Search (133 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  1. DeRoure, D.: ¬An open framework for collaborative distributed information management (1998) 0.12
    0.124078624 = product of:
      0.18611793 = sum of:
        0.067437425 = weight(_text_:wide in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067437425 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.05174041 = weight(_text_:web in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05174041 = score(doc=3557,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.04587784 = weight(_text_:computer in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04587784 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.021062255 = product of:
          0.04212451 = sum of:
            0.04212451 = weight(_text_:22 in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04212451 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    The MEMOIR project supports researchers working with a vast quantity of distributed information, by assisting them in finding both relevant documents and researchers with related interests. It is an open architecture based on the existing Web infrastructure. Key to the architecture is the use of proxies: to support message routing for dynamic reconfiguration and extension of the system, to collect information about the trail of documents that a user visits, and to insert links on the fly. Presents the MEMOIR framework and its rationale, and discusses early experiences with the system
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.624-625
  2. Wiley, D.L.: ¬The organizational politics of the World Wide Web (1998) 0.08
    0.080137186 = product of:
      0.16027437 = sum of:
        0.07707134 = weight(_text_:wide in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07707134 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
        0.059131898 = weight(_text_:web in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059131898 = score(doc=2778,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
        0.024071148 = product of:
          0.048142295 = sum of:
            0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048142295 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The international conflicts within an organization may hinder the successful design and set up of a WWW site. Looks at the 3 most common routes that an organization may take to get on the Web, and presents guidelines for how to overcome the organizational politics that get in the way
    Date
    22. 1.1999 18:41:46
  3. Fensel, D.: Ontologies : a silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2004) 0.08
    0.076705165 = product of:
      0.15341033 = sum of:
        0.06812209 = weight(_text_:wide in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06812209 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
        0.064012155 = weight(_text_:web in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064012155 = score(doc=1949,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
        0.02127609 = product of:
          0.04255218 = sum of:
            0.04255218 = weight(_text_:22 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04255218 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The author systematically introduces the notion of ontologies to the non-expert reader and demonstrates in detail how to apply this conceptual framework for improved intranet retrieval of corporate information and knowledge and for enhanced Internetbased electronic commerce. He also describes ontology languages (XML, RDF, and OWL) and ontology tools, and the application of ontologies. In addition to structural improvements, the second edition covers recent developments relating to the Semantic Web, and emerging web-based standard languages.
    Classification
    004.67/8 22
    DDC
    004.67/8 22
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Datenbanksystem / Abfrage / Inferenz <Künstliche Intelligenz>
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Datenbanksystem / Abfrage / Inferenz <Künstliche Intelligenz>
    Semantic Web
  4. Mentzas, G.: ¬A functional taxonomy of computer-based information systems (1994) 0.04
    0.044626735 = product of:
      0.1338802 = sum of:
        0.09175568 = weight(_text_:computer in 6819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09175568 = score(doc=6819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.56527805 = fieldWeight in 6819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6819)
        0.04212451 = product of:
          0.08424902 = sum of:
            0.08424902 = weight(_text_:22 in 6819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08424902 = score(doc=6819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 13:34:22
  5. Scott, J.E.: Organizational knowledge and the Intranet (2002) 0.04
    0.042828932 = product of:
      0.085657865 = sum of:
        0.03853567 = weight(_text_:wide in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03853567 = score(doc=4246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
        0.020906283 = weight(_text_:web in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020906283 = score(doc=4246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
        0.02621591 = weight(_text_:computer in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02621591 = score(doc=4246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.16150802 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Intranet has been hailed as the solution to organizational technology issues as far reaching as faster information systems development, access to legacy system data, integration of incompatible systems, and progress toward the "paperless office." Moreover, intranets enable work-flow management and project management and are a platform for process redesign. Yet possibly the most far-reaching impact of the Intranet is an organizational knowledge. Intranets are providing institutions and organizations with opportunities to create knowledge. A large proportion of the pioneers are high-technology companies making use of intranets for knowledge-intensive new product development. Intranets enable community expertise to develop, as engineers brainstorm and give each other feedback in discussion groups and share product specifications and product test result queries. The scope of interest in intranets is evidenced by diverse articles and applications in the medical, legal, engineering, training, travel, technical, computer-related, and manufacturing industries. Although some definitions restrict intranets to internal information an internal webs accessed exclusively by internal users, in this article, we adopt a broader definition that includes customers and suppliers in the extended enterprise [also called an "Extranet"] and industrywide applications. Thus, an intranet is a "powerful tool for institution-wide communications, collaborative projects, and the establishment of a sense of community an a manageable scale". Despite the fact that many organizations have adopted the Intranet with great enthusiasm and there has been an avalanche of Web and journalistic articles an the Intranet since the end of 1995, theoretical research has been lacking. Evidence of the business value of the Intranet has been convincing but largely anecdotal. In addition, negative reports have surfaced an hidden costs, performance limitations, and organizational resistance. Such issues have been researched with political theories that explain how some constituents gain and others lose when there is organizational change associated with information technology (IT) implementation. Organizational learning theories also explain such contradictions by examining what affects the creation, integration, and management of knowledge and the facilitation of organizational memory. For example, the theory of organizational knowledge creation posits that autonomy, intention, redundancy, fluctuation and creative chaos, and requisite variety are conditions that induce the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge in a spiral from individual to group, to organization levels. The findings from this analysis of reported implementations of intranets generate a theoretically based model relating organizational kowledge to the Intranet phenomenon. We extend the inductive concepts by analyzing example of enabling conditions and organizational knowledge creation modes an intranets, using Nonaka's theory of organizational knowledge creation as a guide. Our contribution is to develop a theoretical understanding of the Intranet phenomenon, with an initial framework to guide further conceptual and empirical research an the impacts and business value of the Intranet and to present implications for information systems (IS) developers, IS departments, management, and researchers.
  6. Fensel, D.: Ontologies : a silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2001) 0.04
    0.042185646 = product of:
      0.12655693 = sum of:
        0.06812209 = weight(_text_:wide in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06812209 = score(doc=163,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
        0.05843484 = weight(_text_:web in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05843484 = score(doc=163,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies have been developed and investigated for quite a while now in artificial intelligente and natural language processing to facilitate knowledge sharing and reuse. More recently, the notion of ontologies has attracied attention from fields such as intelligent information integration, cooperative information systems, information retrieval, electronic commerce, and knowledge management. The author systematicaliy introduces the notion of ontologies to the non-expert reader and demonstrates in detail how to apply this conceptual framework for improved intranet retrieval of corporate information and knowledge and for enhanced Internet-based electronic commerce. In the second part of the book, the author presents a more technical view an emerging Web standards, like XML, RDF, XSL-T, or XQL, allowing for structural and semantic modeling and description of data and information.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Datenbanksystem / Abfrage / Inferenz <Künstliche Intelligenz>
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Datenbanksystem / Abfrage / Inferenz <Künstliche Intelligenz>
    Semantic Web
  7. Schilp, H.: Content-Broking : Handel mit digitalen Inhalten (2005) 0.04
    0.04203181 = product of:
      0.12609543 = sum of:
        0.0817465 = weight(_text_:wide in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0817465 = score(doc=3498,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
        0.04434892 = weight(_text_:web in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04434892 = score(doc=3498,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Internet ist Content; und Content war zu Beginn des Internet alles, was sich durch die enge Telefonleitung zum Kunden transportieren ließ - also Texte und kleine Bilder. Mehr war der analogen Datentechnik damals nicht zuzumuten. Erst ISDN machte mit bis zu 128 Kilobit/Sekunde (kbps) Tempo, war aber recht teuer. Wer für die freie Fahrt auf der Datenautobahn beide ISDN-Leitungen aktivierte, produzierte doppelte Online-Kosten. Trotzdem galt das World Wide Web als digitales Schlaraffenland. Bis auf einige Profi-Datenbanken waren die Inhalte kostenlos. Wie aber lassen sich Inhalte im Internet versilbern? Die Frage, wie Content-Broking - also die Vermittlung von Inhalten - erfolgreich funktioniert, bewegt Marketingprofis seitdem das World Wide Web existiert. Zunächst ging es aber um Präsenz im Internet: Marktanteile und Kundenbindung waren die beherrschenden Themen, weniger der ökonomische Erfolg. Am 25. Oktober 1994 präsentierte sich Der Spiegel als erstes Nachrichtenmagazin weltweit online - einen Tag vor dem amerikanischen Time Magazine - und eröffnete das Wettrennen.
  8. Koenemann, J.; Lindner, H.-G.; Thomas, C.: Unternehmensportale : Von Suchmaschinen zum Wissensmanagement (2000) 0.04
    0.039725944 = product of:
      0.11917783 = sum of:
        0.067437425 = weight(_text_:wide in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067437425 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
        0.05174041 = weight(_text_:web in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05174041 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Aufgabe des Wissensmanagements ist es, den Mitarbeitern im Unternehmen entscheidungs- und handlungsrelevante Informationen bereitzustellen und die Mitarbeiter bei der intelligenten Verarbeitung dieser Informationen zu unterstützen. Ein hierzu genutztes Werkzeug von wachsender Bedeutung sind Unternehmensportale. Wir beschreiben kurz die Entwicklung von Portalen im World Wide Web (WWW), um dann Web-Portale von verschiedenen Arten von Unternehmensportalen abzugrenzen. Wir zeigen erwartete Funktionalitäten auf und stellen ein 5-Schichten Modell einer Gesamtarchitektur für Portale dar, welche die wesentlichen Komponenten umfasst. Im Anschluss werden die Besonderheiten der organisatorischen Realisierung und im Ausblick der Übergang von Portalen zum ,ubiquitous personalized information supply", der überall verfügbaren und individuellen Informationsversorgung behandelt
  9. Solomon, M.: Knowledge management tools for knowledge managers : filling the gap between finding information and applying it (1997) 0.04
    0.03592577 = product of:
      0.1077773 = sum of:
        0.041812565 = weight(_text_:web in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041812565 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
        0.065964736 = product of:
          0.13192947 = sum of:
            0.13192947 = weight(_text_:programs in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13192947 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25748047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.5123863 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.79699 = idf(docFreq=364, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge management is the key to corporate success. Offers guidelines for defining the usefulness of information management programs in the knowledge discovery process. Covers: automating the knowledge delivery process through collection, synthesis and presentation, and evaluates askSam Professional 3.0 from askSam Systems, KnowIt-all 2.0 from Gap Information and Web Retrieve 2.1 from Folio Corp.
  10. Macarthur, P.J.; Crosslin, R.L.; Warren, J.R.: ¬A strategy for evaluating alternative information system designs for business process reengineering (1994) 0.03
    0.03237579 = product of:
      0.09712737 = sum of:
        0.057803504 = weight(_text_:wide in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057803504 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
        0.039323866 = weight(_text_:computer in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039323866 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Many US companies are looking to business processing reengineering (BPR) - a process of redesign that is dramatic, company-wide, and often information technology oriented - in order to compete in the global marketplace. Given the scope and importance of BPR work, it is critical that there should be some objective measures applied to determining which possible changes shouldbe made in business' processes. Computer simulation technology is well suited to this design assessment role. Use of simulation, entails varieties of data collection that go beyond the information generally gathered in a BPR analysis. Once in use, simulation models encourage a culture of measurement that supports continuous process improvement. Recommends explicit attention to and management of the modelling tasks: data collection and organization; simulation of component designs, and integration of component simulation results
  11. Stock, W.G.: Informationswirtschaft : Management externen Wissens (2000) 0.03
    0.029720977 = product of:
      0.08916293 = sum of:
        0.057803504 = weight(_text_:wide in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057803504 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
        0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031359423 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: (1) Informationswirtschaft in der Informationsgesellschaft (2) Informationen und Informationskanäle (3) Hilfsmittel der Wirtschaftsdokumentation: Klassifikation und Thesaurus (4) Retrieval von elektronischen Informationen: Techniken und Strategien (5) Data Mining bei externen Informationen (6) Automatische Indexierung (7) Suchen und Browsen im World Wide Web (8) Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Informationen: Literaturnachweise und Volltexte (9) Ergebnisse der Marktforschung (10) Wirtschaftsnachrichten: Agenturmeldungen - Zeitungen - Newsletter - Pressearchive (11) Betriebswirtschaftliche Unternehmensinformationen (12) Ausschreibungen und Geschäftsanbahnungen (13) 'Selbstdarstellungen' von Unternehmen: Geschäftsberichte und Homepages (14) Gesetze und Urteile (15) Gewerbliche Schutzrechte als Wirtschaftsinformationen: Patente, Gebrauchsmuster, Marken, Geschmacksmuster (16) Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten von Unternehmen (17) Personenbezogene Informationen in Datenbanken (18) Wirtschaftsstatistische Zeitreihen (19) Integration externer Informationen in das betriebliche Informationssystem (20) Fallstudien
  12. Holsapple, C.W.: Knowledge management in decision making and decision support (1995) 0.03
    0.02550099 = product of:
      0.07650297 = sum of:
        0.05243182 = weight(_text_:computer in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05243182 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
        0.024071148 = product of:
          0.048142295 = sum of:
            0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048142295 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a knowledge management oriented view of decisions and decisioning as a complement to classical perspectives and as a contribution to understanding computer based possibilities for relaxing strains on decision makers. The perspective includes a model of knowledge management activities performed by a decision maker and a taxonomy of knowledge types. This leads to a characterization of decision support system purposes, traits and potentials that offer a basis for new research into computerized possibilities for knowledge management
    Source
    Knowledge and policy. 8(1995) no.1, S.5-22
  13. Kocamustafaogullari, K.: Computer aided management for information processing projects (1995) 0.03
    0.02550099 = product of:
      0.07650297 = sum of:
        0.05243182 = weight(_text_:computer in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05243182 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
        0.024071148 = product of:
          0.048142295 = sum of:
            0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048142295 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:40:59
  14. Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001) 0.02
    0.02476748 = product of:
      0.07430244 = sum of:
        0.04816959 = weight(_text_:wide in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04816959 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
        0.026132854 = weight(_text_:web in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026132854 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Der deutsche Markt für Elektronische Informationsdienste im Jahre 2000 - Ergebnisse einer Umsatzerhebung - Von Willi Bredemeier: - Abgesicherte Methodologie unter Berücksichtigung der Spezifika des EIS-Marktes und der aktuellen Entwicklung - teilweise Vergleichbarkeit der Daten ab 1989 - Weitgehende quantitative Markttransparenz, da der Leser die Aggregationen der Markt- und Teilmarktdaten aus einzelwirtschaftlichen Daten voll nachvollziehen kann - 93 zum Teil ausführliche Tabellen vorwiegend zu einzelnen Informationsanbietern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Geschäftsjahre 2000 und 1999, unterteilt in die Bereiche Gesamtmarkt für Elektronische Informationsdienste, Datev, Realtime-Finanzinformationen, Nachrichtenagenturen, Kreditinformationen, Firmen- und Produktinformationen, weitere Wirtschaftsinformationen, Rechtsinformationen, Wissenschaftlich-technisch-medizinische Informationen - Intellectual Property, Konsumentendienste, Nachbarmärkte - Analyse aktueller Markttrends. Qualität professioneller Firmeninformationen im World Wide Web - Von Mechtild Stock und Wolfgang G. Stock: - Weiterführung der Qualitätsdiskussion und Entwicklung eines Systems von Qualitätskriterien für Informationsangebote, bezogen auf Firmeninformationen im Internet - "Qualitätspanel" für die Bereiche Bonitätsinformationen, Firmenkurzdossiers, Produktinformationen und Adressinformationen mit den Anbietern Bürgel, Creditreform, Dun & Bradstreet Deutschland, ABC online, ALLECO, Hoppenstedt Firmendatenbank, Who is Who in Multimedia, Kompass Deutschland, Sachon Industriedaten, Wer liefert was?, AZ Bertelsmann, Schober.com - Hochdifferenzierte Tests, die den Kunden Hilfen bei der Auswahl zwischen Angeboten und den Anbietern Hinweise auf Maßnahmen zu qualitativen Verbesserungen geben - Detaillierte Informationen über eingesetzte Systeme der Branchen- und Produktklassifikationen - Rankings der Firmeninformationsanbieter insgesamt sowie nach Datenbasen, Retrievalsystemen und Websites, Detailinformationen zu allen Qualitätsdimensionen
  15. Rüegger, R.: ¬Die Qualität der virtuellen Information als Wettbewerbsvorteil : Information im Internet ist Sprache - noch (2000) 0.02
    0.024123162 = product of:
      0.072369486 = sum of:
        0.054316122 = weight(_text_:web in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054316122 = score(doc=5563,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
        0.01805336 = product of:
          0.03610672 = sum of:
            0.03610672 = weight(_text_:22 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610672 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Web ist zur Tatsache geworden. Und mit dem Web entstand eine boornende Industrie, die viel zu erzählen hat, einiges leistet, den Marketingmix eines Unternehmens völlig verändert oder gar ganze Geschäftsprozesse neu definiert hat. Aber es entstand auch eine Industrie, die eines völlig aus den Augen verloren hat: Nach der Technik und nach dem Screen Design wird erst zaghaft an die mediumgerechte Ansprache des Kunden gedacht. Erst jetzt wird der Stellenwert von schriftlicher Information als "mission critical" bewertet. So ist bereits heute abzusehen, dass nach den fehlenden IT-Fachkräften demnächst der Ruf nach fähigen Web-Schreiberlingen laut werden dürfte. Denn Revolutionen auf dem Gebiet der Sprachtechnologie können erst stattfinden, wenn die Qualität der Inhalte entsprechend hoch ist
    Pages
    S.17-22
  16. Lan, Z.; Scott, C.R.: ¬The relative importance of computer-mediated information versus conventional non-computer-mediated information in public managerial decision making (1996) 0.02
    0.019540187 = product of:
      0.117241114 = sum of:
        0.117241114 = weight(_text_:computer in 4763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117241114 = score(doc=4763,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.7222858 = fieldWeight in 4763, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4763)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the relevance of computer mediated information to organizational decision making in state and local government agencies. Examines the extent to which computer mediated information is available, and utilized by, organizational dacision makers when compared to more conventional information media such as formal upper management directives, person to person conversations, or personal knowledge. Computer mediated information plays an important role in organizational decision making, even though its utilization is perceived to be less than its availability
  17. Ballay, J.-F.; Poitou, J.-P.: Diademe : a collective knowledge management system (CKMS) (1996) 0.02
    0.019125743 = product of:
      0.057377227 = sum of:
        0.039323866 = weight(_text_:computer in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039323866 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16231956 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
        0.01805336 = product of:
          0.03610672 = sum of:
            0.03610672 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610672 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The rationale and the general outline of a system for the management of collective knowledge (CKMS) has been presented by Poitou at ISMICK 95. The features of a CKMS are quite closely implemented in DIADEME, a computer assisted system for the capitalization and the management of research engineers' knowledge, which has been designed, developed and is currently being implemented at Electricité de France (EDF) by Ballay. During Spring 1995, Poitou has conducted at EDF a survey of the engineers' knowledge management behavior, of their attitudes toward a prospective CKMS. During Spring 1996, Poitou conducted a survey among the same engineers about their users' reactions to the implementation of DIADEME. The present paper briefly sums up the main features of a CKMS, (Section 1) describes the aims and the general architecture of DIADEME (Section 4), and gives some insight into the results of the 1995 users' expectation survey (Section 3) and of the 1996 users' satisfaction survey (Section 5).
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  18. Palme, K.: Grundlagen, Bedeutung und Chancen von B2B (2001) 0.02
    0.017337238 = product of:
      0.052011713 = sum of:
        0.033718713 = weight(_text_:wide in 5867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033718713 = score(doc=5867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.171337 = fieldWeight in 5867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5867)
        0.018292999 = weight(_text_:web in 5867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018292999 = score(doc=5867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 5867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5867)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Unternehmen und Betriebe der Wirtschaft versuchen zunehmend unter dem Stichwort E-Commerce oder Business to Business (B2B) betriebliche Vorgänge und Arbeitsabläufe innerbetrieblich, aber auch nach aussen hin zu Kunden und Lieferanten über das Internet elektronisch abzuwickeln. Der Einsatz von B2B hängt aber letztlich von verschiedenen Faktoren ab, die mit dem Internet in unmittelbarem Zusammenhang stehen. Im Prinzip sind inzwischen Mio. von Rechnern mehr oder weniger wahllos miteinander vernetzt. Eine Zentrale gibt es nicht. Das World Wide Web bietet eine Fülle von Informationen an. Es ist insgesamt multimedial und ermöglicht es praktisch jedem, sowohl einer Einzelperson als auch einem Unternehmen, Informationsangebote aller Art im Internet zu nutzen. Hohe Bedeutung gewinnen elektronische Märkte, deren Zahl laufend zunimmt (vgl. www.deutsche-wirtschaft.de). Systematisiert man die Möglichkeiten des E-Commerce und der elektronischen Märkte, so gibt es drei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten: Business-to-Business (B2B): Zwei oder mehr Unternehmen wickeln elektronische Beschaffungsvorgänge voll elektronisch ab. Dies bedeutet, dass Käufer und Lieferanten sich finden, entsprechende Angebote erstellen und aushandeln müssen und die Abwicklung der Geschäftsvorgänge elektronisch durchführen. Business-to-Consumer (B2C): Ein gewerblicher Partner bietet seine Produkte und Dienstleistungen gewerblich an, die Kunden sind in der Regel Privatpersonen. Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C): Hier versuchen Privatleute miteinander zu kommunizieren, Waren auszutauschen oder privat zu verkaufen. Man könnte das auch einen »elektronischen Flohmarkt« nennen. Von wirtschaftlich herausragender Bedeutung ist der Bereich B2B. Wenn es gelingt, große Teile des bisherigen Einkaufverhaltens der Industrie über B2B abzuwickeln, können erhebliche Transaktionskosten auf beiden Seiten, beim Kunden und beim Lieferanten, eingespart werden. Die chaotische Struktur des Internet ermöglicht nur begrenzt die zielorientierte Suche. Gesucht wird in der Regel über Worte und Begriffe, die jedoch von Käufern und Verkäufern häufig in unterschiedlicher Weise genutzt werden. Beispielsweise sucht ein Käufer nach Kugelschreibern, während der Verkäufer von Schreibgeräten spricht. Allein die sprachliche Differenz verhindert einen zielorientierten Kontakt. Voraussetzung für eine gezielte Suche ist deshalb eine gemeinsame »Sprache« zwischen dem bestellenden Ingenieur, dem Einkäufer oder Lieferanten. Führende deutsche Unternehmen haben deshalb eine Klassifikation erarbeitet, die zum weltweiten Industriestandard zwischen Lieferanten und Kunden werden soll - eCl@ss. Das Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln hat die Aufgabe übernommen, mit der Klassifikation eCI@ss allen interessierten Unternehmen eine Unterlage anzubieten, durch die B2B und die Nutzung von elektronischen Märkten sinnvoll erfolgen kann. eCI@ss bietet einerseits die Lösung für das Suchen und Finden über eine achtstellige Klassifikationsnummer, durch die das Sprachproblem gelöst wird. Sowohl der Begriff »Handy« als auch »Mobiltelefon« oder Junktelefon« wird durch eine achtstellige Nummer ersetzt, so dass beide Seiten, Anbieter und Suchende, über diese Nummer sich ohne weitere Schwierigkeiten finden (eCI@ss12345678). Ist der Kontakt gefunden, bietet eCl@ss mit Hilfe von Merkmalen zu den verschiedenen Produkten die Möglichkeit, das eigene Angebot über Merkmale präzise zu beschreiben und damit auch Qualitätsangaben einzufügen. Um die Merkmale eindeutig zu identifizieren, werden auch Werte zugeliefert
  19. Lissack, M.R.: Chaos and complexity : what does that have to do with knowledge management? (1996) 0.02
    0.016857082 = product of:
      0.050571244 = sum of:
        0.03853567 = weight(_text_:wide in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03853567 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
        0.012035574 = product of:
          0.024071148 = sum of:
            0.024071148 = weight(_text_:22 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024071148 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    As interest in the study of complex systems has grown, a new vocabulary is emerging to describe discoveries about wide-ranging and fundamental phenomena. Complexity theory research has allowed for new insights into many phenomena and for the development of a new language. 'his paper argues that a shared language based an the vocabulary of complexity can have an important role in a management context. The use of complexity theory metaphors can change the way managers think about the problems they face. Instead of competing in a game or a war, they are trying to find their way an an ever changing, ever turbulent landscape. Such a conception of their organizations' basic task can, in cum, change the day-to-day decisions made by management. If part of the problem of knowledge management is the need to identify value added knowledge, language and metaphor play a key role - for they are the very tools of the identification [what is knowledge] and ascription [what makes it value-added] process. Complexity theory metaphors, it is argued, are not panaceas. There are limits to the types of organizations where the notion of a "fitness landscape" and "degree of coupling" can make a positive contribution to managements understanding of the world. The author argues that one potential distinction - between worlds where complexity metaphors can contribute and those where they cannot - can be drawn by measuring the degree to which an organization perceives that value-added investments are to be made in a) the development of new knowledge or b) infrastructure. In this context, infrastructure is defined as those items to which an economist might (once such investment is made) ascribe the label "sunk costs", but which management would not willingly walk away from. For this purpose then, emotional investments, legacy systems, existing bureaucracy, and material goods could all constitute "infrastructure". Infrastructure investments it is argued are pari of what Brian Arthur of the Sante Fe Institute defines as the world of diminishing retums. Investments in knowledge are different. While the ability of an organization to effectively deal wich new knowledge is limited by a variety of constraints, the leverage which can be obtained from such knowledge gives rise to the potential for increasing retums. As organizations leam to remove some of the constraints an their ability to absorb and lever new information, they force themselves down to the increasing retums part of the "S" curve. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the potency of complexity metaphors in driving managerial perceptions of knowledge management businesses.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  20. Fill, H.-G.; Karagiannis, D.; Lischka, J.: Web-Services und Geschäftsprozesse im Semantic Web (2006) 0.02
    0.015582624 = product of:
      0.09349574 = sum of:
        0.09349574 = weight(_text_:web in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09349574 = score(doc=5802,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Zusammenhänge von Web-Services, Geschäftsprozessen und Semantic Web aus Sicht der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Ausgehend von wirtschaftsinformatischen Konzepten wird auf das Mediationspotential von semantischen Technologien, aktuelle Rahmenwerke zur Umsetzung und erste Ansätze für eine wirtschaftliche Betrachtung der aktuell diskutierten Technologien eingegangen. Anhand eines konkreten Fallbeispieles aus dem universitären Umfeld werden abschliessend die theoretischen Konzepte praktisch erläutert.
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer

Years

Languages

  • e 78
  • d 53
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 105
  • m 21
  • s 12
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…