Search (1355 results, page 1 of 68)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Buchel, O.; Coleman, A.: How can classificatory structures be used to improve science education? (2003) 0.12
    0.120116845 = product of:
      0.24023369 = sum of:
        0.24023369 = sum of:
          0.18602975 = weight(_text_:spaces in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18602975 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.57341063 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.05420395 = weight(_text_:22 in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05420395 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There is increasing evidence that libraries, traditional and digital, must support learning, especially the acquisition and enhancement of scientific reasoning skills. This paper discusses how classificatory structures, such as a faceted thesaurus, can be enhanced for novice science learning. Physical geography is used as the domain discipline, and the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype project provides the test bed for instructional materials and user analyses. The use of concept maps and topic maps for developing digital learning spaces is briefly discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Ferrer-i-Cancho, R.; Gavaldà, R.: ¬The frequency spectrum of finite samples from the intermittent silence process (2009) 0.11
    0.10510224 = product of:
      0.21020448 = sum of:
        0.21020448 = sum of:
          0.16277602 = weight(_text_:spaces in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16277602 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.5017343 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
          0.047428455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047428455 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It has been argued that the actual distribution of word frequencies could be reproduced or explained by generating a random sequence of letters and spaces according to the so-called intermittent silence process. The same kind of process could reproduce or explain the counts of other kinds of units from a wide range of disciplines. Taking the linguistic metaphor, we focus on the frequency spectrum, i.e., the number of words with a certain frequency, and the vocabulary size, i.e., the number of different words of text generated by an intermittent silence process. We derive and explain how to calculate accurately and efficiently the expected frequency spectrum and the expected vocabulary size as a function of the text size.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:18:29
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.09975362 = sum of:
      0.07942714 = product of:
        0.23828141 = sum of:
          0.23828141 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23828141 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42397466 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02032648 = product of:
        0.04065296 = sum of:
          0.04065296 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04065296 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Newby, G.B.: Cognitive space and information space (2001) 0.10
    0.098657176 = product of:
      0.19731435 = sum of:
        0.19731435 = product of:
          0.3946287 = sum of:
            0.3946287 = weight(_text_:spaces in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3946287 = score(doc=6977,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                1.2163877 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article works towards realization of exosomatic memory for information systems. In exosomatic memory systems, the information spaces of systems will be consistent with the cognitive spaces of their human users. A method for measuring concept relations in human cognitive space is presented: the paired comparison survey with Principal Components Analysis. A study to measure the cognitive spaces of 16 research participants is presented. Items measured include relations among seven TREC topic statements as well as 17 concepts from the topic statements. A method for automatically generating information spaces from document collections is presented that uses term cooccurrence, eigensystems analysis, and Principal Components Analysis. The extent of similarity between the cognitive spaces and the information spaces, which were derived independently from each other, is measured. A strong similarity between the information spaces and the cognitive spaces are found, indicating that the methods described may have good utility for working towards information systems that operate as exosomatic memories
  5. Designing information spaces : the social navigation approach (2003) 0.08
    0.08138801 = product of:
      0.16277602 = sum of:
        0.16277602 = product of:
          0.32555205 = sum of:
            0.32555205 = weight(_text_:spaces in 4587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32555205 = score(doc=4587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                1.0034686 = fieldWeight in 4587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4587)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Smith, T.; Zeng, M.: Building semantic tools for concept-based learning spaces : knowledge bases of strongly-structured models for scientific concepts in advanced digital libraries (2004) 0.07
    0.06976115 = product of:
      0.1395223 = sum of:
        0.1395223 = product of:
          0.2790446 = sum of:
            0.2790446 = weight(_text_:spaces in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2790446 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.86011595 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Kulyukin, V.A.; Settle, A.: Ranked retrieval with semantic networks and vector spaces (2001) 0.07
    0.065771446 = product of:
      0.13154289 = sum of:
        0.13154289 = product of:
          0.26308578 = sum of:
            0.26308578 = weight(_text_:spaces in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26308578 = score(doc=6934,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.8109251 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The equivalence of semantic networks with spreading activation and vector spaces with dot product is investigated under ranked retrieval. Semantic networks are viewed as networks of concepts organized in terms of abstraction and packaging relations. It is shown that the two models can be effectively constructed from each other. A formal method is suggested to analyze the models in terms of their relative performance in the same universe of objects
  8. Rorissa, A.; Clough, P.; Deselaers, T.: Exploring the relationship between feature and perceptual visual spaces (2008) 0.06
    0.060414933 = product of:
      0.120829865 = sum of:
        0.120829865 = product of:
          0.24165973 = sum of:
            0.24165973 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24165973 = score(doc=1612,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.7448823 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The number and size of digital repositories containing visual information (images or videos) is increasing and thereby demanding appropriate ways to represent and search these information spaces. Their visualization often relies on reducing the dimensions of the information space to create a lower-dimensional feature space which, from the point-of-view of the end user, will be viewed and interpreted as a perceptual space. Critically for information visualization, the degree to which the feature and perceptual spaces correspond is still an open research question. In this paper we report the results of three studies which indicate that distance (or dissimilarity) matrices based on low-level visual features, in conjunction with various similarity measures commonly used in current CBIR systems, correlate with human similarity judgments.
  9. Pomerantz, J.; Marchionini, G.: ¬The digital library as place (2007) 0.06
    0.05813429 = product of:
      0.11626858 = sum of:
        0.11626858 = product of:
          0.23253717 = sum of:
            0.23253717 = weight(_text_:spaces in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23253717 = score(doc=836,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.71676326 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a high-level investigation of the physical-conceptual continuum occupied by both digital and physical libraries. Design/methodology/approach - A framework is provided for thinking about the notions of place and library. The issue of materials and the ideas they represent is considered. Places for people are considered, including issues of people's sense of place in physical and digital spaces. The issue of physical and digital spaces as places for work, collaboration, and community-building is considered. Findings - As more digital libraries are built, and as more physical libraries offer electronic access to parts of their collection, two trends are likely to result: the role of the library as a storage space for materials will become decreasingly important; and the role of the library as a space for users, for individual and collaborative work, and as a space for social activity, will become increasingly important. Research limitations/implications - Digital libraries are unable to fulfill some of the functions of the physical library as physical spaces, but are able to offer functions beyond what the physical library can offer as cognitive spaces. Practical implications - Areas of likely future development for digital libraries are suggested, as vehicles for enhancing cognitive space by augmenting representations of ideas in materials. Originality/value - This paper argues that in many ways digital libraries really are places in the conceptual sense, and will continue to broaden and enrich the roles that libraries play in people's lives and in the larger social milieu.
  10. Ding, W.; Lin, X.: Information Architecture : the design and integration of information spaces (2009) 0.06
    0.05813429 = product of:
      0.11626858 = sum of:
        0.11626858 = product of:
          0.23253717 = sum of:
            0.23253717 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23253717 = score(doc=1,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.71676326 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information Architecture is about organizing and simplifying information, designing and integrating information spaces/systems, and creating ways for people to find and interact with information content. Its goal is to help people understand and manage information and make right decisions accordingly. In the ever-changing social, organizational and technological contexts, Information Architects not only design individual information spaces (e.g., individual websites, software applications, and mobile devices), but also tackle strategic aggregation and integration of multiple information spaces across websites, channels, modalities, and platforms. Not only they create predetermined navigation pathways, but also provide tools and rules for people to organize information on their own and get connected with others. Information Architects work with multi-disciplinary teams to determine the user experience strategy based on user needs and business goals, and make sure the strategy gets carried out by following the user-centered design (UCD) process via close collaboration with others. Drawing on the author(s) extensive experience as HCI researchers, User Experience Design practitioner, and Information Architecture instructors, this book provides a balanced view of the IA discipline by applying the IA theories, design principles and guidelines to the IA and UX practices. It also covers advanced topics such as Enterprise IA, Global IA, and Mobile IA. In addition to new and experienced IA practitioners, this book is written for undergraduate and graduate level students in Information Architecture, Information Sciences, Human Computer Interaction, Information Systems and related disciplines.
