Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.07
    0.069973096 = product of:
      0.13994619 = sum of:
        0.06671549 = weight(_text_:processing in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06671549 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.07323071 = product of:
          0.10984607 = sum of:
            0.059922673 = weight(_text_:science in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059922673 = score(doc=3355,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.52385724 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
            0.049923394 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049923394 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    One of a series of three publications influenced by the travelling exhibit Places & Spaces: Mapping Science, curated by the Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center at Indiana University. - Additional materials can be found at http://http://scimaps.org/atlas2. Erweitert durch: Börner, Katy. Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know.
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Science / Atlases
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Data processing
    Subject
    Science / Atlases
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Communication in science / Data processing
  2. Huang, S.-C.; Bias, R.G.; Schnyer, D.: How are icons processed by the brain? : Neuroimaging measures of four types of visual stimuli used in information systems (2015) 0.03
    0.030572318 = product of:
      0.061144635 = sum of:
        0.05559624 = weight(_text_:processing in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05559624 = score(doc=1725,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We sought to understand how users interpret meanings of symbols commonly used in information systems, especially how icons are processed by the brain. We investigated Chinese and English speakers' processing of 4 types of visual stimuli: icons, pictures, Chinese characters, and English words. The goal was to examine, via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, the hypothesis that people cognitively process icons as logographic words and to provide neurological evidence related to human-computer interaction (HCI), which has been rare in traditional information system studies. According to the neuroimaging data of 19 participants, we conclude that icons are not cognitively processed as logographical words like Chinese characters, although they both stimulate the semantic system in the brain that is needed for language processing. Instead, more similar to images and pictures, icons are not as efficient as words in conveying meanings, and brains (people) make more effort to process icons than words. We use this study to demonstrate that it is practicable to test information system constructs such as elements of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) with neuroscience data and that, with such data, we can better understand individual or group differences related to system usage and user-computer interactions.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.4, S.702-720
  3. Zhang, J.: TOFIR: A tool of facilitating information retrieval : introduce a visual retrieval model (2001) 0.03
    0.027518734 = product of:
      0.11007494 = sum of:
        0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 7711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11007494 = score(doc=7711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 7711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7711)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.4, S.639-657
  4. Koshman, S.: Testing user interaction with a prototype visualization-based information retrieval system (2005) 0.02
    0.022430437 = product of:
      0.044860873 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 3562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=3562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 3562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3562)
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 3562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=3562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The VIBE (Visual Information Browsing Environment) prototype system, which was developed at Molde College in Norway in conjunction with researchers at the University of Pittsburgh, allows users to evaluate documents from a retrieved set that is graphically represented as geometric icons within one screen display. While the formal modeling behind VIBE and other information visualization retrieval systems is weIl known, user interaction with the system is not. This investigation tested the designer assumption that VIBE is a tool for a smart (expert) user and asked: What are the effects of the different levels of user expertise upon VIBE usability? Three user groups including novices, online searching experts, and VIBE system experts totaling 31 participants were tested over two sessions with VIBE. Participants selected appropriate features to complete tasks, but did not always solve the tasks correctly. Task timings improved over repeated use with VIBE and the nontypical visually oriented tasks were resolved more successfully than others. Statistically significant differences were not found among all parameters examined between novices and online experts. The VIBE system experts provided the predicted baseline for this study and the VIBE designer assumption was shown to be correct. The study's results point toward further exploration of cognitive preattentive processing, which may help to understand better the novice/expert paradigm when testing a visualized interface design for information retrieval.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.824-833
  5. Parsons, P.; Sedig, K.: Adjustable properties of visual representations : improving the quality of human-information interaction (2014) 0.02
    0.022430437 = product of:
      0.044860873 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 1214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=1214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1214)
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 1214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=1214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1214)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Complex cognitive activities, such as analytical reasoning, problem solving, and sense making, are often performed through the mediation of interactive computational tools. Examples include visual analytics, decision support, and educational tools. Through interaction with visual representations of information at the visual interface of these tools, a joint, coordinated cognitive system is formed. This partnership results in a number of relational properties-those depending on both humans and tools-that researchers and designers must be aware of if such tools are to effectively support the performance of complex cognitive activities. This article presents 10 properties of interactive visual representations that are essential and relational and whose values can be adjusted through interaction. By adjusting the values of these properties, better coordination between humans and tools can be effected, leading to higher quality performance of complex cognitive activities. This article examines how the values of these properties affect cognitive processing and visual reasoning and demonstrates the necessity of making their values adjustable-all of which is situated within a broader theoretical framework concerned with human-information interaction in complex cognitive activities. This framework can facilitate systematic research, design, and evaluation in numerous fields including information visualization, health informatics, visual analytics, and educational technology.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.455-482
