Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, W.G.; Stock, M.: Handbook of information science : a comprehensive handbook (2013) 0.01 
    0.010749864 = product of:
  0.042999458 = sum of:
    0.042999458 = product of:
      0.064499184 = sum of:
        0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03575501 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
        0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028744178 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Dealing with information is one of the vital skills in the 21st century. It takes a fair degree of information savvy to create, represent and supply information as well as to search for and retrieve relevant knowledge. How does information (documents, pieces of knowledge) have to be organized in order to be retrievable? What role does metadata play? What are search engines on the Web, or in corporate intranets, and how do they work? How must one deal with natural language processing and tools of knowledge organization, such as thesauri, classification systems, and ontologies? How useful is social tagging? How valuable are intellectually created abstracts and automatically prepared extracts? Which empirical methods allow for user research and which for the evaluation of information systems? This Handbook is a basic work of information science, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of information retrieval and knowledge representation. It addresses readers from all professions and scientific disciplines, but particularly scholars, practitioners and students of Information Science, Library Science, Computer Science, Information Management, and Knowledge Management. This Handbook is a suitable reference work for Public and Academic Libraries.
    Date
    14.10.2013 19:29:54
  2. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.01 
    0.0075961608 = product of:
  0.030384643 = sum of:
    0.030384643 = product of:
      0.09115393 = sum of:
        0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09115393 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  3. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.01 
    0.0075961608 = product of:
  0.030384643 = sum of:
    0.030384643 = product of:
      0.09115393 = sum of:
        0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09115393 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  4. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.01 
    0.0075961608 = product of:
  0.030384643 = sum of:
    0.030384643 = product of:
      0.09115393 = sum of:
        0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09115393 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  5. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.01 
    0.0066466406 = product of:
  0.026586562 = sum of:
    0.026586562 = product of:
      0.07975969 = sum of:
        0.07975969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07975969 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  6. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.0047476008 = product of:
  0.018990403 = sum of:
    0.018990403 = product of:
      0.056971207 = sum of:
        0.056971207 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056971207 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  7. Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004) 0.00 
    0.004128633 = product of:
  0.016514532 = sum of:
    0.016514532 = product of:
      0.049543597 = sum of:
        0.049543597 = weight(_text_:language in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049543597 = score(doc=5249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30031458 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
  8. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.00 
    0.0037980804 = product of:
  0.0151923215 = sum of:
    0.0151923215 = product of:
      0.045576964 = sum of:
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  9. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    0.0035755006 = product of:
  0.014302002 = sum of:
    0.014302002 = product of:
      0.042906005 = sum of:
        0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906005 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.26008 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
  10. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.00 
    0.0033534872 = product of:
  0.013413949 = sum of:
    0.013413949 = product of:
      0.040241845 = sum of:
        0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040241845 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
  11. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.00 
    0.0033233203 = product of:
  0.013293281 = sum of:
    0.013293281 = product of:
      0.039879844 = sum of:
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  12. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.00 
    0.0023953482 = product of:
  0.009581393 = sum of:
    0.009581393 = product of:
      0.028744178 = sum of:
        0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028744178 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
  13. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.00 
    0.0023738004 = product of:
  0.0094952015 = sum of:
    0.0094952015 = product of:
      0.028485604 = sum of:
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
  14. Stock, W.G.: Hochschulmanagement, Information Appliances, Fairness als Grundsatz : Information und Mobilität (2002) 0.00 
    0.0023738004 = product of:
  0.0094952015 = sum of:
    0.0094952015 = product of:
      0.028485604 = sum of:
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=1364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 19:39:36
  15. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.00 
    0.0023738004 = product of:
  0.0094952015 = sum of:
    0.0094952015 = product of:
      0.028485604 = sum of:
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
  16. Stock, W.G.: Information Retrieval : Informationen suchen und finden (2007) 0.00 
    0.0017877503 = product of:
  0.007151001 = sum of:
    0.007151001 = product of:
      0.021453002 = sum of:
        0.021453002 = weight(_text_:language in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021453002 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.13004 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: - Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft Ziel der Buchreihe - Informationswissenschaft - Information und Wissen - Propädeutik des Information Retrieval Geschichte des Information Retrieval - Grundbegriffe des Information Retrieval - Relevanz und Pertinenz - Dokumente - Typologie von Retrievalsystemen - Architektur eines Retrievalsystems - Boolesche Retrievalsysteme Boolesches Retrieval - Informetrische Analysen - Erweitertes Boolesches Retrieval - Informationslinguistik - Natural Language Processing n-Gramme - Worte - Phrasen, Eigennamen, Komposita - Begriffe - Anaphora - Fehlertolerantes Retrieval - Klassische Retrievalmodelle Textstatistik - Vektorraummodell - Probabilistisches Modell - Web Information Retrieval Linktopologie - Strukturinformationen in Dokumenten - Nutzer und Nutzung - Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung - Spezialprobleme des Information Retrieval Soziale Netzwerke und "small worlds" - Kontrolliertes Vokabular - Sprachübergreifendes Retrieval - Anfragedialog - Retrieval von Textstellen - Bild- und Tonretrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 13
  • e 3

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications