-
Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009)
0.01
0.010706769 = product of:
0.042827077 = sum of:
0.042827077 = product of:
0.06424061 = sum of:
0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575501 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028485604 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss some long-standing issues of the development of a subject heading language as pre- or postcoordinated. Design/methodology/approach - In a review of literature on pre- and postcoordination and user behaviour, 20 criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are considered. Findings - The advantages and disadvantages of pre- and postcoordinated systems are on a very similar level. Most subject heading languages developed recently are precoordinated. They all require investments in highly skilled intellectual work, and are therefore expensive and difficult to maintain. Postcoordinated systems seem to have more advantages for information providers, but less for users. However, most of these disadvantages could be overcome by known information retrieval models and techniques. Research limitations/implications - The criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are difficult to evaluate in an exact manner. Some of them are also irrelevant because of changes in information retrieval systems. Practical implications - It was found that the decision on whether to use a pre- or postcoordinated system cannot be taken independent of consideration of the subject authority file and the functions of an information retrieval system, which should support users on one hand and information providers and indexers on the other. Originality/value - This literature review brings together some findings that have not been considered together previously.
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:22:43
-
Sauperl, A.; Fidler, M.L.; Rozman, D.; Rozman Salobir, M.: Conclusions from the 2007 "Conference on the use of Universal Decimal Classification" in Slovenia (2007)
0.01
0.0057488354 = product of:
0.022995342 = sum of:
0.022995342 = product of:
0.06898602 = sum of:
0.06898602 = weight(_text_:29 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06898602 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.21-23
-
Sauperl, A.; Rozman, D.: Subject cataloguing at the crossroads : with or without subject heading strings? (2007)
0.00
0.0047476008 = product of:
0.018990403 = sum of:
0.018990403 = product of:
0.056971207 = sum of:
0.056971207 = weight(_text_:22 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056971207 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knjiznice za prihodnost : napredek in sodelovanje : zbornik referatov [ Libraries for the future : development and collaboration: proceedings / Professional conference of Union of associations of Slovene Librarians], Portoroz, October 22-23, 2007; ed. M. Ambrozic
-
Pogorelec, A.; Sauperl, A.: ¬The alternative model of classification of belles-lettres in libraries (2006)
0.00
0.004213768 = product of:
0.016855072 = sum of:
0.016855072 = product of:
0.050565217 = sum of:
0.050565217 = weight(_text_:language in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050565217 = score(doc=405,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30650726 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Several systems for the classification of fiction have been proposed to date, but experience shows that such classification partially depends on the culture and literary education in specific countries. Slovenian public libraries have traditionally used UDC as the only subject information on belles-lettres. Research has shown that users would prefer richer subject information. Therefore an attempt was made to enhance UDC by adding subject information, that should be helpful to users and librarians. The newly proposed Alternative Model system contains lists of verbal and alpha-numerical denotations for the basic groups of belles-lettres book material (main-genres: lyrics, drama, epics) and all other categorical criteria (language of the original literary work, literature to which the work belongs, genre, sub-genre) and half-categorical (accessibility of the content of literary works, origin within the periods of literary history, the century in which the literary work was written, the rhythm of the language). All these lists are available, but not included in this paper. The idea of the Alternative Model system is to show the possibilities of making the classification of belles-lettres in libraries more helpful, efficient and exact.
-
Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008)
0.00
0.004213768 = product of:
0.016855072 = sum of:
0.016855072 = product of:
0.050565217 = sum of:
0.050565217 = weight(_text_:language in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050565217 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30650726 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The international standard ISO 214:1976 defines an abstract as "an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document" (p. 1) that should "enable readers to identify the basic content of a document quickly and accurately to determine relevance" (p. 1). It also should be useful in computerized searching. The ISO standard suggests including the following elements: purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Researchers have often challenged this structure and found that different disciplines and cultures prefer different information content. These claims are partially supported by the findings of our research into the structure of pharmacology, sociology, and Slovenian language and literature abstracts of papers published in international and Slovenian scientific periodicals. The three disciplines have different information content. Slovenian pharmacology abstracts differ in content from those in international periodicals while the differences between international and Slovenian abstracts are small in sociology. In the field of Slovenian language and literature, only domestic abstracts were studied. The identified differences can in part be attributed to the disciplines, but also to the different role of journals and papers in the professional society and to differences in perception of the role of abstracts. The findings raise questions about the structure of abstracts required by some publishers of international journals.
-
Saye, J.; Sauperl, A.: Cataloging education on the sunny side of the alps (Slovenia) (2005)
0.00
0.003832557 = product of:
0.015330228 = sum of:
0.015330228 = product of:
0.045990683 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 18:53:35
-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.00
0.0033534872 = product of:
0.013413949 = sum of:
0.013413949 = product of:
0.040241845 = sum of:
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:07:21
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject cataloging process of Slovenian and American catalogers (2005)
0.00
0.002979584 = product of:
0.011918336 = sum of:
0.011918336 = product of:
0.03575501 = sum of:
0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575501 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - An empirical study has shown that the real process of subject cataloging does not correspond entirely to theoretical descriptions in textbooks and international standards. The purpose of this is paper is to address the issue of whether it be possible for catalogers who have not received formal training to perform subject cataloging in a different way to their trained colleagues. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative study was conducted in 2001 among five Slovenian public library catalogers. The resulting model is compared to previous findings. Findings - First, all catalogers attempted to determine what the book was about. While the American catalogers tried to understand the topic and the author's intent, the Slovenian catalogers appeared to focus on the topic only. Slovenian and American academic library catalogers did not demonstrate any anticipation of possible uses that users might have of the book, while this was important for American public library catalogers. All catalogers used existing records to build new ones and/or to search for subject headings. The verification of subject representation with the indexing language was the last step in the subject cataloging process of American catalogers, often skipped by Slovenian catalogers. Research limitations/implications - The small and convenient sample limits the findings. Practical implications - Comparison of subject cataloging processes of Slovenian and American catalogers, two different groups, is important because they both contribute to OCLC's WorldCat database. If the cataloging community is building a universal catalog and approaches to subject description are different, then the resulting subject representations might also be different. Originality/value - This is one of the very few empirical studies of subject cataloging and indexing.
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.00
0.0028485605 = product of:
0.011394242 = sum of:
0.011394242 = product of:
0.034182724 = sum of:
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.00
0.0014242802 = product of:
0.005697121 = sum of:
0.005697121 = product of:
0.017091362 = sum of:
0.017091362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017091362 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
