Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014989476 = product of:
  0.059957903 = sum of:
    0.059957903 = product of:
      0.08993685 = sum of:
        0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 4662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05005701 = score(doc=4662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 4662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4662)
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=4662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4662)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Communication studies at present have reached an impasse because of the proliferation of competing theories, none of which is fully explanatory. 4 main paradigms can be distinguished, deriving respectively from studies of mass communication developed in the US; the French school, focusing on communication 'messages'; the Frankfurt school, originating in the critique of modern industrial society; and Latin American theorists, concerned with cultural domination and imperialism. The way forward lies in establishing some linkage - a harmonious polyphony - between these divergent views, by taking language as the nodal point since this is the necassary common basis of all communication

Source

Revista da Escola de Biblioteconomia da UFMG. 22(1993), no.2, S.133-167

0.0128998365 = product of:
  0.051599346 = sum of:
    0.051599346 = product of:
      0.077399015 = sum of:
        0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906005 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.26008 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
        0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03449301 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

SIPORbase, the System for Indexing in Portuguese, was developed by the National Library of Portugal, based on the LCSH. In contrast to the Brunet-Parguez system used in France, SIPORbase is a coextensive indexing language. Its initial application in 1989 to current bibliography has been extended to the collection of codices. Experience with manuscripts only indicates a high degree of relevance in retrieval, from the several hundred subject headings created so far

Date

29. 7.1998 13:16:16

0.004767334 = product of:
  0.019069336 = sum of:
    0.019069336 = product of:
      0.05720801 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The status of indexing as a science is much disouted on the grounds that it depends essentially on the subjective view of the indexer. Given an epistemological perspective, however, this argument cannot be sustained. Indexing, like all modern sciences, has clearly defined objectives (e.g. the Unesco definition) and methods (identification of the indexing phrase, then translation into the indexing language), and the outcome can be evaluated in terms of specific criteria (effectiveness, efficiency, value)

0.003832557 = product of:
  0.015330228 = sum of:
    0.015330228 = product of:
      0.045990683 = sum of:
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

29. 7.1998 13:12:48