Search (2048 results, page 1 of 103)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.17
    0.16534531 = product of:
      0.4960359 = sum of:
        0.124008976 = product of:
          0.37202692 = sum of:
            0.37202692 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37202692 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.37202692 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37202692 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.14
    0.13879846 = product of:
      0.27759692 = sum of:
        0.062004488 = product of:
          0.18601346 = sum of:
            0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601346 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.029578956 = product of:
          0.05915791 = sum of:
            0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05915791 = score(doc=400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.14
    0.13778776 = product of:
      0.41336328 = sum of:
        0.10334082 = product of:
          0.31002244 = sum of:
            0.31002244 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31002244 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.31002244 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31002244 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.12
    0.11849709 = product of:
      0.35549125 = sum of:
        0.22694844 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22694844 = score(doc=3355,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.8779235 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.12854281 = sum of:
          0.083661914 = weight(_text_:methods in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083661914 = score(doc=3355,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.53303653 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.044880893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044880893 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Statistics / Graphic methods
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
    Subject
    Statistics / Graphic methods
    Science / Study and teaching / Graphic methods
  5. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.11
    0.108355746 = product of:
      0.32506722 = sum of:
        0.062004488 = product of:
          0.18601346 = sum of:
            0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601346 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26306275 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26306275 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  6. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.10
    0.09645145 = product of:
      0.28935432 = sum of:
        0.07233858 = product of:
          0.21701573 = sum of:
            0.21701573 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21701573 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21701573 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21701573 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  7. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.09
    0.08652668 = product of:
      0.25958002 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.07356654 = sum of:
          0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041830957 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03173558 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  8. Hughes, A.V.; Rafferty, P.: Inter-indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales (2011) 0.08
    0.07669772 = product of:
      0.23009317 = sum of:
        0.018646449 = product of:
          0.037292898 = sum of:
            0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037292898 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.21144672 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21144672 = score(doc=4488,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.8179569 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to report a project to investigate the degree of inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of controlled vocabulary topical subject index terms to identical graphical images by different indexers at the National Library of Wales (NLW). Design/methodology/approach - An experimental quantitative methodology was devised to investigate inter-indexer consistency. Additionally, the project investigated the relationship, if any, between indexing exhaustivity and consistency, and the relationship, if any, between indexing consistency/exhaustivity and broad category of graphic format. Findings - Inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of topical subject index terms to graphic materials at the NLW was found to be generally low and highly variable. Inter-indexer consistency fell within the range 10.8 per cent to 48.0 per cent. Indexing exhaustivity varied substantially from indexer to indexer, with a mean assignment of 3.8 terms by each indexer to each image, falling within the range 2.5 to 4.7 terms. The broad category of graphic format, whether photographic or non-photographic, was found to have little influence on either inter-indexer consistency or indexing exhaustivity. Indexing exhaustivity and inter-indexer consistency exhibited a tendency toward a direct, positive relationship. The findings are necessarily limited as this is a small-scale study within a single institution. Originality/value - Previous consistency studies have almost exclusively investigated the indexing of print materials, with very little research published for non-print media. With the literature also rich in discussion of the added complexities of subjectively representing the intellectual content of visual media, this study attempts to enrich existing knowledge on indexing consistency for graphic materials and to address a noticeable gap in information theory.
