-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.02
0.019268516 = product of:
0.057805546 = sum of:
0.057805546 = product of:
0.17341663 = sum of:
0.17341663 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17341663 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.02
0.015414812 = product of:
0.046244435 = sum of:
0.046244435 = product of:
0.1387333 = sum of:
0.1387333 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1387333 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.02
0.015414812 = product of:
0.046244435 = sum of:
0.046244435 = product of:
0.1387333 = sum of:
0.1387333 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1387333 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Strong, R.W.: Undergraduates' information differentiation behaviors in a research process : a grounded theory approach (2005)
0.01
0.008292514 = product of:
0.02487754 = sum of:
0.02487754 = product of:
0.07463262 = sum of:
0.07463262 = weight(_text_:theory in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07463262 = score(doc=5985,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.41093725 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This research explores, using a Grounded Theory approach, the question of how a particular group of undergraduate university students differentiates the values of retrieved information in a contemporary research process. Specifically it attempts to isolate and label those specific techniques, processes, formulae-both objective and subjective-that the students use to identify, prioritize, and successfully incorporate the most useful and valuable information into their research project. The research reviews the relevant literature covering the areas of: epistemology, knowledge acquisition, and cognitive learning theory; early relevance research; the movement from relevance models to information seeking in context; and the proximate recent research. A research methodology is articulated using a Grounded Theory approach, and the research process and research participants are fully explained and described. The findings of the research are set forth using three Thematic Sets- Traditional Relevance Measures; Structural Frames; and Metaphors: General and Ecological-using the actual discourse of the study participants, and a theoretical construct is advanced. Based on that construct, it can be theorized that identification and analysis of the metaphorical language that the particular students in this study used, both by way of general and ecological metaphors-their stories-about how they found, handled, and evaluated information, can be a very useful tool in understanding how the students identified, prioritized, and successfully incorporated the most useful and relevant information into their research projects. It also is argued that this type of metaphorical analysis could be useful in providing a bridging mechanism for a broader understanding of the relationships between traditional user relevance studies and the concepts of frame theory and sense-making. Finally, a corollary to Whitmire's original epistemological hypothesis is posited: Students who were more adept at using metaphors-either general or ecological-appeared more comfortable with handling contradictory information sources, and better able to articulate their valuing decisions. The research concludes with a discussion of the implications for both future research in the Library and Information Science field, and for the practice of both Library professionals and classroom instructors involved in assisting students involved in information valuing decision-making in a research process.
-
Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964)
0.01
0.0074384985 = product of:
0.022315495 = sum of:
0.022315495 = product of:
0.066946484 = sum of:
0.066946484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066946484 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2018 13:24:08
22. 6.2018 13:54:52
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.00
0.004589066 = product of:
0.013767197 = sum of:
0.013767197 = product of:
0.04130159 = sum of:
0.04130159 = weight(_text_:theory in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04130159 = score(doc=1077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.22741209 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
-
Mair, M.: Increasing the value of meta data by using associative semantic networks (2002)
0.00
0.0039806683 = product of:
0.011942005 = sum of:
0.011942005 = product of:
0.035826012 = sum of:
0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035826012 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 3.2006 19:24:29
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.00
0.00394486 = product of:
0.011834579 = sum of:
0.011834579 = product of:
0.035503734 = sum of:
0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035503734 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012)
0.00
0.0032873831 = product of:
0.009862149 = sum of:
0.009862149 = product of:
0.029586446 = sum of:
0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029586446 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 2.2013 18:00:22
-
Makewita, S.M.: Investigating the generic information-seeking function of organisational decision-makers : perspectives on improving organisational information systems (2002)
0.00
0.0032873831 = product of:
0.009862149 = sum of:
0.009862149 = product of:
0.029586446 = sum of:
0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029586446 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2022 12:16:58
-
Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017)
0.00
0.0026299064 = product of:
0.007889719 = sum of:
0.007889719 = product of:
0.023669155 = sum of:
0.023669155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023669155 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