  11. Faba-Pérez, C.; Zapico-Alonso, F.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegón, F. de: Comparative analysis of webometric measurements in thematic environments (2005) 0.06
    0.05755002 = product of:
      0.11510004 = sum of:
        0.11510004 = product of:
          0.23020008 = sum of:
            0.23020008 = weight(_text_:spaces in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23020008 = score(doc=3554,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.7095595 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts to evaluate Web spaces an the basis of the information that they provide, their form or functionality, or even the importance given to each of them by the Web itself. The indicators that have been developed for this purpose fall into two groups: those based an the study of a Web space's formal characteristics, and those related to its link structure. In this study we examine most of the webometric indicators that have been proposed in the literature together with others of our own design by applying them to a set of thematically related Web spaces and analyzing the relationships between the different indicators.
  12. Faba-Perez, C.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegon, F. de: Self-organizing maps of Web spaces based an formal characteristics (2005) 0.06
    0.05755002 = product of:
      0.11510004 = sum of:
        0.11510004 = product of:
          0.23020008 = sum of:
            0.23020008 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23020008 = score(doc=1006,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.7095595 = fieldWeight in 1006, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The unceasing growth of electronic information available on the Web has made it indispensable to develop tools to analyse and evaluate its quality. Given the subjectivity underlying most of the qualitative analytical indicators at the present time, we here propose the use of characteristics or indicators of a formal character. We apply Kohonen's neural networks and study their topological organization in order to analyse how Web spaces behave with respect to these networks' formal characteristics. The interpretation of the results brings out the underlying structures and relationships in a closed Web environment.
  13. Hubrich, J.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.; Jacobs, J.-H.: Improving subject access in global information spaces : reflections upon internationalization and localization of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) (2008) 0.06
    0.05755002 = product of:
      0.11510004 = sum of:
        0.11510004 = product of:
          0.23020008 = sum of:
            0.23020008 = weight(_text_:spaces in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23020008 = score(doc=2190,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.7095595 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the establishment of global information spaces that are characterized by heterogeneity new kinds of knowledge organization systems (KOS) are needed to facilitate efficient subject access to available information resources. KOS need not to be built bottom-up. Internationalization and localization of common KOS enable making use of all different kinds of existing data from subject indexing for retrieval purposes and help creating a user-friendly tool that supports cross-national query modification and hermeneutic processes of information seeking as well as precise topical queries.
  14. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05
    0.052951425 = product of:
      0.10590285 = sum of:
        0.10590285 = product of:
          0.31770855 = sum of:
            0.31770855 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31770855 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42397466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  15. Rölleke, T.; Tsikrika, T.; Kazai, G.: ¬A general matrix framework for modelling Information Retrieval (2006) 0.05
    0.05034578 = product of:
      0.10069156 = sum of:
        0.10069156 = product of:
          0.20138311 = sum of:
            0.20138311 = weight(_text_:spaces in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20138311 = score(doc=957,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.6207352 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a well-defined general matrix framework for modelling Information Retrieval (IR). In this framework, collections, documents and queries correspond to matrix spaces. Retrieval aspects, such as content, structure and semantics, are expressed by matrices defined in these spaces and by matrix operations applied on them. The dualities of these spaces are identified through the application of frequency-based operations on the proposed matrices and through the investigation of the meaning of their eigenvectors. This allows term weighting concepts used for content-based retrieval, such as term frequency and inverse document frequency, to translate directly to concepts for structure-based retrieval. In addition, concepts such as pagerank, authorities and hubs, determined by exploiting the structural relationships between linked documents, can be defined with respect to the semantic relationships between terms. Moreover, this mathematical framework can be used to express classical and alternative evaluation measures, involving, for instance, the structure of documents, and to further explain and relate IR models and theory. The high level of reusability and abstraction of the framework leads to a logical layer for IR that makes system design and construction significantly more efficient, and thus, better and increasingly personalised systems can be built at lower costs.
