-
Kellsey, C.: Cataloging with Bibliofile : alternative to the bibliographic utilities for small college libraries (1998)
0.02
0.01504981 = product of:
0.06019924 = sum of:
0.06019924 = product of:
0.090298854 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliofile is a CD-ROM cataloguing product that provides LC MARC records. Available databases include English only, foreign language materials, audio-visual materials, as well as several that are more specialized. Bibliofile runs on a PC that may be connected to a network. Advantages over an online utility include lower cost, no telecommunication problems, no slow response times, fixed subscription rates with no hourly use charges, easy installation, searching and editing and good phone support. Disadvantages include no member-contributed records and no member holdings to use for interlibrary loan. A library should consider type and level of materials catalogued, existence of an interface with a local OPAC, total cataloguing time used, and other sources for ILL searching when considering bibliofile as a cataloguing alternative
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:18:29
-
ElSahn, M.: Multilingual access to moving image collections (2006)
0.01
0.0058992757 = product of:
0.023597103 = sum of:
0.023597103 = product of:
0.070791304 = sum of:
0.070791304 = weight(_text_:language in 6093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070791304 = score(doc=6093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.42911017 = fieldWeight in 6093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6093)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Association of Moving Image Archivists and the Library of Congress have established MIC; a collaborative website to catalogue the World's movies. The interface to this valuable resource is currently available only in English. This paper describes an IFLA-funded project to help localize MIC, for non-English language users. We are developing a toolkit to show members of other language groups how to research local collections and build non-English versions of the site. We will to test this toolkit by constructing versions of the site in three languages: French, Spanish, and Arabic, and providing MIC with html files ready to install. This paper includes material derived from the MIC website at: http://mic.imtc.gatech.edu/.
-
Benediktsson, D.: Problems of subject access to Icelandic collections throughout OPACs (1990)
0.00
0.004767334 = product of:
0.019069336 = sum of:
0.019069336 = product of:
0.05720801 = sum of:
0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720801 = score(doc=5546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Suggest reasons why there is no operational OPAC station yet in Iceland. Obstacles include the lack of compatability among computer systems adopted by the major libraries, the differing classification schemes used by them and the lack of a controlled indexing vocabulary or thesaurus for subject analysis in the Icelandic language. The Rejkjavik Municipal Library and the National Hospital Library, both users of the DOBIS/LIBIS system, will be the first users of a potential network of OPACs.
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬A look at new information retrieval protocols : SRU, OpenSearch/A9, CQL, and XQuery (2006)
0.00
0.0035755006 = product of:
0.014302002 = sum of:
0.014302002 = product of:
0.042906005 = sum of:
0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 6108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906005 = score(doc=6108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 6108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6108)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Libraries have a large stake in search protocols because library systems are diverse yet library users need to access multiple sites without learning the search syntax of each site. This paper reviews and compares the relative advantages of several of the newest search protocols and query languages: Search via URL (SRU), OpenSearch, Contextual Query Language (CQL), and XQuery. The models for SRU and OpenSearch operations are described in order to explain differences in functionality - keyword search and simple data record return for OpenSearch and richer search with multiple format data return for SRU. The advantages of CQL are described along with possible complementary uses of the highly detailed and complex XQuery being developed for XML.
-
Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016)
0.00
0.0014242802 = product of:
0.005697121 = sum of:
0.005697121 = product of:
0.017091362 = sum of:
0.017091362 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017091362 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
