Search (48 results, page 2 of 3)

0.013622571 = product of:
  0.040867712 = sum of:
    0.040867712 = product of:
      0.081735425 = sum of:
        0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081735425 = score(doc=3813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

18. 6.1999 9:22:36

0.013622571 = product of:
  0.040867712 = sum of:
    0.040867712 = product of:
      0.081735425 = sum of:
        0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081735425 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:59

0.013558928 = product of:
  0.040676784 = sum of:
    0.040676784 = weight(_text_:search in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040676784 = score(doc=127,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.23279473 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This thesis is organised as follows: Chapter 2 gives a general introduction to the field of information retrieval, covering its most important aspects. Further, the tasks of distributed and peer-to-peer information retrieval (P2PIR) are introduced, motivating their application and characterising the special challenges that they involve, including a review of existing architectures and search protocols in P2PIR. Finally, chapter 2 presents approaches to evaluating the e ectiveness of both traditional and peer-to-peer IR systems. Chapter 3 contains a detailed account of state-of-the-art information retrieval models and algorithms. This encompasses models for matching queries against document representations, term weighting algorithms, approaches to feedback and associative retrieval as well as distributed retrieval. It thus defines important terminology for the following chapters. The notion of "multi-level association graphs" (MLAGs) is introduced in chapter 4. An MLAG is a simple, graph-based framework that allows to model most of the theoretical and practical approaches to IR presented in chapter 3. Moreover, it provides an easy-to-grasp way of defining and including new entities into IR modeling, such as paragraphs or peers, dividing them conceptually while at the same time connecting them to each other in a meaningful way. This allows for a unified view on many IR tasks, including that of distributed and peer-to-peer search. Starting from related work and a formal defiition of the framework, the possibilities of modeling that it provides are discussed in detail, followed by an experimental section that shows how new insights gained from modeling inside the framework can lead to novel combinations of principles and eventually to improved retrieval effectiveness.
Chapter 5 empirically tackles the first of the two research questions formulated above, namely the question of global collection statistics. More precisely, it studies possibilities of radically simplified results merging. The simplification comes from the attempt - without having knowledge of the complete collection - to equip all peers with the same global statistics, making document scores comparable across peers. Chapter 5 empirically tackles the first of the two research questions formulated above, namely the question of global collection statistics. More precisely, it studies possibilities of radically simplified results merging. The simplification comes from the attempt - without having knowledge of the complete collection - to equip all peers with the same global statistics, making document scores comparable across peers. What is examined, is the question of how we can obtain such global statistics and to what extent their use will lead to a drop in retrieval effectiveness. In chapter 6, the second research question is tackled, namely that of making forwarding decisions for queries, based on profiles of other peers. After a review of related work in that area, the chapter first defines the approaches that will be compared against each other. Then, a novel evaluation framework is introduced, including a new measure for comparing results of a distributed search engine against those of a centralised one. Finally, the actual evaluation is performed using the new framework.

0.013419857 = product of:
  0.04025957 = sum of:
    0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04025957 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.230407 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this thesis, we present an ontology-based information extraction and retrieval system and its application to soccer domain. In general, we deal with three issues in semantic search, namely, usability, scalability and retrieval performance. We propose a keyword-based semantic retrieval approach. The performance of the system is improved considerably using domain-specific information extraction, inference and rules. Scalability is achieved by adapting a semantic indexing approach. The system is implemented using the state-of-the-art technologies in SemanticWeb and its performance is evaluated against traditional systems as well as the query expansion methods. Furthermore, a detailed evaluation is provided to observe the performance gain due to domain-specific information extraction and inference. Finally, we show how we use semantic indexing to solve simple structural ambiguities.

0.013419857 = product of:
  0.04025957 = sum of:
    0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04025957 = score(doc=4472,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.230407 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
However, this assumption does not hold in all cases, the needs of the user evolve over time and can move away from his previous interests stored in his profile. In other cases, the user's profile may be misused to extract or infer new information needs. This problem is much more accentuated with ambiguous queries. When multiple POIs linked to a search query are identified in the user's profile, the system is unable to select the relevant data from that profile to respond to that request. This has a direct impact on the quality of the results provided to this user. In order to overcome some of these limitations, in this research thesis, we have been interested in the development of techniques aimed mainly at improving the relevance of the results of current SRIs and facilitating the exploration of major collections of documents. To do this, we propose a solution based on a new concept and model of indexing and information retrieval called multi-spaces projection. This proposal is based on the exploitation of different categories of semantic and social information that enrich the universe of document representation and search queries in several dimensions of interpretations. The originality of this representation is to be able to distinguish between the different interpretations used for the description and the search for documents. This gives a better visibility on the results returned and helps to provide a greater flexibility of search and exploration, giving the user the ability to navigate one or more views of data that interest him the most. In addition, the proposed multidimensional representation universes for document description and search query interpretation help to improve the relevance of the user's results by providing a diversity of research / exploration that helps meet his diverse needs and those of other different users. This study exploits different aspects that are related to the personalized search and aims to solve the problems caused by the evolution of the information needs of the user. Thus, when the profile of this user is used by our system, a technique is proposed and used to identify the interests most representative of his current needs in his profile. This technique is based on the combination of three influential factors, including the contextual, frequency and temporal factor of the data. The ability of users to interact, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks on the Web, has led systems to focus on the types of interactions these users have at the level of interaction between them as well as their social roles in the system. This social information is discussed and integrated into this research work. The impact and how they are integrated into the IR process are studied to improve the relevance of the results.

0.012843484 = product of:
  0.03853045 = sum of:
    0.03853045 = product of:
      0.0770609 = sum of:
        0.0770609 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0770609 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 6.2018 13:24:08
22. 6.2018 13:54:52

0.012652363 = product of:
  0.037957087 = sum of:
    0.037957087 = weight(_text_:search in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037957087 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.21722981 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Mit der Entstehung des World Wide Web im Jahre 1989 und dem darauf folgenden rasanten Anstieg der Zahl an Webseiten, kam es sehr schnell zu der Notwendigkeit, eine gewisse Ordnung in die Vielzahl von Inhalten zu bringen. So wurde schon im Jahre 1991 ein erster Vorläufer der heutigen Websuchmaschinen namens Gopher entwickelt. Die Struktur von Gopher, bei der zunächst alle Webseiten katalogisiert wurden, um anschließend komplett durchsucht werden zu können, war damals richtungweisend und wird auch heute noch in den meisten anderen Websuchmaschinen verwendet. Von damals bis heute hat sich sehr viel am Markt der Suchmaschinen verändert. Seit dem Jahre 2004 gibt es nur mehr drei große Websuchmaschinen, bezogen auf die Anzahl erfasster Dokumente. Neben Yahoo! Search und Microsofts MSN Search ist Google die bisher erfolgreichste Suchmaschine der Welt. Dargestellt werden die Suchergebnisse, indem sie der Relevanz nach sortiert werden. Jede Suchmaschine hat ihre eigenen geheimen Kriterien, welche für die Bewertung der Relevanz herangezogen werden. Googles Suchergebnisse werden aus einer Kombination zweier Verfahren angeordnet. Neben der Hypertext-Matching-Analyse ist dies die PageRank-Technologie. Der so genannte PageRank-Algorithmus, benannt nach seinem Erfinder Lawrence Page, ist die wesentliche Komponente, die Google auf seinen Erfolgsweg gebracht hat. Über die genaue Funktionsweise dieses Algorithmus hat Google, insbesondere nach einigen Verbesserungen in den letzten Jahren, nicht alle Details preisgegeben. Fest steht jedoch, dass der PageRank-Algorithmus die Relevanz einer Webseite auf Basis der Hyperlinkstruktur des Webs berechnet, wobei die Relevanz einer Webseite danach gewichtet wird, wie viele Links auf sie zeigen und Verweise von ihrerseits stark verlinkten Seiten stärker ins Gewicht fallen.

0.011352143 = product of:
  0.03405643 = sum of:
    0.03405643 = product of:
      0.06811286 = sum of:
        0.06811286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06811286 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

0.0096326135 = product of:
  0.028897839 = sum of:
    0.028897839 = product of:
      0.057795677 = sum of:
        0.057795677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057795677 = score(doc=4441,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4441, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4441)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.2000 10:25:05

Series

Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.22

0.009081715 = product of:
  0.027245143 = sum of:
    0.027245143 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054490287 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 7.1998 18:00:49

0.009081715 = product of:
  0.027245143 = sum of:
    0.027245143 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054490287 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 7.1998 18:05:52

0.009081715 = product of:
  0.027245143 = sum of:
    0.027245143 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054490287 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Nach der Veröffentlichung einer deutschen Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification 22 im Oktober 2005 und ihrer Nutzung zur Inhaltserschließung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie seit Januar 2006 stellt sich aus Sicht der deutschen kunsthistorischen Spezialbibliotheken die Frage nach einer möglichen Verwendung der DDC und ihrer generellen Eignung zur Inhalterschließung kunsthistorischer Publikationen. Diese Frage wird vor dem Hintergrund der bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen für die Kunstgeschichte sowie mit Blick auf die inhaltlichen Besonderheiten, die Forschungsmethodik und die publizistischen Traditionen dieses Faches erörtert.

0.009081715 = product of:
  0.027245143 = sum of:
    0.027245143 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054490287 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

11. 9.2012 19:43:22

0.0089465715 = product of:
  0.026839713 = sum of:
    0.026839713 = weight(_text_:search in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026839713 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

While being theoretically so widely available, information can be restricted from a more general use by linguistic barriers. The linguistic aspects of the information languages and particularly the chances of an enhanced access to information by means of multilingual access facilities will make the substance of this thesis. The main problem of this research is thus to demonstrate that information retrieval can be improved by using multilingual thesaurus terms based on an intermediate or switching language to search with. Universal classification systems in general can play the role of switching languages for reasons dealt with in the forthcoming pages. The Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in particular is the classification system used as example of a switching language for our objectives. The question may arise: why a universal classification system and not another thesaurus? Because the UDC like most of the classification systems uses symbols. Therefore, it is language independent and the problems of compatibility between such a thesaurus and different other thesauri in different languages are avoided. Another question may still arise? Why not then, assign running numbers to the descriptors in a thesaurus and make a switching language out of the resulting enumerative system? Because of some other characteristics of the UDC: hierarchical structure and terminological richness, consistency and control. One big problem to find an answer to is: can a thesaurus be made having as a basis a classification system in any and all its parts? To what extent this question can be given an affirmative answer? This depends much on the attributes of the universal classification system which can be favourably used to this purpose. Examples of different situations will be given and discussed upon beginning with those classes of UDC which are best fitted for building a thesaurus structure out of them (classes which are both hierarchical and faceted)...

0.0089465715 = product of:
  0.026839713 = sum of:
    0.026839713 = weight(_text_:search in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026839713 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The amount and complexity of information available in a digital form is already huge and new information is being produced every day. Retrieving information relevant to address a particular need becomes a significant issue. This work utilizes knowledge organization systems (KOS), such as thesauri and ontologies and applies information extraction (IE) and computational linguistics (CL) techniques to organize, manage and retrieve information stored in digital collections in the agricultural domain. Two real world applications of the approach have been developed and are available and actively used by the public. An ontology is used to manage the Water Conservation Digital Library holding a dynamic collection of various types of digital resources in the domain of urban water conservation in Florida, USA. The ontology based back-end powers a fully operational web interface, available at http://library.conservefloridawater.org. The system has demonstrated numerous benefits of the ontology application, including accurate retrieval of resources, information sharing and reuse, and has proved to effectively facilitate information management. The major difficulty encountered with the approach is that large and dynamic number of concepts makes it difficult to keep the ontology consistent and to accurately catalog resources manually. To address the aforementioned issues, a combination of IE and CL techniques, such as Vector Space Model and probabilistic parsing, with the use of Agricultural Thesaurus were adapted to automatically extract concepts important for each of the texts in the Best Management Practices (BMP) Publication Library--a collection of documents in the domain of agricultural BMPs in Florida available at http://lyra.ifas.ufl.edu/LIB. A new approach of domain-specific concept discovery with the use of Internet search engine was developed. Initial evaluation of the results indicates significant improvement in precision of information extraction. The approach presented in this work focuses on problems unique to agriculture and natural resources domain, such as domain specific concepts and vocabularies, but should be applicable to any collection of texts in digital format. It may be of potential interest for anyone who needs to effectively manage a collection of digital resources.

0.0089465715 = product of:
  0.026839713 = sum of:
    0.026839713 = weight(_text_:search in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026839713 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05027291 = queryNorm
        0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Der Katalog der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek (ÖNB) hat, seit seiner ersten Erscheinungsform als Bandkatalog 1576, eine lange Entwicklung durchgemacht. Zu Beginn dieser Arbeit, im Historischen Abriss, wird kurz auf die Kataloggeschichte der ÖNB eingegangen, danach folgt die Darstellung der verschiedenen Retrokatalogisierungs- sowie den Katalogoptimierungsprojekten. Im Jahr 1997 stand die Retrokatalogisierung im Vordergrund, bei der die maschinengetippten Katalogzettel gescannt, OCR gelesen und über den KatZoom (eine Software-Eigenentwicklung) online zur Verfügung gestellt wurden. 1992 begann man mit der EDV-unterstützen Katalogisierung im Bibliothekssystem BIBOS. Mit der Umstellung 1999 auf das neue Bibliothekssystem Aleph500 wurden die Daten aus BIBOS als ONB01 in das neue System konvertiert. Im Jahr 2000 wurden der alte Nominalkatalog (1501-1929) und der dazugehörige Schlagwortkatalog konvertiert und als ONB02 nach Aleph500 migriert. Im darauffolgenden Jahr wurden auch der neue Nominalkatalog (1930-1991, sog. PI-Katalog) und der dazugehörende Schlagwortkatalog konvertiert und als ONB03 nach Aleph500 migriert. Parallel dazu wurden auch andere Sammlungskataloge, wie z.B. der Katalog in der Musiksammlung oder der Kartensammlung, bearbeitet. Für die Jahre 2007-2011 wurde ein Strategieplan zur Katalogoptimierung erarbeitet, der zum Ziel hatte, dass in Zukunft der Bestand über eine integrierte Gesamtsuche zugänglich sein soll. Dafür war die Implementierung von Suchmaschinen-Technologie für den OPAC geplant. Deswegen mussten in Folge die damals noch getrennten drei Druckschriftenkataloge (ONB01, ONB02 und ONB03) zusammengeführt werden. Zu diesem Zweck wurden zuerst in der ONB03 die Impressen aus dem Textblock herausgelöst. Dasselbe galt für die Impressen aus der ONB02. Danach wurden in beiden Katalogen die Verweisungen mit den dazugehörigen Hauptaufnahmen zusammengeführt. Schließlich wurden die beiden historischen Kataloge in die ONB01 migriert. Darauf folgte der Abgleich der Schlagworte aus der ONB03 mit der Schlagwortnormdatei. In Folge wurden auch die Schlagworte der ONB02 mit der Normdatei abgeglichen. Im April 2011 wurde dann die einheitliche Suchoberfläche Quick Search implementiert. Doch auch wichtige Projekte zur Kataloganreicherung (wie z.B. IV-Scan) und Projekte zur Massendigitalisierung, wie ANNO (Austrian Newspaper Online) und ALEX (Historische österreichische Rechts- und Gesetzestexte), werden in meiner Arbeit behandelt. Diese Master-These soll eine kompakte Zusammenfassung aller wichtigen Retro- und Katalogoptimierungsprojekte der ÖNB bieten.

0.007946501 = product of:
  0.0238395 = sum of:
    0.0238395 = product of:
      0.047679 = sum of:
        0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047679 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.2000 10:31:39

0.0068112854 = product of:
  0.020433856 = sum of:
    0.020433856 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040867712 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Pages

22 S

0.0068112854 = product of:
  0.020433856 = sum of:
    0.020433856 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040867712 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.0068112854 = product of:
  0.020433856 = sum of:
    0.020433856 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040867712 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

4. 2.2015 9:22:39