Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.11
    0.110547476 = product of:
      0.33164242 = sum of:
        0.33164242 = sum of:
          0.16520636 = weight(_text_:theory in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16520636 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083594024 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.082842045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082842045 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
  2. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.05
    0.050707452 = product of:
      0.15212235 = sum of:
        0.15212235 = product of:
          0.22818351 = sum of:
            0.1335069 = weight(_text_:theory in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1335069 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
            0.09467662 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09467662 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.03
    0.031692155 = product of:
      0.095076464 = sum of:
        0.095076464 = product of:
          0.14261469 = sum of:
            0.08344181 = weight(_text_:theory in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08344181 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
            0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05917289 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  4. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.02
    0.02362366 = product of:
      0.07087098 = sum of:
        0.07087098 = product of:
          0.10630646 = sum of:
            0.070802726 = weight(_text_:theory in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070802726 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is a topic of increasing interest in many disciplines. However, the dynamics of this behavior remain elusive. The extant research has taken cognitive and behavioral perspectives to study information-seeking behavior, and observed its dynamics in multiple sessions. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the dynamics of information-seeking behavior are not well understood. With a focus on interactive information retrieval behavior, this study proposes an integrated framework based on activity theory. This framework is not only comprehensive and integrated, but also offers an explanation of the mechanisms governing the interaction between users' cognitive states and their manifested behavior when using an information retrieval system. A set of four propositions are advanced to describe the mechanisms. The implications are discussed.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  5. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.02
    0.02263315 = product of:
      0.06789945 = sum of:
        0.06789945 = product of:
          0.10184917 = sum of:
            0.07226273 = weight(_text_:theory in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07226273 = score(doc=1073,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  6. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.02
    0.015851054 = product of:
      0.047553163 = sum of:
        0.047553163 = product of:
          0.07132974 = sum of:
            0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035826012 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  7. Wilson, T.D.: Activity theory and information seeking (2008) 0.01
    0.0148341 = product of:
      0.0445023 = sum of:
        0.0445023 = product of:
          0.1335069 = sum of:
            0.1335069 = weight(_text_:theory in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1335069 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Cole, C.: ¬A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge (2011) 0.01
    0.010365643 = product of:
      0.031096928 = sum of:
        0.031096928 = product of:
          0.09329078 = sum of:
            0.09329078 = weight(_text_:theory in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09329078 = score(doc=4474,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a theory of information need for information retrieval (IR). Information need traditionally denotes the start state for someone seeking information, which includes information search using an IR system. There are two perspectives on information need. The dominant, computer science perspective is that the user needs to find an answer to a well-defined question which is easy for the user to formulate into a query to the system. Ironically, information science's best known model of information need (Taylor, 1968) deems it to be a "black box"-unknowable and nonspecifiable by the user in a query to the information system. Information science has instead devoted itself to studying eight adjacent or surrogate concepts (information seeking, search and use; problem, problematic situation and task; sense making and evolutionary adaptation/information foraging). Based on an analysis of these eight adjacent/surrogate concepts, we create six testable propositions for a theory of information need. The central assumption of the theory is that while computer science sees IR as an information- or answer-finding system, focused on the user finding an answer, an information science or user-oriented theory of information need envisages a knowledge formulation/acquisition system.
  9. Vakkari, P.: ¬A theory of the task-based information retrieval process : a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study (2001) 0.01
    0.009635031 = product of:
      0.028905092 = sum of:
        0.028905092 = product of:
          0.08671527 = sum of:
            0.08671527 = weight(_text_:theory in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08671527 = score(doc=4493,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is threefold: (1) to give a summary of empirical results reported earlier on relations between students' problem stages in the course of writing their research proposals for a master's thesis and the information sought, choice of search terms and tactics and relevance assessments of the information found for that task; (2) to show how the findings of the study refine Kuhlthau's model of the information search process in the field of information retrieval (IR); and (3) to construe a tentative theory of a task-based IR process based on the supported hypotheses. The results of the empirical studies show that there is a close connection between the students' problem stages (mental model) in the task performance and the information sought, the search tactics used and the assessment of the relevance and utility of the information found. The corroborated hypotheses expand the ideas in Kuhlthau's model in the domain of IR. A theory of task-based information searching based on the empirical findings of the study is presented.
  10. Xu, Y.; Liu, C.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval : part II: an empirical study from the activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.009635031 = product of:
      0.028905092 = sum of:
        0.028905092 = product of:
          0.08671527 = sum of:
            0.08671527 = weight(_text_:theory in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08671527 = score(doc=333,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is complicated. Activity theory is a powerful theoretical instrument to untangle the "complications." Based on activity theory, a comprehensive framework is proposed in Part I (Y. Xu, 2007) of this report to describe interactive information retrieval (IIR) behavior. A set of propositions is also proposed to describe the mechanisms governing users' cognitive activity and the interaction between users' cognitive states and manifested retrieval behavior. An empirical study is carried out to verify the propositions. The authors' experimental simulation of 81 participants in one search session indicates the propositions are largely supported. Their findings indicate IIR behavior is planned. Users adopt a divide-and-conquer strategy in information retrieval. The planning of information retrieval activity is also partially manifested in query revision tactics. Users learn from previously read documents. A user's interaction with a system ultimately changes the user's information need and the resulting relevance judgment, but the dynamics of topicality perception and novelty perception occur at different paces.
  11. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.009204673 = product of:
      0.027614016 = sum of:
        0.027614016 = product of:
          0.082842045 = sum of:
            0.082842045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082842045 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  12. Jacobson, F.F.; Jacobson, M.J.: Representative cognitive learning theories and BI : a case study of end user searching (1993) 0.01
    0.00741705 = product of:
      0.02225115 = sum of:
        0.02225115 = product of:
          0.06675345 = sum of:
            0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 7228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06675345 = score(doc=7228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 7228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7228)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    To be successful at online searching, students must be able to apply the concepts and skills learned in the classroom to a variety of complex products and search conditions. Examines an online searching instructional programme for high school seniors from the perspective of several cognitive learning theories, and proposes a synthesized approach to applying learning theory to bibliographic instruction
  13. Shah, G.A.; Desai, A.T.; Nagarkar, S.A.: Search strategies : their importance in IR process (1992) 0.01
    0.0066344473 = product of:
      0.019903341 = sum of:
        0.019903341 = product of:
          0.059710022 = sum of:
            0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059710022 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by. A. Chatterjee et al
  14. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.01
    0.006555808 = product of:
      0.019667422 = sum of:
        0.019667422 = product of:
          0.059002265 = sum of:
            0.059002265 = weight(_text_:theory in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059002265 = score(doc=4915,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  15. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.01
    0.0055627874 = product of:
      0.016688362 = sum of:
        0.016688362 = product of:
          0.050065085 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Multitasking is the human ability to handle the demands of multiple tasks. Multitasking behavior involves the ordering of multiple tasks and switching between tasks. People often multitask when using information retrieval (IR) technologies as they seek information on more than one information problem over single or multiple search episodes. However, limited studies have examined how people order their information problems, especially during their Web search engine interaction. The aim of our exploratory study was to investigate assigned information problem ordering by forty (40) study participants engaged in Web search. Findings suggest that assigned information problem ordering was influenced by the following factors, including personal interest, problem knowledge, perceived level of information available on the Web, ease of finding information, level of importance and seeking information on information problems in order from general to specific. Personal interest and problem knowledge were the major factors during assigned information problem ordering. Implications of the findings and further research are discussed. The relationship between information problem ordering and gratification theory is an important area for further exploration.
  16. Johnson, J.D.: On contexts of information seeking (2003) 0.01
    0.0055627874 = product of:
      0.016688362 = sum of:
        0.016688362 = product of:
          0.050065085 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    While surprisingly little has been written about context at a meaningful level, context is central to most theoretical approaches to information seeking. In this essay I explore in more detail three senses of context. First, I look at context as equivalent to the situation in which a process is immersed. Second, I discuss contingency approaches that detail active ingredients of the situation that have specific, predictable effects. Third, I examine major frameworks for meaning systems. Then, I discuss how a deeper appreciation of context can enhance our understanding of the process of information seeking by examining two vastly different contexts in which it occurs: organizational and cancer-related, an exemplar of everyday life information seeking. This essay concludes with a discussion of the value that can be added to information seeking research and theory as a result of a deeper appreciation of context, particularly in terms of our current multi-contextual environment and individuals taking an active role in contextualizing.
  17. Lee, H.-J.; Muresan, G.: Mediated Web information retrieval for a complex searching task (2009) 0.01
    0.0055627874 = product of:
      0.016688362 = sum of:
        0.016688362 = product of:
          0.050065085 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of this study is to understand whether providing a search intermediary familiar with a problem domain and its topical structure would support a user's Web searching tasks, especially complicated tasks with multifaceted topics, and whether the order of searching tasks or system usage influences their successful completion. This study investigates the effect of two factors, the interaction mode and the display layout, on the three main measures of the user's Web searching behaviors: effectiveness, efficiency, and usability. Two interaction modes are compared, mediation via a domain-specific document collection versus nonmediated search, and two display layouts, a combination of browsing-supporting hierarchic display and ranked list of results versus the simple linear list of search results. The results are analyzed in the Flow theory point of view; they were analyzed by order of the tasks and system usage order. The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of how the mediation system and/or the combined display support a Web information user.
  18. Makulowich, J.S.: 10 tips on managing your Internet searching (1995) 0.01
    0.005307558 = product of:
      0.015922673 = sum of:
        0.015922673 = product of:
          0.047768015 = sum of:
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14.12.1995 20:51:29
  19. Mann, L.; Ball, C.: ¬The relationship between search strategy and risky choice (1994) 0.01
    0.005307558 = product of:
      0.015922673 = sum of:
        0.015922673 = product of:
          0.047768015 = sum of:
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 19:58:10
  20. Mohan, K.C.: Boolean and nearest neighbour text searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system (1996) 0.01
    0.005307558 = product of:
      0.015922673 = sum of:
        0.015922673 = product of:
          0.047768015 = sum of:
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=7255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 33(1996) no.1, S.29-38

Years

Languages

  • e 55
  • d 1
  • More… Less…