-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.03
0.029986273 = product of:
0.08995882 = sum of:
0.08995882 = sum of:
0.041814405 = weight(_text_:web in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041814405 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048144415 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization (2003)
0.01
0.014680902 = product of:
0.044042703 = sum of:
0.044042703 = weight(_text_:wide in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044042703 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22492146 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article is organized in 10 sections: (1) Knowledge Organization (KO) is a wide interdisciplinary field, muck broader than Library and Information Science (LIS). (2) Inside LIS there have been many different approaches and traditions of KO with little mutual influence. These traditions have to a large extent been defined by new technology, for which reason the theoretical integration and underpinning has not been well considered. The most important technology-driven traditions are: a) Manual indexing and classification in libraries and reference works, b) Documentation and scientific communication, c) Information storage and retrieval by computers, d) Citation based KO and e) Full text, hypertext and Internet based approaches. These traditions taken together define very muck the special LIS focus an KO. For KO as a field of research it is important to establish a fruitful theoretical frame of reference for this overall field. This paper provides some suggestions. (3) One important theoretical distinction to consider is the one between social and intellectual forms of KO. Social forms of KO are related to professional training, disciplines and social groups while intellectual organization is related to concepts and theories in the fields to be organized. (4) The social perspective includes in addition the systems of genres and documents as well as the social system of knowledge Producers, knowledge intermediaries and knowledge users. (5) This social system of documents, genres and agents makes available a very complicated structure of potential subject access points (SAPs), which may be used in information retrieval (IR). The basic alm of research in KO is to develop knowledge an how to optimise this system of SAPs and its utilization in IR. (6) SAPs may be seen as signs, and their production and use may be understood from a social semiotic point of view. (7) The concept of paradigms is also helpful because different groups and interests tend to be organized according to a paradigm and to develop different criteria of relevance, and thus different criteria of likeliness in KO. (8) The basic unit in KO is the semantic relation between two concepts, and such relations are embedded in theories. (9) In classification like things are grouped together, but what is considered similar is not a trivial question. (10) The paper concludes with the considering of methods for KO. Basically the methods of any field are connected with epistemological theories. This is also the case with KO. The existing methods as described in the literature of KO fit into a classification of basic epistemological views. The debate about the methods of KO at the deepest level therefore implies an epistemological discussion.
-
Araújo, P.C. de; Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hjoerland, B.: Citation indexing and indexes (2021)
0.01
0.008447785 = product of:
0.025343355 = sum of:
0.025343355 = product of:
0.05068671 = sum of:
0.05068671 = weight(_text_:web in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05068671 = score(doc=444,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A citation index is a bibliographic database that provides citation links between documents. The first modern citation index was suggested by the researcher Eugene Garfield in 1955 and created by him in 1964, and it represents an important innovation to knowledge organization and information retrieval. This article describes citation indexes in general, considering the modern citation indexes, including Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Crossref, Dimensions and some special citation indexes and predecessors to the modern citation index like Shepard's Citations. We present comparative studies of the major ones and survey theoretical problems related to the role of citation indexes as subject access points (SAP), recognizing the implications to knowledge organization and information retrieval. Finally, studies on citation behavior are presented and the influence of citation indexes on knowledge organization, information retrieval and the scientific information ecosystem is recognized.
- Object
- Web of Science
-
Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002)
0.01
0.0080240695 = product of:
0.024072208 = sum of:
0.024072208 = product of:
0.048144415 = sum of:
0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048144415 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 7.2006 14:11:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.01
0.006877774 = product of:
0.020633321 = sum of:
0.020633321 = product of:
0.041266643 = sum of:
0.041266643 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041266643 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Hjoerland, B.: Knowledge organization = Information organization? (2012)
0.01
0.005973486 = product of:
0.017920459 = sum of:
0.017920459 = product of:
0.035840917 = sum of:
0.035840917 = weight(_text_:web in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035840917 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Are the terms information organization (IO), organization of information (OI) and information architecture (IA) synonyms for knowledge organization (KO)? This study uses bibliometric methods, among others, to determine some relations between these terms and their meanings. Apparently the data shows that these terms should not be considered synonyms because each of the terms IO, OI, IA and KO produce a different set of high ranked authors, journals and papers. In many cases the terms are, however, used interchangeably (and thus indicating synonymity) and it is argued that the underlying theoretical principles are identical but that the different terms tend to be applied in different contexts: KO in the library context; IA in the web-context and IO and OI in more unspecified ways.
-
Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013)
0.01
0.0057314783 = product of:
0.017194435 = sum of:
0.017194435 = product of:
0.03438887 = sum of:
0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438887 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:49:13
-
Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014)
0.01
0.0057314783 = product of:
0.017194435 = sum of:
0.017194435 = product of:
0.03438887 = sum of:
0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438887 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022)
0.01
0.0057314783 = product of:
0.017194435 = sum of:
0.017194435 = product of:
0.03438887 = sum of:
0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438887 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 18.11.2023 13:47:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009)
0.00
0.0028657392 = product of:
0.0085972175 = sum of:
0.0085972175 = product of:
0.017194435 = sum of:
0.017194435 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017194435 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:13:27
