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.616
  20. Bates, M.J.: Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development (2007) 0.00
    0.0024025259 = product of:
      0.009610103 = sum of:
        0.009610103 = product of:
          0.02883031 = sum of:
            0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 3400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883031 = score(doc=3400,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 3400, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction. Dramatic changes in society and in the information disciplines and professions constituted the basis for a re-conceptualization of the content of the Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Method. Marcia J. Bates and Mary Niles Maack, Editors of the forthcoming Third Edition, working with a fifty-person Editorial Advisory Board, developed the new, projected contents list for the encyclopedia, based upon principles developed in the re-conceptualization. Analysis. Drawing on Bates' "Invisible Substrate of Information Science" article, and other sources, the information disciplines are seen as consisting of the "disciplines of the cultural record" and the "information sciences." These disciplines are all concerned with the collection, organization and access to information, across the entire traditional spectrum of disciplines, such as the humanities and natural and social sciences. Results. The disciplines covered in the encyclopedia are library and information science, archival science, records management, information systems, informatics, knowledge management, museum studies, bibliography, document and genre studies, and social studies of information. A variety of cognate disciplines are briefly covered as well. Conclusions. The information disciplines are coming into their own in the 21st century. They are increasingly prominent in universities and in society generally, and, possibly with the help of the encyclopedia, may come increasingly to be seen as a set of related disciplines traversing a spectrum of their own.