  6. Quirin, A.; Cordón, O.; Santamaría, J.; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Moya-Anegón, F.: ¬A new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual science maps in cubic time (2008) 0.02
    0.018863637 = product of:
      0.037727274 = sum of:
        0.03144998 = weight(_text_:processing in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03144998 = score(doc=2112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.17890452 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
        0.006277293 = product of:
          0.018831879 = sum of:
            0.018831879 = weight(_text_:science in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018831879 = score(doc=2112,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last few years, there is an increasing interest to generate visual representations of very large scientific domains. A methodology based on the combined use of ISI-JCR category cocitation and social networks analysis through the use of the Pathfinder algorithm has demonstrated its ability to achieve high quality, schematic visualizations for these kinds of domains. Now, the next step would be to generate these scientograms in an on-line fashion. To do so, there is a need to significantly decrease the run time of the latter pruning technique when working with category cocitation matrices of a large dimension like the ones handled in these large domains (Pathfinder has a time complexity order of O(n4), with n being the number of categories in the cocitation matrix, i.e., the number of nodes in the network). Although a previous improvement called Binary Pathfinder has already been proposed to speed up the original algorithm, its significant time complexity reduction is not enough for that aim. In this paper, we make use of a different shortest path computation from classical approaches in computer science graph theory to propose a new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm which allows us to reduce its time complexity in one order of magnitude, O(n3), and thus to significantly decrease the run time of the implementation when applied to large scientific domains considering the parameter q = n - 1. Besides, the new algorithm has a much simpler structure than the Binary Pathfinder as well as it saves a significant amount of memory with respect to the original Pathfinder by reducing the space complexity to the need of just storing two matrices. An experimental comparison will be developed using large networks from real-world domains to show the good performance of the new proposal.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.4, S.1611-1623
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system (1986) 0.02
    0.018531945 = product of:
      0.07412778 = sum of:
        0.07412778 = product of:
          0.11119167 = sum of:
            0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03994845 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
            0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07124322 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:16:29
    Source
    Empirical foundation of information and software science. Ed.: J.C. Agarwal u. P. Zunde
  8. Kraker, P.; Kittel, C,; Enkhbayar, A.: Open Knowledge Maps : creating a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge based on natural language processing (2016) 0.02
    0.016678872 = product of:
      0.06671549 = sum of:
        0.06671549 = weight(_text_:processing in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06671549 = score(doc=3205,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of Open Knowledge Maps is to create a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge. The base for this visual interface consists of so-called knowledge maps, which enable the exploration of existing knowledge and the discovery of new knowledge. Our open source knowledge mapping software applies a mixture of summarization techniques and similarity measures on article metadata, which are iteratively chained together. After processing, the representation is saved in a database for use in a web visualization. In the future, we want to create a space for collective knowledge mapping that brings together individuals and communities involved in exploration and discovery. We want to enable people to guide each other in their discovery by collaboratively annotating and modifying the automatically created maps.
  9. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.02
    0.015354276 = product of:
      0.061417103 = sum of:
        0.061417103 = product of:
          0.092125654 = sum of:
            0.033290375 = weight(_text_:science in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033290375 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
            0.058835283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058835283 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science ; 9398
  10. Petrovich, E.: Science mapping and science maps (2021) 0.01
    0.01436767 = product of:
      0.05747068 = sum of:
        0.05747068 = product of:
          0.08620602 = sum of:
            0.06245828 = weight(_text_:science in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06245828 = score(doc=595,freq=44.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.5460241 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                    44.0 = termFreq=44.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
            0.023747738 = weight(_text_:29 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023747738 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Science maps are visual representations of the structure and dynamics of scholarly knowl­edge. They aim to show how fields, disciplines, journals, scientists, publications, and scientific terms relate to each other. Science mapping is the body of methods and techniques that have been developed for generating science maps. This entry is an introduction to science maps and science mapping. It focuses on the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues of science mapping, rather than on the mathematical formulation of science mapping techniques. After a brief history of science mapping, we describe the general procedure for building a science map, presenting the data sources and the methods to select, clean, and pre-process the data. Next, we examine in detail how the most common types of science maps, namely the citation-based and the term-based, are generated. Both are based on networks: the former on the network of publications connected by citations, the latter on the network of terms co-occurring in publications. We review the rationale behind these mapping approaches, as well as the techniques and methods to build the maps (from the extraction of the network to the visualization and enrichment of the map). We also present less-common types of science maps, including co-authorship networks, interlocking editorship networks, maps based on patents' data, and geographic maps of science. Moreover, we consider how time can be represented in science maps to investigate the dynamics of science. We also discuss some epistemological and sociological topics that can help in the interpretation, contextualization, and assessment of science maps. Then, we present some possible applications of science maps in science policy. In the conclusion, we point out why science mapping may be interesting for all the branches of meta-science, from knowl­edge organization to epistemology.
    Date
    27. 5.2022 18:19:29
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special issue on 'Science and knowledge organization' mit längeren Überblicken zu wichtigen Begriffen der Wissensorgansiation.
  11. Hajdu Barat, A.: Human perception and knowledge organization : visual imagery (2007) 0.01
    0.01389906 = product of:
      0.05559624 = sum of:
        0.05559624 = weight(_text_:processing in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05559624 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to explore the theory and practice of knowledge organization and its necessary connection to human perception, and shows a solution of the potential ones. Design/methodology/approach - The author attempts to survey the problem of concept-building and extension, as well as the determination of semantics in different aspects. The purpose is to find criteria for the choice of the solution that best incorporates users into the design cycles of knowledge organization systems. Findings - It is widely agreed that cognition provides the basis for concept-building; however, at the next stage of processing there is a debate. Fundamentally, what is the connection between perception and the superior cognitive processes? The perceptual method does not separate these two but rather considers them united, with perception permeating cognition. By contrast, the linguistic method considers perception as an information-receiving system. Separate from, and following, perception, the cognitive subsystems then perform information and data processing, leading to both knowledge organization and representation. We assume by that model that top-level concepts emerge from knowledge organization and representation. This paper points obvious connection of visual imagery and the internet; perceptual access of knowledge organization and information retrieval. There are some practical and characteristic solutions for the visualization of information without demand of completeness. Research limitations/implications - Librarians need to identify those semantic characteristics which stimulate a similar conceptual image both in the mind of the librarian and in the mind of the user. Originality/value - For a fresh perspective, an understanding of perception is required as well.
  12. Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007) 0.01
    0.011820463 = product of:
      0.047281854 = sum of:
        0.047281854 = product of:
          0.07092278 = sum of:
            0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03562161 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    20. 1.2008 17:28:29
  13. Zhang, J.; Nguyen, T.: WebStar: a visualization model for hyperlink structures (2005) 0.01
    0.011793743 = product of:
      0.04717497 = sum of:
        0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 1056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717497 = score(doc=1056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1056)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.4, S.1003-1018
  14. Clavier, V.: Knowledge organization, data and algorithns : the new era of visual representation (2019) 0.01
    0.011793743 = product of:
      0.04717497 = sum of:
        0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 5634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717497 = score(doc=5634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 5634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5634)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article shows how visual representations have progressively taken the lead over classical language-based models of knowledge organization (KO). The paper adopts a theoretical and historical perspective and focuses on the consequences of the changes in the volume of data generated by data production on the KO models. Until now, data visualization tools have been used mainly by researchers with expertise in textual data processing or in computational linguistics. But now, these tools are accessible to a greater number of users. Thus, there are new issues at stake for KO, other professions and institutions for gathering data that contribute to defining new standards and KO representations.
  15. Wen, B.; Horlings, E.; Zouwen, M. van der; Besselaar, P. van den: Mapping science through bibliometric triangulation : an experimental approach applied to water research (2017) 0.01
    0.011742815 = product of:
      0.04697126 = sum of:
        0.04697126 = product of:
          0.07045689 = sum of:
            0.040772215 = weight(_text_:science in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040772215 = score(doc=3437,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.3564397 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
            0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029684676 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of constructing science maps based on bibliographic data has intrigued researchers for decades, and various techniques have been developed to map the structure of research disciplines. Most science mapping studies use a single method. However, as research fields have various properties, a valid map of a field should actually be composed of a set of maps derived from a series of investigations using different methods. That leads to the question of what can be learned from a combination-triangulation-of these different science maps. In this paper we propose a method for triangulation, using the example of water science. We combine three different mapping approaches: journal-journal citation relations (JJCR), shared author keywords (SAK), and title word-cited reference co-occurrence (TWRC). Our results demonstrate that triangulation of JJCR, SAK, and TWRC produces a more comprehensive picture than each method applied individually. The outcomes from the three different approaches can be associated with each other and systematically interpreted to provide insights into the complex multidisciplinary structure of the field of water research.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:12
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.724-738
  16. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.01
    0.011649592 = product of:
      0.046598367 = sum of:
        0.046598367 = product of:
          0.06989755 = sum of:
            0.034596376 = weight(_text_:science in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034596376 = score(doc=3693,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, Computer Science (CS) classifications are inconsistent in taxonomy strategies. t is necessary to develop CS taxonomy research to combine its historical perspective, its current knowledge and its predicted future trends - including all breakthroughs in information and communication technology. In this paper we have analyzed the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) by means of visualization maps. The important achievement of current work is an effective visualization of classified documents from the ACM Digital Library. From the technical point of view, the innovation lies in the parallel use of analysis units: (sub)classes and keywords as well as a spherical 3D information surface. We have compared both the thematic and semantic maps of classified documents and results presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the proposed new method is used for content-related evaluation of the original scheme. Summing up: we improved an original ACM classification in the Computer Science domain by means of visualization.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  17. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003) 0.01
    0.0098503865 = product of:
      0.039401546 = sum of:
        0.039401546 = product of:
          0.05910232 = sum of:
            0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029684676 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
            0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029417641 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:29:25
  18. Leide, J.E.; Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Brooks, M.; Cole, C.: Visualization schemes for domain novices exploring a topic space : the navigation classification scheme (2003) 0.01
    0.00982812 = product of:
      0.03931248 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=1078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.6, S.923-940
  19. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.: ¬A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log (2013) 0.01
    0.00982812 = product of:
      0.03931248 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.5, S.1019-1048
  20. Ahn, J.-w.; Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval (2013) 0.01
    0.00982812 = product of:
      0.03931248 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.5, S.1139-1164

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 16
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 87
  • m 10
  • el 7
  • x 5
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects