-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.06
0.055099815 = product of:
0.11019963 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.05516216 = product of:
0.08274324 = sum of:
0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04155854 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
ISO 8824: Information processing systems - open systems interconnection : specifications for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (1987)
0.03
0.03144998 = product of:
0.12579992 = sum of:
0.12579992 = weight(_text_:processing in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12579992 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.03
0.030299 = product of:
0.121196 = sum of:
0.121196 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047068227 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.03
0.02758108 = product of:
0.11032432 = sum of:
0.11032432 = product of:
0.16548648 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.082369395 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082369395 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 4.2002 19:29:54
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.03
0.02758108 = product of:
0.11032432 = sum of:
0.11032432 = product of:
0.16548648 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.082369395 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082369395 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 21. 4.2002 9:29:38
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Wittmann, C.: Limitations of indexing modules in word-processing software (1991)
0.03
0.027518734 = product of:
0.11007494 = sum of:
0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 8076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11007494 = score(doc=8076,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 8076, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8076)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
ISO 8825: Information processing systems - open systems interconnection : specifications of basic encoding rules for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (1987)
0.03
0.027518734 = product of:
0.11007494 = sum of:
0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11007494 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980)
0.02
0.02470926 = product of:
0.09883704 = sum of:
0.09883704 = product of:
0.14825556 = sum of:
0.0532646 = weight(_text_:science in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0532646 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.094990954 = weight(_text_:29 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094990954 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
-
Canganelli, P.: Sonar bookends : index generation (1994)
0.02
0.023587486 = product of:
0.09434994 = sum of:
0.09434994 = weight(_text_:processing in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09434994 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.53671354 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the Sonar Bookends software package designed to produce detailed full text indexes for inclusion with documents produced by word processing, desktop publishing or file management systems
-
Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000)
0.02
0.021620601 = product of:
0.086482406 = sum of:
0.086482406 = product of:
0.12972361 = sum of:
0.046606526 = weight(_text_:science in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046606526 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Booth, D.: Indexing parish registers by computer (1993)
0.02
0.01965624 = product of:
0.07862496 = sum of:
0.07862496 = weight(_text_:processing in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07862496 = score(doc=6622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4472613 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes a new version of PRINDEX computer programme which takes parish register transcript files from word processing files and produces edited indices of person, places and trades. Describes the computerized indexing which has three stages: parsing transcripts into lists of names, places; polishing the lists to remove errors, duplicates; presenting the data as edited indices
-
Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988)
0.02
0.01572499 = product of:
0.06289996 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.133-140
-
Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.01572499 = product of:
0.06289996 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.02
0.015286159 = product of:
0.030572318 = sum of:
0.02779812 = weight(_text_:processing in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02779812 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.15813075 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.002774198 = product of:
0.008322594 = sum of:
0.008322594 = weight(_text_:science in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008322594 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.07275795 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.115-116 (C. Jacobs): "This collection of articles by indexing practitioners, software designers and vendors is divided into five sections: Dedicated Software, Embedded Software, Online and Web Indexing Software, Database and Image Software, and Voice-activated, Automatic, and Machine-aided Software. This diversity is its strength. Part 1 is introduced by two chapters an choosing dedicated software, highlighting the issues involved and providing tips an evaluating requirements. The second chapter includes a fourteen page chart that analyzes the attributes of Authex Plus, three versions of CINDEX 1.5, MACREX 7, two versions of SKY Index (5.1 and 6.0) and wINDEX. The lasting value in this chart is its utility in making the prospective user aware of the various attributes/capabilities that are possible and that should be considered. The following chapters consist of 16 testimonials for these software packages, completed by a final chapter an specialized/customized software. The point is made that if a particular software function could increase your efficiency, it can probably be created. The chapters in Part 2, Embedded Software, go into a great deal more detail about how the programs work, and are less reviews than illustrations of functionality. Perhaps this is because they are not really stand-alones, but are functions within, or add-ons used with larger word processing or publishing programs. The software considered are Microsoft Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, IndexTension 3.1.5 that is used with QuarkXPress, and Index Tools Professional and IXgen that are used with FrameMaker. The advantages and disadvantages of embedded indexing are made very clear, but the actual illustrations are difficult to follow if one has not worked at all with embedded software. Nonetheless, the section is valuable as it highlights issues and provides pointers an solutions to embedded indexing problems.
