-
Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000)
0.08
0.07516497 = product of:
0.112747446 = sum of:
0.06973162 = weight(_text_:search in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06973162 = score(doc=222,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
-
Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000)
0.06
0.05551693 = product of:
0.08327539 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.05
0.053949714 = product of:
0.08092457 = sum of:
0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053679425 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.027245143 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054490287 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Craven, T.C.: ¬An online index entry format based on multiple search terms (1987)
0.03
0.031630907 = product of:
0.09489272 = sum of:
0.09489272 = weight(_text_:search in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09489272 = score(doc=438,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.54307455 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A new approach to generate string index entries from concept networks is discussed: terms from multi-term search specifications are cited near the beginning of the entry, while an articulated entry structure indicative of concept relations is retained.
-
Stelmach, M.: ¬The application of index entries to search and retrieval of books and book content (1999)
0.03
0.031313002 = product of:
0.093939 = sum of:
0.093939 = weight(_text_:search in 6311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093939 = score(doc=6311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 6311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6311)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.02
0.01816343 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = product of:
0.10898057 = sum of:
0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10898057 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.02
0.01816343 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = product of:
0.10898057 = sum of:
0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10898057 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.02
0.01816343 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = product of:
0.10898057 = sum of:
0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10898057 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.02
0.01816343 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = product of:
0.10898057 = sum of:
0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10898057 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Earle, R.E.; Berry, R.; Nichols, M.C.: Indexing online information (1996)
0.02
0.017893143 = product of:
0.053679425 = sum of:
0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053679425 = score(doc=5126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- To take full advantage of search facilities, online indexes can be designed with a flat structure in which each index entry is clearly worded and makes use of keywords from the subject matter. Indexers can include additional keywords as synonyms that point to the relevant index entries. When indexers take advantage of these concepts and when index users clearly understand what to expect from online indexes, then the indexs become an extremely powerful retrieval medium
-
Lathrop, L.: Indexing after the millenium 2 : existing skills influence future development (1998)
0.02
0.017893143 = product of:
0.053679425 = sum of:
0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053679425 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Predicts that the 21st century will offer plenty of opportunities for indexers, whether they work with electronic media of traditional back-of-the-book indexes. Emphasizes the importance of indexes in online documents due in part to their inferior readability compared to that of printed books. Full-text search technology is not a viable substitute for a good index. At the same time the market for printed books will continue to grow. Existing indexing skills will be needed to develop new processes
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.015893001 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = product of:
0.095358 = sum of:
0.095358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095358 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
