Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

0.03426166 = product of:
  0.13704664 = sum of:
    0.13704664 = product of:
      0.20556995 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
        0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09115393 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108

0.032822523 = product of:
  0.1312901 = sum of:
    0.1312901 = product of:
      0.19693513 = sum of:
        0.15135817 = weight(_text_:language in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15135817 = score(doc=7415,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.9174761 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
        0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045576964 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly

0.020071624 = product of:
  0.080286495 = sum of:
    0.080286495 = weight(_text_:markup in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080286495 = score(doc=4278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042049456 = queryNorm
        0.2904849 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

How do we find information an the Web? Although information on the Web is distributed and decentralized, the Web can be viewed as a single, virtual document collection. In that regard, the fundamental questions and approaches of traditional information retrieval (IR) research (e.g., term weighting, query expansion) are likely to be relevant in Web document retrieval. Findings from traditional IR research, however, may not always be applicable in a Web setting. The Web document collection - massive in size and diverse in content, format, purpose, and quality - challenges the validity of previous research findings that are based an relatively small and homogeneous test collections. Moreover, some traditional IR approaches, although applicable in theory, may be impossible or impractical to implement in a Web setting. For instance, the size, distribution, and dynamic nature of Web information make it extremely difficult to construct a complete and up-to-date data representation of the kind required for a model IR system. To further complicate matters, information seeking on the Web is diverse in character and unpredictable in nature. Web searchers come from all walks of life and are motivated by many kinds of information needs. The wide range of experience, knowledge, motivation, and purpose means that searchers can express diverse types of information needs in a wide variety of ways with differing criteria for satisfying those needs. Conventional evaluation measures, such as precision and recall, may no longer be appropriate for Web IR, where a representative test collection is all but impossible to construct. Finding information on the Web creates many new challenges for, and exacerbates some old problems in, IR research. At the same time, the Web is rich in new types of information not present in most IR test collections. Hyperlinks, usage statistics, document markup tags, and collections of topic hierarchies such as Yahoo! (http://www.yahoo.com) present an opportunity to leverage Web-specific document characteristics in novel ways that go beyond the term-based retrieval framework of traditional IR. Consequently, researchers in Web IR have reexamined the findings from traditional IR research.

0.012848122 = product of:
  0.05139249 = sum of:
    0.05139249 = product of:
      0.07708873 = sum of:
        0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906005 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.26008 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
        0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034182724 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.011798551 = product of:
  0.047194205 = sum of:
    0.047194205 = product of:
      0.14158261 = sum of:
        0.14158261 = weight(_text_:language in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14158261 = score(doc=1842,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.85822034 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This bibliography lists research in Automatic Identification of Spoken Language.

0.011148583 = product of:
  0.044594333 = sum of:
    0.044594333 = product of:
      0.133783 = sum of:
        0.133783 = weight(_text_:language in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.133783 = score(doc=4277,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.810942 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This chapter reviews research and applications in statistical language modeling for information retrieval (IR), which has emerged within the past several years as a new probabilistic framework for describing information retrieval processes. Generally speaking, statistical language modeling, or more simply language modeling (LM), involves estimating a probability distribution that captures statistical regularities of natural language use. Applied to information retrieval, language modeling refers to the problem of estimating the likelihood that a query and a document could have been generated by the same language model, given the language model of the document either with or without a language model of the query. The roots of statistical language modeling date to the beginning of the twentieth century when Markov tried to model letter sequences in works of Russian literature (Manning & Schütze, 1999). Zipf (1929, 1932, 1949, 1965) studied the statistical properties of text and discovered that the frequency of works decays as a Power function of each works rank. However, it was Shannon's (1951) work that inspired later research in this area. In 1951, eager to explore the applications of his newly founded information theory to human language, Shannon used a prediction game involving n-grams to investigate the information content of English text. He evaluated n-gram models' performance by comparing their crossentropy an texts with the true entropy estimated using predictions made by human subjects. For many years, statistical language models have been used primarily for automatic speech recognition. Since 1980, when the first significant language model was proposed (Rosenfeld, 2000), statistical language modeling has become a fundamental component of speech recognition, machine translation, and spelling correction.

0.010113044 = product of:
  0.040452175 = sum of:
    0.040452175 = product of:
      0.12135652 = sum of:
        0.12135652 = weight(_text_:language in 8663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12135652 = score(doc=8663,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 8663, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Contains references to more than 6000 publications with a subject and a language index as well as a guide to the relevant languages and language families

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009534668 = product of:
  0.038138673 = sum of:
    0.038138673 = product of:
      0.11441602 = sum of:
        0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11441602 = score(doc=287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.009485095 = product of:
  0.03794038 = sum of:
    0.03794038 = product of:
      0.113821134 = sum of:
        0.113821134 = weight(_text_:29 in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113821134 = score(doc=1733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

9. 1.1999 18:29:29

0.008758154 = product of:
  0.035032615 = sum of:
    0.035032615 = product of:
      0.10509784 = sum of:
        0.10509784 = weight(_text_:language in 4284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10509784 = score(doc=4284,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.6370634 = fieldWeight in 4284, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4284)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is an area of research and application that explores how computers can be used to understand and manipulate natural language text or speech to do useful things. NLP researchers aim to gather knowledge an how human beings understand and use language so that appropriate tools and techniques can be developed to make computer systems understand and manipulate natural languages to perform desired tasks. The foundations of NLP lie in a number of disciplines, namely, computer and information sciences, linguistics, mathematics, electrical and electronic engineering, artificial intelligence and robotics, and psychology. Applications of NLP include a number of fields of study, such as machine translation, natural language text processing and summarization, user interfaces, multilingual and cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), speech recognition, artificial intelligence, and expert systems. One important application area that is relatively new and has not been covered in previous ARIST chapters an NLP relates to the proliferation of the World Wide Web and digital libraries.

0.008342835 = product of:
  0.03337134 = sum of:
    0.03337134 = product of:
      0.10011402 = sum of:
        0.10011402 = weight(_text_:language in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10011402 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.008342835 = product of:
  0.03337134 = sum of:
    0.03337134 = product of:
      0.10011402 = sum of:
        0.10011402 = weight(_text_:language in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10011402 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.008342835 = product of:
  0.03337134 = sum of:
    0.03337134 = product of:
      0.10011402 = sum of:
        0.10011402 = weight(_text_:language in 6421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10011402 = score(doc=6421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 6421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6421)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)