Search (104 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Blake, P.: Taking HTML to the next level : XML allows you to define your own language (1997) 0.13 
    0.13005678 = product of:
  0.26011357 = sum of:
    0.2270845 = weight(_text_:markup in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2270845 = score(doc=229,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.8216154 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
    0.033029065 = product of:
      0.09908719 = sum of:
        0.09908719 = weight(_text_:language in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09908719 = score(doc=229,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.60062915 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Extensible Markup Language (XML) attempts to overcome the limitations of HyperText Markup Language (HTML) by offering the ability to deploy more sophisticated documents anc exchange complex data over the WWW. A simplified version of SGML, XML has been developed by the WWW Consortium (W3C), is at first draft stage with the W3C and is supported by the latest version of Netscape and Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0
  2. Markup and metadata (1998) 0.13 
    0.1270263 = product of:
  0.2540526 = sum of:
    0.2270845 = weight(_text_:markup in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2270845 = score(doc=1835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.8216154 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
    0.026968118 = product of:
      0.08090435 = sum of:
        0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08090435 = score(doc=1835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the range of applications of the XML meta language, which allows users to design their own markup language and share it with others. Instead of being confined to HTML, where 'one size fits all', industries, academic disciplines and professional organizations can use XML syntax to create a common set of tags which standardize the presentation of information. The linking abilities of XML are more powerful than HTML, so that it will support bidirectional and multiway links, as well as those to a span of text rather than to a single point
  3. Flammia, G.: Document object models for the information marketplace (1997) 0.12 
    0.123076916 = product of:
  0.24615383 = sum of:
    0.2270845 = weight(_text_:markup in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2270845 = score(doc=1692,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.8216154 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
    0.019069336 = product of:
      0.05720801 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Extensible Markup Language (XML) is an extension of HTML which simplifies the creation of specialized markup languages for any application domain without requiring knowledge of SGML. Reviews some of the features of XML that make it attractive for conducting secure electronic transactions over the Internet and keeping a record of them
  4. Palme, J.: HTML / XML / SGML : Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (1998) 0.12 
    0.11668112 = product of:
  0.23336224 = sum of:
    0.20859045 = weight(_text_:markup in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20859045 = score(doc=6620,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.754702 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
    0.0247718 = product of:
      0.0743154 = sum of:
        0.0743154 = weight(_text_:language in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0743154 = score(doc=6620,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.45047188 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von den Begriffen Dokumentation und Publikation werden die Probleme bei der Erfassung, Speicherung, Bereitstellung und langfristigen Archivierung von elektronischen Dokumenten mit komplexen Inhalten thematisiert. Der ISO-Standard 8879 (Standard Generalized Markup Language - SGML) stellt ein Konzept für die rStrukturierung von Wissen, das in elektronischen Dokumenten verschiedenster Art enthalten ist, zur Verfügung. Da SGML ein internationaler Standard ist und auf dem Prinzip der Hard- und Softwareunabhängigkeit basiert, kann SGML für Verwaltung und Pflege von komplexen Lebenszeitendokumenten eingesetzt werden. Die am Inhalt orientierte Strukturierung der Dokumente läßt sich darüber hinaus für ein qualitätvolles Retrieval nutzen. In Abgrenzung zu SGML werden die von dieser Norm abgeleiteten Konzepte von XML (Extensible Markup Language) und HTML (HyperText Markup Language) vorgestellt.
  5. Zschau, O.: ¬Eine Sprache für alle Fälle (2000) 0.11 
    0.11227646 = product of:
  0.22455291 = sum of:
    0.20071624 = weight(_text_:markup in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20071624 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.72621226 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
    0.023836672 = product of:
      0.07151002 = sum of:
        0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07151002 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Extensible Markup Language setzt sich als universelles Format zur Verarbeitung und zum Austausch von Daten immer mehr durch. SBO beschreibt die Grundlagen und stellt Anwendungen vor, die XML bereits unterstützen
  6. Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998) 0.09 
    0.08982116 = product of:
  0.17964232 = sum of:
    0.16057299 = weight(_text_:markup in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16057299 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.5809698 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
    0.019069336 = product of:
      0.05720801 = sum of:
        0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05720801 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
  7. Document markup (1997) 0.09 
    0.08515669 = product of:
  0.34062675 = sum of:
    0.34062675 = weight(_text_:markup in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34062675 = score(doc=182,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        1.2324231 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the role of the document markup languages: SGML, HTML and the newer and potentially highly significant XML in the field of electronic publishing
  8. Schwarz, I.; Umstätter, W.: Zum Prinzip der Objektdarstellung in SGML (1998) 0.08 
    0.07939145 = product of:
  0.1587829 = sum of:
    0.14192782 = weight(_text_:markup in 6617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14192782 = score(doc=6617,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.51350963 = fieldWeight in 6617, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6617)
    0.016855072 = product of:
      0.050565217 = sum of:
        0.050565217 = weight(_text_:language in 6617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050565217 = score(doc=6617,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30650726 = fieldWeight in 6617, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6617)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Semantische Thesauri sind dazu geeignet, Wissen zu strukturieren. Der vorliegende Beitrag soll unter anderem deutlich machen, daß die SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language) ein mögliches Instrument zum Aufbau semantischer Thesauri ist. Die SGML ist eine Metasprache, die geeignet ist, Texte in natürlicher Sprache mit Strukturen zu versehen, die das Erkennen des Informationsgehaltes eines Dokuments erleichtern. Zugleich wird damit unter anderem die Voraussetzung dafür geschaffen, Volltextindexierungen in einer Weise vorzunehmen, wie dies bislang nicht möglich war. Die rasant zunehmende Bedeutung der SGML, liegt zweifellos an der bekanntesten Document Type Definition (DTD) im Rahmen der SGML, der Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), wie wir sie im WWW (World Wide Web) des Internet in Anwendung finden. Darüber hinaus erfüllt SGML je nach DTD die Bedingungen, die Objektorientiertheit unserer natürlichen Sprache mit ihren definierbaren Begriffen sinnvoll zu unterstützen und beispielsweise mit Hilfe der objektorientierten Programmiersprache JAVA zu verarbeiten. Besonders hervorzuheben ist die sich damit verändernde Publikationsform bei wissensbasierten Texten, in denen SGML-Dokumente nicht mehr nur für sich zu betrachten sind, wie Zeitschriftenaufsätze oder Bücher, sondern die darüber hinaus in Form von Wissenselementen in einer Daten- und Wissensbank organisiert und recherchiert werden können
  9. Hirsch, S.: Aspekte der Entwicklung von Fachinformationssystemen auf der Basis von XML/RDF (2000) 0.08 
    0.078593515 = product of:
  0.15718703 = sum of:
    0.14050137 = weight(_text_:markup in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14050137 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.5083486 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
    0.01668567 = product of:
      0.05005701 = sum of:
        0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05005701 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In einem Problemaufriss werden die heutigen Schwierigkeiten professioneller Informationsbeschaffung mit dem Internet und seinen heterogenen Informationsbeständen skizziert. Mit dem Ziel, diese Situation zu verbessern, sind die beiden neuen Standards entwickelt worden: Extensible Markup Language (XML) und Resource Description Framework (RDF). Es wird aus dokumentarischer Sicht ein Einblick in die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dieser Techniken, ihre Syntax und Semantik gegeben. In einem Überblick werden erste Beispiele für XML/RDF-Komponenten in zukünftigen Fachinformationssystemen vorgestellt. Auf absehbare ökonomische, politische und juristische Konsequenzen der Anwendung von XML/RDF für Informations- und Dokumentationsstellen wird eingegangen. Es werden mögliche neue Aufgaben für die Informationswissenschaft im Rahmen der XML- und RDF-Entwicklung aufgezeigt
  10. Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005) 0.07 
    0.06502839 = product of:
  0.13005678 = sum of:
    0.11354225 = weight(_text_:markup in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11354225 = score(doc=3005,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.4108077 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
    0.016514532 = product of:
      0.049543597 = sum of:
        0.049543597 = weight(_text_:language in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049543597 = score(doc=3005,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30031458 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
  11. Miller, D.R.: XML: Libraries' strategic opportunity (2001) 0.06 
    0.05613823 = product of:
  0.11227646 = sum of:
    0.10035812 = weight(_text_:markup in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10035812 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.36310613 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
    0.011918336 = product of:
      0.03575501 = sum of:
        0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03575501 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is fast gaining favor as the universal format for data and document exchange -- in effect becoming the lingua franca of the Information Age. Currently, "library information" is at a particular disadvantage on the rapidly evolving World Wide Web. Why? Despite libraries'explorations of web catalogs, scanning projects, digital data repositories, and creation of web pages galore, there remains a digital divide. The core of libraries' data troves are stored in proprietary formats of integrated library systems (ILS) and in the complex and arcane MARC formats -- both restricted chiefly to the province of technical services and systems librarians. Even they are hard-pressed to extract and integrate this wealth of data with resources from outside this rarefied environment. Segregation of library information underlies many difficulties: producing standard bibliographic citations from MARC data, automatically creating new materials lists (including new web resources) on a particular topic, exchanging data with our vendors, and even migrating from one ILS to another. Why do we continue to hobble our potential by embracing these self-imposed limitations? Most ILSs began in libraries, which soon recognized the pitfalls of do-it-yourself solutions. Thus, we wisely anticipated the necessity for standards. However, with the advent of the web, we soon found "our" collections and a flood of new resources appearing in digital format on opposite sides of the divide. If we do not act quickly to integrate library resources with mainstream web resources, we are in grave danger of becoming marginalized
  12. McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998) 0.04 
    0.040143248 = product of:
  0.16057299 = sum of:
    0.16057299 = weight(_text_:markup in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16057299 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.5809698 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02 
    0.019076593 = product of:
  0.07630637 = sum of:
    0.07630637 = product of:
      0.11445956 = sum of:
        0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057488356 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
        0.056971207 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056971207 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  14. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.02 
    0.015261276 = product of:
  0.061045103 = sum of:
    0.061045103 = product of:
      0.09156765 = sum of:
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:29:32
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  15. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.02 
    0.015261276 = product of:
  0.061045103 = sum of:
    0.061045103 = product of:
      0.09156765 = sum of:
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  16. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.008056946 = product of:
  0.032227784 = sum of:
    0.032227784 = product of:
      0.096683346 = sum of:
        0.096683346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096683346 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  17. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.01 
    0.007665114 = product of:
  0.030660456 = sum of:
    0.030660456 = product of:
      0.09198137 = sum of:
        0.09198137 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09198137 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327
  18. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0075961608 = product of:
  0.030384643 = sum of:
    0.030384643 = product of:
      0.09115393 = sum of:
        0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09115393 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  19. Devadason, F.J.: Common format for machine-readable bibliographic records for India : a proposal (1978) 0.01 
    0.0067069745 = product of:
  0.026827898 = sum of:
    0.026827898 = product of:
      0.08048369 = sum of:
        0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08048369 = score(doc=5539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Towards a common bibliographic exchange format? International Symposium on Bibliographic Exchange Formats, Taormina, Sicily, 27-29 April 1978
  20. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.01 
    0.0067069745 = product of:
  0.026827898 = sum of:
    0.026827898 = product of:
      0.08048369 = sum of:
        0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08048369 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.9, S.1428-1446

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 65
  • d 22
  • f 8
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 92
  • s 9
  • m 6
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications