-
Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013)
0.02
0.01713083 = product of:
0.06852332 = sum of:
0.06852332 = product of:
0.10278498 = sum of:
0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720801 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper provides rationale for considering precepts for an engaged knowledge organization based on a Buddhist conception of intentional action. Casting knowledge organization work as craft, this paper employs Zizek's conception of violence in language as a call to action. The paper closes with a listing of precepts for an engaged knowledge organization.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:54:49
-
Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003)
0.01
0.010749864 = product of:
0.042999458 = sum of:
0.042999458 = product of:
0.064499184 = sum of:
0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575501 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028744178 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper outlines the assumptions, process and results of a pilot study of issues of interoperability among a set of seven existing controlled vocabulary schemes that make statements about the audience of an educational resource. The notion of audience for the study was defined in terms of the semantics of the Dublin Core metadata element of the same name: "A category of user for whom the resource is intended." The study used a data collection technique, card sorting, to see how nonexpert users sorted terms in the seven vocabularies into relationships and what their thought processes were in sorting these terms. The need for controlled vocabulary interoperability is a pressing concern for the education community as well as many others. In particular, the current study was informed by the need of the Dublin Core Education Working Group (www.dublin core.org/groups/education/) to explore the possibility of a high-level switching language in an application profile for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) audience element. An abundance of educational resources exists, many of which are available in the networked environment. Yet, theie are various conceptualizations of the domain in the form of different controlled vocabularies that limit access. Controlled vocabulary interoperability would allow these different conceptualizations to remain intact, thereby serving local needs while allowing users to navigate across collections and exploiting the intellectual network of resources available.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.20-23
-
Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002)
0.01
0.0057488354 = product of:
0.022995342 = sum of:
0.022995342 = product of:
0.06898602 = sum of:
0.06898602 = weight(_text_:29 in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06898602 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
-
Tennis, J.T.: URIS and intertextuality : incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web (2004)
0.00
0.003832557 = product of:
0.015330228 = sum of:
0.015330228 = product of:
0.045990683 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:19:44
-
Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006)
0.00
0.003832557 = product of:
0.015330228 = sum of:
0.015330228 = product of:
0.045990683 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23.12.2007 10:14:29
-
Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016)
0.00
0.003832557 = product of:
0.015330228 = sum of:
0.015330228 = product of:
0.045990683 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012)
0.00
0.0037980804 = product of:
0.0151923215 = sum of:
0.0151923215 = product of:
0.045576964 = sum of:
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 2. 6.2013 18:33:22
-
Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014)
0.00
0.0033233203 = product of:
0.013293281 = sum of:
0.013293281 = product of:
0.039879844 = sum of:
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hauser, E.; Tennis, J.T.: Episemantics: aboutness as aroundness (2019)
0.00
0.002979584 = product of:
0.011918336 = sum of:
0.011918336 = product of:
0.03575501 = sum of:
0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575501 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.
