Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.02
    0.01504981 = product of:
      0.06019924 = sum of:
        0.06019924 = product of:
          0.090298854 = sum of:
            0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05005701 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
            0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040241845 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  2. Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997) 0.01
    0.011445956 = product of:
      0.045783825 = sum of:
        0.045783825 = product of:
          0.068675734 = sum of:
            0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03449301 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.211-216
  3. Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982) 0.01
    0.007665114 = product of:
      0.030660456 = sum of:
        0.030660456 = product of:
          0.09198137 = sum of:
            0.09198137 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09198137 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29
  4. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.01
    0.0075961608 = product of:
      0.030384643 = sum of:
        0.030384643 = product of:
          0.09115393 = sum of:
            0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09115393 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  5. Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18
  6. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.01
    0.0058387686 = product of:
      0.023355074 = sum of:
        0.023355074 = product of:
          0.07006522 = sum of:
            0.07006522 = weight(_text_:language in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07006522 = score(doc=571,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4247089 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
  7. Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey Decimal Classification : 125 and still growing (2001) 0.01
    0.0057488354 = product of:
      0.022995342 = sum of:
        0.022995342 = product of:
          0.06898602 = sum of:
            0.06898602 = weight(_text_:29 in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06898602 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 2001, no.2, Nov./Dec., S.27-29
  8. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.01
    0.005697121 = product of:
      0.022788484 = sum of:
        0.022788484 = product of:
          0.06836545 = sum of:
            0.06836545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06836545 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  9. Barber, E.E.; Tripaldi, N.M.; Pisano, S.L.: Facts, approaches, and reflections on classification in the history of Argentine librarianship (2003) 0.00
    0.0047906963 = product of:
      0.019162785 = sum of:
        0.019162785 = product of:
          0.057488356 = sum of:
            0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057488356 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:08
  10. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.00
    0.003832557 = product of:
      0.015330228 = sum of:
        0.015330228 = product of:
          0.045990683 = sum of:
            0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045990683 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    28.12.2007 19:29:10
  11. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.00
    0.0037980804 = product of:
      0.0151923215 = sum of:
        0.0151923215 = product of:
          0.045576964 = sum of:
            0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045576964 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  12. Rafferty, P.: ¬The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes (2001) 0.00
    0.0035755006 = product of:
      0.014302002 = sum of:
        0.014302002 = product of:
          0.042906005 = sum of:
            0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906005 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.26008 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the representation of knowledge through the discursive practice of 'general' or 'universal' classification schemes. These classification schemes were constructed within a philosophical framework which viewed `man' as the central focus in the universe, which believed in progress through science and research, and which privileged written documentation over other forms. All major classification schemes are built on clearly identifiable systems of knowledge, and all classification schemes, as discursive formations, regulate the ways in which knowledge is made accessible. Of particular interest in determining how knowledge is represented in classification schemes are the following: - Main classes: classification theorists have attempted to 'discipline epistemology' in the sense of imposing main class structures with the view to simplifying access to knowledge in documents for library users. - Notational language: a number of classification theorists were particularly interested in the establishment of symbolic languages through notation. The article considers these aspects of classification theory in relation to: the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme; Otlet and La Fontaine's Universal Bibliographic Classification and the International Institute of Bibliography; Henry Evelyn Bliss's Bibliographic Classification; and S.R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification.
  13. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.00
    0.0033710147 = product of:
      0.013484059 = sum of:
        0.013484059 = product of:
          0.040452175 = sum of:
            0.040452175 = weight(_text_:language in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040452175 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.2452058 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
  14. Olson, H.A.: Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy : our aristotelean legacy (1999) 0.00
    0.0033534872 = product of:
      0.013413949 = sum of:
        0.013413949 = product of:
          0.040241845 = sum of:
            0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040241845 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 3.2000 10:28:29
  15. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.00
    0.0033233203 = product of:
      0.013293281 = sum of:
        0.013293281 = product of:
          0.039879844 = sum of:
            0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039879844 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  16. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.00
    0.0033233203 = product of:
      0.013293281 = sum of:
        0.013293281 = product of:
          0.039879844 = sum of:
            0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039879844 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  17. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.0033233203 = product of:
      0.013293281 = sum of:
        0.013293281 = product of:
          0.039879844 = sum of:
            0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039879844 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  18. LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000) 0.00
    0.0028744177 = product of:
      0.011497671 = sum of:
        0.011497671 = product of:
          0.03449301 = sum of:
            0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03449301 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:43:23
  19. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.00
    0.0028485605 = product of:
      0.011394242 = sum of:
        0.011394242 = product of:
          0.034182724 = sum of:
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.00
    0.0023953482 = product of:
      0.009581393 = sum of:
        0.009581393 = product of:
          0.028744178 = sum of:
            0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028744178 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:58:02

Languages

Types

  • a 22
  • m 1
  • More… Less…