Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kantor, P.B."
  1. Kantor, P.B.: Information theory (2009) 0.02
    0.023359802 = product of:
      0.0700794 = sum of:
        0.042192098 = product of:
          0.084384196 = sum of:
            0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084384196 = score(doc=3815,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.027887305 = product of:
          0.05577461 = sum of:
            0.05577461 = weight(_text_:methods in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05577461 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information theory "measures quantity of information" and is that branch of applied mathematics that deals with the efficient transmission of messages in an encoded language. It is fundamental to modern methods of telecommunication, image compression, and security. Its relation to library information science is less direct. More relevant to the LIS conception of "quantity of information" are economic concepts related to the expected value of a decision, and the influence of imperfect information on that expected value.
  2. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.02043515 = product of:
      0.1226109 = sum of:
        0.1226109 = sum of:
          0.069718264 = weight(_text_:methods in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069718264 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.052892637 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052892637 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  3. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part I: Establishing a theoretical framework (1997) 0.01
    0.0144304065 = product of:
      0.04329122 = sum of:
        0.022375738 = product of:
          0.044751476 = sum of:
            0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044751476 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses underlying concepts related to value that must be clarified in order to proceed with any pragmatic study of value, and establishes a theory of use-oriented value of information and information services. Examines the notion of value in philosophy and economics and in relation to library and information services as well as the connection between value and relevance. Develops 2 models: one related to use of information and the other to use of library and information services. They are a theoretical framework for pragmatic study of value and a guide for the development of a Derived Taxonomy of Value in Using Library and Information Services
    Footnote
    1st part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
  4. Kantor, P.B.: Mathematical models in information science (2002) 0.01
    0.0061708074 = product of:
      0.037024844 = sum of:
        0.037024844 = product of:
          0.07404969 = sum of:
            0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07404969 = score(doc=4112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 28(2002) no.6, S.22-24
  5. Ng, K.B.; Kantor, P.B.; Strzalkowski, T.; Wacholder, N.; Tang, R.; Bai, B.; Rittman,; Song, P.; Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities (2006) 0.00
    0.004929826 = product of:
      0.029578956 = sum of:
        0.029578956 = product of:
          0.05915791 = sum of:
            0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05915791 = score(doc=182,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on a series of experiments to automate the assessment of document qualities such as depth and objectivity. The primary purpose is to develop a quality-sensitive functionality, orthogonal to relevance, to select documents for an interactive question-answering system. The study consisted of two stages. In the classifier construction stage, nine document qualities deemed important by information professionals were identified and classifiers were developed to predict their values. In the confirmative evaluation stage, the performance of the developed methods was checked using a different document collection. The quality prediction methods worked well in the second stage. The results strongly suggest that the best way to predict document qualities automatically is to construct classifiers on a person-by-person basis.
  6. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.004108188 = product of:
      0.024649128 = sum of:
        0.024649128 = product of:
          0.049298257 = sum of:
            0.049298257 = weight(_text_:methods in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049298257 = score(doc=6711,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.31409478 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In anticipation of the explosive growth of digital libraries, a complex study was undertaken seeking to evaluate 21 diverse services at 5 major academic research libraries. This work stands as a model for evaluation of digital libraries, through its focus on both the costs of operations and the impacts of the services that those operations provide. The data have been analyzed using both statistical methods and methods of Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the study, which are presented in detail, serve to demonstrate that a cross-functional approach to library services is feasible. They also highlight a new measure of impact, which is a weighted logarithmic combination of the amount of time that users spend interacting with the service, combined with a Likert-scale indication of the value of that service in relation to the time expended. The measure derived, incorporating simple information obtainable from the user, together with information which is readily available in server/client logs, provides an excellent foundation for transferring these measurement principles to the Digital Library environment
  7. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part II: Methodology and taxonomy (1997) 0.00
    0.0034859132 = product of:
      0.020915478 = sum of:
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    2nd part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
  8. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.00
    0.0030854037 = product of:
      0.018512422 = sum of:
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  9. Boros, E.; Kantor, P.B.; Neu, D.J.: Pheromonic representation of user quests by digital structures (1999) 0.00
    0.0029049278 = product of:
      0.017429566 = sum of:
        0.017429566 = product of:
          0.034859132 = sum of:
            0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 6684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034859132 = score(doc=6684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 6684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In a novel approach to information finding in networked environments, each user's specific purpose or "quest" can be represented in numerous ways. The most familiar is a list of keywords, or a natural language sentence or paragraph. More effective is an extended text that has been judged as to relevance. This forms the basis of relevance feedback, as it is used in information retrieval. In the "Ant World" project (Ant World, 1999; Kantor et al., 1999b; Kantor et al., 1999a), the items to be retrieved are not documents, but rather quests, represented by entire collections of judged documents. In order to save space and time we have developed methods for representing these complex entities in a short string of about 1,000 bytes, which we call a "Digital Information Pheromone" (DIP). The principles for determining the DIP for a given quest, and for matching DIPs to each other are presented. The effectiveness of this scheme is explored with some applications to the large judged collections of TREC documents
  10. Kantor, P.B.: Information retrieval techniques (1994) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 1056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=1056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.53-90
  11. Shapira, B.; Kantor, P.B.; Melamed, B.: ¬The effect of extrinsic motivation on user behavior in a collaborative information finding system (2001) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 18:33:31
  12. Kantor, P.B.; Nordlie, R.: Models of the behavior of people searching the Internet : a Petri net approach (1999) 0.00
    0.0022238651 = product of:
      0.01334319 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 6712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=6712,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6712, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10.10.2001 17:29:47