  16. Dillon, A.: Spatial-semantics : how users derive shape from information space (2000) 0.05
    0.049328588 = product of:
      0.098657176 = sum of:
        0.098657176 = product of:
          0.19731435 = sum of:
            0.19731435 = weight(_text_:spaces in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19731435 = score(doc=4602,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.6081939 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User problems with large information spaces multiply in complexity when we enter the digital domain. Virtual information environments can offer 3D representations, reconfigurations, and access to large databases that may overwhelm many users' abilities to filter and represent. As a result, user frequently experience disorienting in navigation large digital spaces to locate an duse information. To date, the research response has been predominantly based on the analysis of visual navigational aids that might support users' bottom-up processing of the spatial display. In the present paper, an emerging alternative is considered that places greater emphasis on the top-down application of semantic knowledge by the user gleaned from their experiences within the sociocognitive context of information production and consumption. A distinction between spatial and semantic cues is introduced, and existing empirical data are reviewed that highlight the differential reliance on spatial or semantic information as the domain expertise of the user increases. The conclusion is reached that interfaces for shaping information should be built on an increasing analysis of users' semantic processing
  17. Wolfram, D.; Zhang, J.: ¬The influence of indexing practices and weighting algorithms on document spaces (2008) 0.05
    0.049328588 = product of:
      0.098657176 = sum of:
        0.098657176 = product of:
          0.19731435 = sum of:
            0.19731435 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19731435 = score(doc=1963,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.6081939 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Index modeling and computer simulation techniques are used to examine the influence of indexing frequency distributions, indexing exhaustivity distributions, and three weighting methods on hypothetical document spaces in a vector-based information retrieval (IR) system. The way documents are indexed plays an important role in retrieval. The authors demonstrate the influence of different indexing characteristics on document space density (DSD) changes and document space discriminative capacity for IR. Document environments that contain a relatively higher percentage of infrequently occurring terms provide lower density outcomes than do environments where a higher percentage of frequently occurring terms exists. Different indexing exhaustivity levels, however, have little influence on the document space densities. A weighting algorithm that favors higher weights for infrequently occurring terms results in the lowest overall document space densities, which allows documents to be more readily differentiated from one another. This in turn can positively influence IR. The authors also discuss the influence on outcomes using two methods of normalization of term weights (i.e., means and ranges) for the different weighting methods.
  18. Visual interfaces to digital libraries : [extended papers presented at the first and second International Workshops on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) in 2001 and 2002] (2002) 0.05
    0.049253568 = product of:
      0.098507136 = sum of:
        0.098507136 = sum of:
          0.06976115 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06976115 = score(doc=1784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.21502899 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
          0.028745987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028745987 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17512208 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05000874 = queryNorm
              0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries exploit the power of human vision and spatial cognition to help individuals mentally organize and electronically access and manage large and complex information spaces. They draw on progress in the field of information visualization and seek to shift the users' mental load from slow reading to faster perceptual processes such as visual pattern recognition.Based on two workshops, the book presents an introductory overview as well as a closing listing of the top ten problems in the area by the volume editors. Also included are 16 thoroughly reviewed and revised full papers organized in topical sections on visual interfaces to documents, document parts, document variants, and document usage data; visual interfaces to image and video documents; visualization of knowledge domains; cartographic interfaces to digital libraries; and a general framework.
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 3.2008 15:02:37
  19. Rijsbergen, K. van: ¬The geometry of information retrieval (2004) 0.05
    0.046507437 = product of:
      0.09301487 = sum of:
        0.09301487 = product of:
          0.18602975 = sum of:
            0.18602975 = weight(_text_:spaces in 5459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18602975 = score(doc=5459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.57341063 = fieldWeight in 5459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Introduction; 2. On sets and kinds for IR; 3. Vector and Hilbert spaces; 4. Linear transformations, operators and matrices; 5. Conditional logic in IR; 6. The geometry of IR.
  20. Green, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics (2002) 0.05
    0.046507437 = product of:
      0.09301487 = sum of:
        0.09301487 = product of:
          0.18602975 = sum of:
            0.18602975 = weight(_text_:spaces in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18602975 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32442674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05000874 = queryNorm
                0.57341063 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.487401 = idf(docFreq=182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The basic conceptual units of cognitive semantics-image schemata, basic level concepts, and frames-are intemally structured, with meaningful relationships existing between components of those units. In metonymy, metaphor, and blended spaces, such intemal conceptual structure is complemented by extemal referential structure, based an mappings between elements of underlying conceptualspaces.

Languages

Types

  • a 1133
  • m 153
  • el 69
  • s 54
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications