-
Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989)
0.03
0.02569158 = product of:
0.07707474 = sum of:
0.07707474 = weight(_text_:wide in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07707474 = score(doc=3516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22492146 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Report of a study comparing 2 methods of indexing: LEXINET, a computerised system for indexing titles and summaries only; and manual indexing of full texts, using the thesaurus developed by French Electricity (EDF). Both systems were applied to a collection of approximately 2.000 documents on artifical intelligence from the EDF data base. The results were then analysed to compare quantitative performance (number and range of terms) and qualitative performance (ambiguity of terms, specificity, variability, consistency). Overall, neither system proved ideal: LEXINET was deficient as regards lack of accessibility and excessive ambiguity; while the manual system gave rise to an over-wide variation of terms. The ideal system would appear to be a combination of automatic and manual systems, on the evidence produced here.
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.03
0.0255426 = product of:
0.0766278 = sum of:
0.0766278 = sum of:
0.04223893 = weight(_text_:web in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04223893 = score(doc=1781,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438887 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Rowley, J.: ¬The controlled versus natural indexing languages debate revisited : a perspective on information retrieval practice and research (1994)
0.02
0.018351128 = product of:
0.055053383 = sum of:
0.055053383 = weight(_text_:wide in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055053383 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22492146 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article revisits the debate concerning controlled and natural indexing languages, as used in searching the databases of the online hosts, in-house information retrieval systems, online public access catalogues and databases stored on CD-ROM. The debate was first formulated in the early days of information retrieval more than a century ago but, despite significant advance in technology, remains unresolved. The article divides the history of the debate into four eras. Era one was characterised by the introduction of controlled vocabulary. Era two focused on comparisons between different indexing languages in order to assess which was best. Era three saw a number of case studies of limited generalisability and a general recognition that the best search performance can be achieved by the parallel use of the two types of indexing languages. The emphasis in Era four has been on the development of end-user-based systems, including online public access catalogues and databases on CD-ROM. Recent developments in the use of expert systems techniques to support the representation of meaning may lead to systems which offer significant support to the user in end-user searching. In the meantime, however, information retrieval in practice involves a mixture of natural and controlled indexing languages used to search a wide variety of different kinds of databases
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.01
0.013755548 = product of:
0.041266643 = sum of:
0.041266643 = product of:
0.082533285 = sum of:
0.082533285 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082533285 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.0091703655 = product of:
0.027511096 = sum of:
0.027511096 = product of:
0.05502219 = sum of:
0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05502219 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.0080240695 = product of:
0.024072208 = sum of:
0.024072208 = product of:
0.048144415 = sum of:
0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048144415 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.01
0.0080240695 = product of:
0.024072208 = sum of:
0.024072208 = product of:
0.048144415 = sum of:
0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048144415 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.01
0.006877774 = product of:
0.020633321 = sum of:
0.020633321 = product of:
0.041266643 = sum of:
0.041266643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041266643 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.01
0.006877774 = product of:
0.020633321 = sum of:
0.020633321 = product of:
0.041266643 = sum of:
0.041266643 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041266643 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.01
0.0057314783 = product of:
0.017194435 = sum of:
0.017194435 = product of:
0.03438887 = sum of:
0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438887 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
0.0022925914 = product of:
0.006877774 = sum of:
0.006877774 = product of:
0.013755548 = sum of:
0.013755548 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013755548 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050763648 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