  9. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.07
    0.07471367 = product of:
      0.224141 = sum of:
        0.036918085 = product of:
          0.07383617 = sum of:
            0.07383617 = weight(_text_:theory in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07383617 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.18722291 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18722291 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  10. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.07
    0.07223717 = product of:
      0.2167115 = sum of:
        0.041336328 = product of:
          0.12400898 = sum of:
            0.12400898 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12400898 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17537518 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17537518 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.07
    0.06889388 = product of:
      0.20668164 = sum of:
        0.05167041 = product of:
          0.15501122 = sum of:
            0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501122 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.07
    0.06889388 = product of:
      0.20668164 = sum of:
        0.05167041 = product of:
          0.15501122 = sum of:
            0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501122 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  13. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.07
    0.06889388 = product of:
      0.20668164 = sum of:
        0.05167041 = product of:
          0.15501122 = sum of:
            0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501122 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  14. Hartel, J.: ¬An arts-informed study of information using the draw-and-write technique (2014) 0.07
    0.06531893 = product of:
      0.13063785 = sum of:
        0.018646449 = product of:
          0.037292898 = sum of:
            0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037292898 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.094561845 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094561845 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.36580145 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
        0.017429566 = product of:
          0.034859132 = sum of:
            0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034859132 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    There are untold conceptions of information in information science, and yet the nature of information remains obscure and contested. This article contributes something new to the conversation as the first arts-informed, visual, empirical study of information utilizing the draw-and-write technique. To approach the concept of information afresh, graduate students at a North American iSchool were asked to respond to the question "What is information?" by drawing on a 4- by 4-inch piece of paper, called an iSquare. One hundred thirty-seven iSquares were produced and then analyzed using compositional interpretation combined with a theoretical framework of graphic representations. The findings indicate how students visualize information, what was drawn, and associations between the iSquares and prior renderings of information based on words. In the iSquares, information appears most often as pictures of people, artifacts, landscapes, and patterns. There are also many link diagrams, grouping diagrams, symbols, and written text, each with distinct qualities. Methodological reflections address the relationship between visual and textual data, and the sample for the study is critiqued. A discussion presents new directions for theory and research on information, namely, the iSquares as a thinking tool, visual stories of information, and the contradictions of information. Ideas are also provided on the use of arts-informed, visual methods and the draw-and-write technique in the classroom.
  15. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.06
    0.060377758 = product of:
      0.18113327 = sum of:
        0.029834319 = product of:
          0.059668638 = sum of:
            0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059668638 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.15129896 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15129896 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    British novelist E.M. Forster once complained that long books "are usually overpraised" because "the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time." To test his theory we collected reader ratings for 737 books tagged as "classic literature" on Goodreads.com, a review aggregator with 80m members. The bias towards chunky tomes was substantial. Slim volumes of 100 to 200 pages scored only 3.87 out of 5, whereas those over 1,000 pages scored 4.19. Longer is better, say the readers.
    Source
    https://www.1843magazine.com/data-graphic/what-the-numbers-say/how-long-is-the-perfect-book
  16. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.05
    0.051955767 = product of:
      0.1558673 = sum of:
        0.094561845 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094561845 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.36580145 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
        0.06130545 = sum of:
          0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034859132 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026446318 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  17. Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010) 0.05
    0.050386734 = product of:
      0.1511602 = sum of:
        0.13373064 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13373064 = score(doc=4117,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.51732135 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
        0.017429566 = product of:
          0.034859132 = sum of:
            0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034859132 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    To enable and guide effective metadata creation it is essential to understand the structure and patterns of the activities of the community around the photographs, resources used, and scale and quality of the socially created metadata relative to the metadata and knowledge already encoded in existing knowledge organization systems. This article presents an analysis of Flickr member discussions around the photographs of the Library of Congress photostream in Flickr. The article also reports on an analysis of the intrinsic and relational quality of the photostream tags relative to two knowledge organization systems: the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (TGM) and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Thirty seven percent of the original tag set and 15.3% of the preprocessed set (after the removal of tags with fewer than three characters and URLs) were invalid or misspelled terms. Nouns, named entity terms, and complex terms constituted approximately 77% of the preprocessed set. More than a half of the photostream tags were not found in the TGM and LCSH, and more than a quarter of those terms were regular nouns and noun phrases. This suggests that these terms could be complimentary to more traditional methods of indexing using controlled vocabularies.
    Aid
    Thesaurus for Graphic Materials
  18. Laing, S.; Masoodian, M.: ¬A study of the role of visual information in supporting ideation in graphic design (2015) 0.05
    0.049337573 = product of:
      0.29602543 = sum of:
        0.29602543 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29602543 = score(doc=1855,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            1.1451397 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Existing computer technologies poorly support the ideation phase common to graphic design practice. Finding and indexing visual material to assist the process of ideation often fall on the designer, leading to user experiences that are less than ideal. To inform development of computer systems to assist graphic designers in the ideation phase of the design process, we conducted interviews with 15 professional graphic designers about their design process and visual information needs. Based on the study, we propose a set of requirements for an ideation-support system for graphic design.
  19. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.04
    0.043114003 = product of:
      0.129342 = sum of:
        0.11347422 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11347422 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.43896174 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.01586779 = product of:
          0.03173558 = sum of:
            0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03173558 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.04
    0.041336328 = product of:
      0.24801797 = sum of:
        0.24801797 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24801797 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

Languages

  • e 1715
  • d 313
  • a 1
  • el 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1813
  • el 166
  • m 148
  • s 54
  • x 26
  • r 11
  • b 5
  • i 3
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications