Search (48 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000) 0.07
    0.07295628 = product of:
      0.14591256 = sum of:
        0.1204711 = weight(_text_:sites in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1204711 = score(doc=5158,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.500197 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.02544146 = product of:
          0.05088292 = sum of:
            0.05088292 = weight(_text_:design in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088292 = score(doc=5158,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
  2. Rowland, M.J.: Web site design for indexers (2000) 0.07
    0.06923047 = product of:
      0.13846093 = sum of:
        0.1204711 = weight(_text_:sites in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1204711 = score(doc=225,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.500197 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Do indexers really need Web sites? No, they do not. Indexers do not need computers either. Indexes can be done on cards; networking can be done at conferences; and marketing can be done with cold calls. But, just as email has become indispensable to communication, and computers have become essential to indexing, so Web sites have become more and more necessary for all types of businesses, particularly small companies with small advertising budgets, like indexing businesses. The amount of business being conducted on the Web is increasing exponentially. Publishers, packagers, and other potential clients are beginning to search the Web for indexers. Why not participate in e-commerce, the newest way of doing business? A good Web site not only helps you obtain work, it increases your professional reputation and helps you influence the future of indexing. You can use your site as an online resume, to display a list of all the books you have indexed in the past year, to provide examples of your work, and to network with others. You can use it to express your philosophy of indexing, to teach others about indexing, and to make your voice heard on issues affecting the indexing profession. Not all indexers need Web sites, but active, involved, and far-sighted indexers, like you, do!
  3. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.04
    0.038008522 = product of:
      0.15203409 = sum of:
        0.15203409 = sum of:
          0.08141267 = weight(_text_:design in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08141267 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.46998373 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.070621416 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070621416 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  4. Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000) 0.03
    0.029509272 = product of:
      0.11803709 = sum of:
        0.11803709 = weight(_text_:sites in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11803709 = score(doc=222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.49009097 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
  5. Shumaker, L.E.: Indexing the California Home Page (1997) 0.03
    0.027821608 = product of:
      0.11128643 = sum of:
        0.11128643 = weight(_text_:sites in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11128643 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The California State Library has designed and executed the California Home Page, linking its topical outline to services and information supplied by many state agencies at their WWW sites. The project included the writing of 2 indexes to the outline and its links, one by topic and one by government agency or department. Describes planning and designing the indexes, choosing an index style, working tools used, the indexing process, and maintenance of the project
  6. Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006) 0.03
    0.027821608 = product of:
      0.11128643 = sum of:
        0.11128643 = weight(_text_:sites in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11128643 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
  7. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.03
    0.026876085 = product of:
      0.10750434 = sum of:
        0.10750434 = sum of:
          0.05756745 = weight(_text_:design in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05756745 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.049936883 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049936883 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  8. Walker, D.: AusSI Web indexing prizewinners (1997) 0.02
    0.024343908 = product of:
      0.09737563 = sum of:
        0.09737563 = weight(_text_:sites in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09737563 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.40430441 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the 26 entires to the 1996 Australian society of Indexers' (AusSI) Prize for Web indexes. Entries showed a variety of approaches to Web indexing and included: linear back-of-book style indexes; annotated bibliographies; Yahoo-style hierachical sites; and beautiful castles with rooms full of links. Entries were judges on ease of use of the index for a novice user, content and breadth of coverage, and usefulness at getting information that could answer questions. The winner was the Australian Parliamentary Library Index by Alan Wilson, an index to the information on the Commonwealth Parliamentary Library's Web site and from othe departments of the Australian Parliament. A brief description of each entrey is given together with its URL and the compiler's email address. All entries can be reached on the Web
  9. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.02
    0.023516573 = product of:
      0.09406629 = sum of:
        0.09406629 = sum of:
          0.050371516 = weight(_text_:design in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050371516 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.29078758 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.04369477 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04369477 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  10. Walker, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing (2000) 0.02
    0.020866206 = product of:
      0.08346482 = sum of:
        0.08346482 = weight(_text_:sites in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08346482 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    My goal in this short article is to bring you up to speed on Web indexing. I assume you are a person with good word skills and an inquisitive mind. Also, I assume you have good keyboard skills, access to the Internet, and have already created some HTML pages using, say, Netscape Composer. You may need help from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to upload pages onto your Web site. This article is based on my experience teaching an online interactive course in Web indexing for my company, WWWalker Web Development, in 1998. We develop Web sites, support Linux and Windows NT, write technical articles, and specialize in Web indexing.
  11. Hedden, H.: Indexing specialities : Web Sites (2007) 0.02
    0.018070666 = product of:
      0.072282664 = sum of:
        0.072282664 = weight(_text_:sites in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072282664 = score(doc=1146,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.3001182 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.4, S.245 (J. Fassbender): "Heather Heddens Buch über Website-Indexing gehört zur Indexing Specialties-Serie, die vom Information Today-Verlag in Zusammenarbeit mit der American Society of Indexers herausgegeben wird. Der Bereich Website-Indexing befasst sich mit der Index-Erstellung und -Pflege für Websites und Intranets - ähnlich zu Registern für Printpublikationen. Ein Website-Index hat oft die Bezeichnung Site Index oder A-Z Index und sollte zudem nicht mit Site Maps verwechselt werden. Das Buch füllt gerade auch hierzulande eine Riesenlücke aus: Nach Einschätzung des Deutschen Netzwerks der Indexer (DNI) ist das Wissensdefizit über Website-Indexing in der deutschen Web- und IT-Szene enorm. Die Autorin beginnt in diesem Sinne auch gleich mit zwei Kernaussagen des Buches: 1. Website-Indexing sei deshalb in der Web-Szene nicht so verbreitet, weil die Kenntnisse der Methoden zur Index-Erstellung fehlen und/oder die nötigen Tools unbekannt sind. 2. Ein guter Index stelle für viele Sites die effektivste Suchmethode dar - trotz der Konkurrenz zu Navigationsmenüs und Sucheingabe. Verdeutlicht werden sodann die Unterschiede zu Print-Registern, der bedeutendste betrifft die Locators (Fundstellen), die in der Regel keine Seitenangaben, sondern Links sind.
    Zwei Kapitel behandeln die Vorgehensweise bei der Index-Erstellung sowie die vielfältigen Aspekte der Index-Gestaltung. Anhand vieler Beispiele werden die Besonderheiten, aber auch Parallelen zu Printregistern beleuchtet, z. B. bestehende und neu einzufügende Anker, Berücksichtigung verschiedener Seiten-Arten und -Formate, Umgang mit mehreren Locatorn pro Eintrag, Navigation innerhalb des Site Indexes. Das Schlusskapitel widmet sich den Business-Aspekten des Website-Indexing, auch aus Freelancer-Sicht. Erläutert werden z. B., welche Arten von Websites in Frage kommen und wie die Fortführung der Indexierung berücksichtigt wird. Der Index des Buches ist insgesamt von guter Qualität, wie man es von den Indexing-Büchern des Information Today-Verlages gewöhnt ist - ja sogar von exzellenter Qualität im Vergleich zu vielen unzureichenden Registern deutschsprachiger Fachbücher. Mit fünf Prozent Umfang im Verhältnis zur Anzahl der inhaltlichen Seiten hat der Index eine gute Standardlänge. Wesentliche Indexierungstechniken, wie Untereinträge, siehe- und siehe auch-Querverweise, vollständige Seitenbereichsangaben (d. h. ohne die wenig hilfreichen ff.-Angaben) kommen zum Einsatz. Einige Untereinträge tauchen allerdings nicht auch als Haupteintrag auf; so findet man z. B. "indexing rates" nur als Untereintrag des Haupteintrages "Business and index market". Die typographische und satztechnische Qualität des Registers ist ebenfalls gut, z. B. unterschiedliche Einrückungen von Untereinträgen und deren Zeilenumbrüchen. Insgesamt gesehen ist Indexing Specialties: Web Sites ein sehr empfehlenswertes Buch, das ein wichtiges (und bisher vernachlässigtes) Thema abdeckt."
  12. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing, teaching of, See: Information retrieval design (2002) 0.01
    0.012592879 = product of:
      0.050371516 = sum of:
        0.050371516 = product of:
          0.10074303 = sum of:
            0.10074303 = weight(_text_:design in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10074303 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.58157516 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.012484221 = product of:
      0.049936883 = sum of:
        0.049936883 = product of:
          0.09987377 = sum of:
            0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09987377 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  14. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01
    0.012484221 = product of:
      0.049936883 = sum of:
        0.049936883 = product of:
          0.09987377 = sum of:
            0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09987377 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  15. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01
    0.012484221 = product of:
      0.049936883 = sum of:
        0.049936883 = product of:
          0.09987377 = sum of:
            0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09987377 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  16. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01
    0.012484221 = product of:
      0.049936883 = sum of:
        0.049936883 = product of:
          0.09987377 = sum of:
            0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09987377 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  17. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.010923693 = product of:
      0.04369477 = sum of:
        0.04369477 = product of:
          0.08738954 = sum of:
            0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08738954 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  18. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01
    0.010923693 = product of:
      0.04369477 = sum of:
        0.04369477 = product of:
          0.08738954 = sum of:
            0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08738954 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  19. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01
    0.010923693 = product of:
      0.04369477 = sum of:
        0.04369477 = product of:
          0.08738954 = sum of:
            0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08738954 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  20. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.010923693 = product of:
      0.04369477 = sum of:
        0.04369477 = product of:
          0.08738954 = sum of:
            0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08738954 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13