-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.10
0.09645145 = product of:
0.28935432 = sum of:
0.07233858 = product of:
0.21701573 = sum of:
0.21701573 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21701573 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21701573 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21701573 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.07
0.06889388 = product of:
0.20668164 = sum of:
0.05167041 = product of:
0.15501122 = sum of:
0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15501122 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15501122 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023)
0.02
0.017673736 = product of:
0.106042415 = sum of:
0.106042415 = sum of:
0.06901757 = weight(_text_:methods in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06901757 = score(doc=997,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.43973273 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:23:31
-
Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007)
0.01
0.014304606 = product of:
0.085827634 = sum of:
0.085827634 = sum of:
0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048802786 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- With the increasing requirement of establishing semantic mappings between different vocabularies, further development of these encoding formats is becoming more and more important. For this reason, four types of knowledge representation formats were assessed:MARC21 for Classification Data in XML, Zthes XML Schema, XTM(XML Topic Map), and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System). This paper explores the potential of adapting these representation formats to support different semantic mapping methods, and discusses the implication of extending them to represent more complex KOS.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:27
-
Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010)
0.01
0.012837312 = product of:
0.038511936 = sum of:
0.022644145 = product of:
0.04528829 = sum of:
0.04528829 = weight(_text_:29 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04528829 = score(doc=4408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01586779 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 29. 3.2011 10:47:10
29. 3.2011 10:57:42
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.012817426 = product of:
0.038452275 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.022440447 = product of:
0.044880893 = sum of:
0.044880893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044880893 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Khiat, A.; Benaissa, M.: Approach for instance-based ontology alignment : using argument and event structures of generative lexicon (2014)
0.01
0.012795856 = product of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Ontology alignment became a very important problem to ensure semantic interoperability for different sources of information heterogeneous and distributed. Instance-based ontology alignment represents a very promising technique to find semantic correspondences between entities of different ontologies when they contain a lot of instances. In this paper, we describe a new approach to manage ontologies that do not share common instances.This approach extracts the argument and event structures from a set of instances of the concept of the source ontology and compared them with other semantic features extracted from a set of instances of the concept of the target ontology using Generative Lexicon Theory. We show that it is theoretically powerful because it is based on linguistic semantics and useful in practice. We present the experimental results obtained by running our approach on Biblio test of Benchmark series of OAEI 2011. The results show the good performance of our approach.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Naudet, Y.; Latour, T.; Chen, D.: ¬A Systemic approach to Interoperability formalization (2009)
0.01
0.012795856 = product of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- With a first version developed last year, the Ontology of Interoperability (OoI) aims at formally describing concepts relating to problems and solutions in the domain of interoperability. From the beginning, the OoI has its foundations in the systemic theory and addresses interoperability from the general point of view of a system, whether it is composed by other systems (systems-of-systems) or not. In this paper, we present the last OoI focusing on the systemic approach. We then integrate a classification of interoperability knowledge provided by the Framework for Enterprise Interoperability. This way, we contextualize the OoI with a specific vocabulary to the enterprise domain, where solutions to interoperability problems are characterized according to interoperability approaches defined in the ISO 14258 and both solutions and problems can be localized into enterprises levels and characterized by interoperability levels, as defined in the European Interoperability Framework.
- Date
- 29. 1.2016 18:48:14
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van; Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schreiber, G.: Two variations on ontology alignment evaluation : methodological issues (2008)
0.01
0.012309102 = product of:
0.036927305 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=4645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 4645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=4645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 4645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Evaluation of ontology alignments is in practice done in two ways: (1) assessing individual correspondences and (2) comparing the alignment to a reference alignment. However, this type of evaluation does not guarantee that an application which uses the alignment will perform well. In this paper, we contribute to the current ontology alignment evaluation practices by proposing two alternative evaluation methods that take into account some characteristics of a usage scenario without doing a full-fledged end-to-end evaluation. We compare different evaluation approaches in three case studies, focussing on methodological issues. Each case study considers an alignment between a different pair of ontologies, ranging from rich and well-structured to small and poorly structured. This enables us to conclude on the use of different evaluation approaches in different settings.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008)
0.01
0.010217575 = product of:
0.06130545 = sum of:
0.06130545 = sum of:
0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034859132 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026446318 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization systems (KOS), like thesauri and other controlled vocabularies, are used to provide subject access to information systems across the web. Due to the heterogeneity of these systems, mapping between vocabularies becomes crucial for retrieving relevant information. However, mapping thesauri is a laborious task, and thus big efforts are being made to automate the mapping process. This paper examines two mapping approaches involving the agricultural thesaurus AGROVOC, one machine-created and one human created. We are addressing the basic question "What are the pros and cons of human and automatic mapping and how can they complement each other?" By pointing out the difficulties in specific cases or groups of cases and grouping the sample into simple and difficult types of mappings, we show the limitations of current automatic methods and come up with some basic recommendations on what approach to use when.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013)
0.01
0.00817406 = product of:
0.04904436 = sum of:
0.04904436 = sum of:
0.027887305 = weight(_text_:methods in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887305 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.17767884 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021157054 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 28.10.2013 17:22:17
-
Woldering, B.: ¬Die Europäische Digitale Bibliothek nimmt Gestalt an (2007)
0.01
0.00708436 = product of:
0.02125308 = sum of:
0.010674552 = product of:
0.021349104 = sum of:
0.021349104 = weight(_text_:29 in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021349104 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010578527 = product of:
0.021157054 = sum of:
0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021157054 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:10:56
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.29-31
-
Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015)
0.01
0.0061708074 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = product of:
0.07404969 = sum of:
0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404969 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:08:38
-
Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007)
0.01
0.0052892636 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008)
0.01
0.0052892636 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 19:30:41
-
Krötzsch, M.; Hitzler, P.; Ehrig, M.; Sure, Y.: Category theory in ontology research : concrete gain from an abstract approach (2004 (?))
0.01
0.005274012 = product of:
0.031644072 = sum of:
0.031644072 = product of:
0.063288145 = sum of:
0.063288145 = weight(_text_:theory in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063288145 = score(doc=4538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The focus of research on representing and reasoning with knowledge traditionally has been on single specifications and appropriate inference paradigms to draw conclusions from such data. Accordingly, this is also an essential aspect of ontology research which has received much attention in recent years. But ontologies introduce another new challenge based on the distributed nature of most of their applications, which requires to relate heterogeneous ontological specifications and to integrate information from multiple sources. These problems have of course been recognized, but many current approaches still lack the deep formal backgrounds on which todays reasoning paradigms are already founded. Here we propose category theory as a well-explored and very extensive mathematical foundation for modelling distributed knowledge. A particular prospect is to derive conclusions from the structure of those distributed knowledge bases, as it is for example needed when merging ontologies
-
Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008)
0.01
0.0050314823 = product of:
0.030188894 = sum of:
0.030188894 = product of:
0.060377788 = sum of:
0.060377788 = weight(_text_:methods in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060377788 = score(doc=1909,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.384686 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
-
Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der; Schopman, B.: Instance-based semantic interoperability in the cultural heritage (2012)
0.01
0.0050314823 = product of:
0.030188894 = sum of:
0.030188894 = product of:
0.060377788 = sum of:
0.060377788 = weight(_text_:methods in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060377788 = score(doc=125,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.384686 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper gives a comprehensive overview over the problem of Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, with a particular focus on solutions centered around extensional, i.e., instance-based, ontology matching methods. It presents three typical scenarios requiring interoperability, one with homogenous collections, one with heterogeneous collections, and one with multi-lingual collection. It discusses two different ways to evaluate potential alignments, one based on the application of re-indexing, one using a reference alignment. To these scenarios we apply extensional matching with different similarity measures which gives interesting insights. Finally, we firmly position our work in the Cultural Heritage context through an extensive discussion of the relevance for, and issues related to this specific field. The findings are as unspectacular as expected but nevertheless important: the provided methods can really improve interoperability in a number of important cases, but they are not universal solutions to all related problems. This paper will provide a solid foundation for any future work on Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, in particular for anybody intending to apply extensional methods.
-
Zeng, M.L.; Chan, L.M.: Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (2004)
0.00
0.004929826 = product of:
0.029578956 = sum of:
0.029578956 = product of:
0.05915791 = sum of:
0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05915791 = score(doc=2224,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This report analyzes the methodologies used in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (KOS) such as controlled vocabularies and classification schemes that present the organized interpretation of knowledge structures. The development and trends of KOS are discussed with reference to the online era and the Internet era. Selected current projects and activities addressing KOS interoperability issues are reviewed in terms of the languages and structures involved. The methodological analysis encompasses both conventional and new methods that have proven to be widely accepted, including derivation/modeling, translation/adaptation, satellite and leaf node linking, direct mapping, co-occurrence mapping, switching, linking through a temporary union list, and linking through a thesaurus server protocol. Methods used in link storage and management, as weIl as common issues regarding mapping and methodological options, are also presented. It is concluded that interoperability of KOS is an unavoidable issue and process in today's networked environment. There have been and will be many multilingual products and services, with many involving various structured systems. Results from recent efforts are encouraging.
-
Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schopman, B.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der: Matching multilingual subject vocabularies (2009)
0.00
0.004929826 = product of:
0.029578956 = sum of:
0.029578956 = product of:
0.05915791 = sum of:
0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05915791 = score(doc=3035,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Most libraries and other cultural heritage institutions use controlled knowledge organisation systems, such as thesauri, to describe their collections. Unfortunately, as most of these institutions use different such systems, united access to heterogeneous collections is difficult. Things are even worse in an international context when concepts have labels in different languages. In order to overcome the multilingual interoperability problem between European Libraries, extensive work has been done to manually map concepts from different knowledge organisation systems, which is a tedious and expensive process. Within the TELplus project, we developed and evaluated methods to automatically discover these mappings, using different ontology matching techniques. In experiments on major French, English and German subject heading lists Rameau, LCSH and SWD, we show that we can automatically produce mappings of surprisingly good quality, even when using relatively naive translation and matching methods.