Part 3, Online and Web Indexing Software, opens with a chapter in which the functionalities of HTML/Prep, HTML Indexer, and RoboHELP HTML Edition are compared. The following three chapters look at them individually. This section helps clarify the basic types of non-database web indexing - that used for back-of-the-book style indexes, and that used for online help indexes. The first chapter of Part 4, Database and image software, begins with a good discussion of what database indexing is, but falls to carry through with any listing of general characteristics, problems and attributes that should be considered when choosing database indexing software. It does include the results of an informal survey an the Yahoogroups database indexing site, as well as three short Gase studies an database indexing projects. The survey provides interesting information about freelancing, but it is not very useful if you are trying to gather information about different software. For example, the most common type of software used by those surveyed turns out to be word-processing software. This seems an odd/awkward choice, and it would have been helpful to know how and why the non-specialized software is being used. The survey serves as a snapshot of a particular segment of database indexing practice, but is not helpful if you are thinking about purchasing, adapting, or commissioning software. The three case studies give an idea of the complexity of database indexing and there is a helpful bibliography.
A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
O'Kane, K.C.: Generating hierarchical document indices from common denominators in large document collections (1996)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.105-115
-
Bernhardt, R.: Erstellung von Registern (1971)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper deals with procedures and problems arising when computers are used as tools in the production of indexes. The following steps of the procedure are explained and studied: 1) Correction of machine-readable records; 2) Production of index entries. Here, various methods and forms (KWIC, KWOC, rotation method) and dictionary use are described and discussed, and information about their advantages and disadvantages is given; 3) Sorting and cumulation of index entries; 4) Output and setting, output feasibilities are detailed. Emphasis is also laid on the problems arising from the non-satisfactory links of the processing chain: data recording, limited fonts, and choice of index terms.
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.012283421 = product of:
0.049133684 = sum of:
0.049133684 = product of:
0.073700525 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047068227 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Roberts, C.: HyperIndex : new indexing software for the Mac (1996)
0.01
0.007915913 = product of:
0.031663653 = sum of:
0.031663653 = product of:
0.094990954 = sum of:
0.094990954 = weight(_text_:29 in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094990954 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Keywords. 4(1996) nos.3/4, S.29-31
-
Wright, J.C.: ¬The world of embedded indexing (2000)
0.01
0.007862495 = product of:
0.03144998 = sum of:
0.03144998 = weight(_text_:processing in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03144998 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17890452 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Here's the scenario: Your favorite client calls to tell you they are changing their processes. "We've decided to go completely electronic and embed the indexing in the files. Can you do that?" It looks like your life and the way you do your work is going to change if you say yes. But before you do, make sure you know enough about the new process to know whether you want to take on the project. Embedded indexing brings a whole new level of complexity to the indexing process. You will need to incorporate new software technologies and special editing/index-compiling skills with the traditional thought and analysis that has always gone into the indexing process. What do we mean when we say you can embed indexing into files? The simplest answer is the one that Nancy Mulvany gives in Indexing Books: Embedded indexing software is generally a feature found in word processing or page design software such as WordPerfect or Ventura Publisher. Embedded indexing software allows the indexer to insert index entries (or tags for entries) directly into the document's text files. In other words, instead of writing an index in CINDEX, Macrex, or SkyIndex, you put the index entries directly into the same files that are used to create the book. Many companies use Microsoft Word, PageMaker, FrameMaker, or Quark to create their manuals and books, editing, layout, and printing directly from the program files. Pasting up pages manually and creating galleys are not part of electronic publishing. Everything lives in files, from the time it is written until the time it goes to the publisher's printing plates. When you embed indexing codes into these files, the publisher has no worry about what page numbers go into the index until the very end. If needed, files can go through layout, content and copy-edit changes even after indexing is completed. This approach also permits indexing and text to be re-used in the next edition or even converted into hyperactive links!
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.007844705 = product of:
0.03137882 = sum of:
0.03137882 = product of:
0.094136454 = sum of:
0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094136454 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
