Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Park, J.-r."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.10
    0.10286856 = product of:
      0.20573711 = sum of:
        0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031359423 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.039323866 = weight(_text_:computer in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039323866 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.13505383 = sum of:
          0.09894711 = weight(_text_:programs in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09894711 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044416238 = queryNorm
              0.38428974 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.03610672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03610672 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044416238 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  2. Park, J.-r.; Maszaros, S.: Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) in digital repositories : an exploratory study of metadata use and quality (2009) 0.03
    0.031418316 = product of:
      0.09425494 = sum of:
        0.06812209 = weight(_text_:wide in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06812209 = score(doc=3258,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
        0.026132854 = weight(_text_:web in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026132854 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the use of the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) within three digital collections. It identifies the MODS metadata elements that evidence the most frequently occurring inconsistent and inaccurate application. For this, a total of sixty metadata records (twenty from each collection) were collected. The surveyed collections cover a wide range of material from digitized sound recordings and monographs, pre-1800 imprints to born-digital web resources. As a means of comparison in evaluating the quality of the metadata, local guidelines for the MODS metadata application are also consulted in order to determine the usage of MODS metadata elements in local collections against the guidelines. Analysis of the surveyed data drawn from the three collections shows that the five most frequently used elements (titleInfo, originInfo, recordInfo, physicalDescription and subject) appeared in 86 percent of the records. The total number of MODS elements represented in each collection ranged from twelve to fifteen (out of 20 MODS top-elements). Results of this study indicate that the MODS metadata scheme is suitable for describing a wide range of materials and resource types. The results also indicate that easily accessible local guidelines for metadata creation contribute significantly to the consistent and accurate application of the MODS metadata scheme.
  3. Park, J.-r.: Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer-mediated communication : part 1: a theoretical framework (2008) 0.01
    0.0065539777 = product of:
      0.039323866 = sum of:
        0.039323866 = weight(_text_:computer in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039323866 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  4. Park, J.-r.: Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer-mediated communication : part 2: an application of the theoretical framework (2008) 0.01
    0.005461648 = product of:
      0.03276989 = sum of:
        0.03276989 = weight(_text_:computer in 2684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03276989 = score(doc=2684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.20188503 = fieldWeight in 2684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2684)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Park, J.-r.: Metadata quality in digital repositories : a survey of the current state of the art (2009) 0.01
    0.0052265706 = product of:
      0.031359423 = sum of:
        0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031359423 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study presents the current state of research and practice on metadata quality through focus on the functional perspective on metadata quality, measurement and evaluation criteria coupled with mechanisms for improving metadata quality. Quality metadata reflect the degree to which the metadata in question perform the core bibliographic functions of discovery, use, provenance, currency, authentication and administration. The functional perspective is closely tied to the criteria and measurements used for assessing metadata quality. Accuracy, completeness and consistency are the most common criteria used in measuring metadata quality in literature. Guidelines embedded within a web form or template perform a valuable function in improving the quality of the metadata. Results of the study indicate a pressing need for the building of a common data model that is interoperable across digital repositories.
  6. Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007) 0.00
    0.0040118583 = product of:
      0.024071148 = sum of:
        0.024071148 = product of:
          0.048142295 = sum of:
            0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048142295 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22