Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Wang, F.L.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The impact analysis of language differences on an automatic multilingual text summarization system (2006) 0.01
    0.005959168 = product of:
      0.023836672 = sum of:
        0.023836672 = product of:
          0.07151002 = sum of:
            0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07151002 = score(doc=5049,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the salient features of the documents, automatic text summarization systems extract the key sentences from source documents. This process supports the users in evaluating the relevance of the extracted documents returned by information retrieval systems. Because of this tool, efficient filtering can be achieved. Indirectly, these systems help to resolve the problem of information overloading. Many automatic text summarization systems have been implemented for use with different languages. It has been established that the grammatical and lexical differences between languages have a significant effect on text processing. However, the impact of the language differences on the automatic text summarization systems has not yet been investigated. The authors provide an impact analysis of language difference on automatic text summarization. It includes the effect on the extraction processes, the scoring mechanisms, the performance, and the matching of the extracted sentences, using the parallel corpus in English and Chinese as the tested object. The analysis results provide a greater understanding of language differences and promote the future development of more advanced text summarization techniques.
  6. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.00
    0.004767334 = product of:
      0.019069336 = sum of:
        0.019069336 = product of:
          0.05720801 = sum of:
            0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05720801 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
  7. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    0.0047476008 = product of:
      0.018990403 = sum of:
        0.018990403 = product of:
          0.056971207 = sum of:
            0.056971207 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056971207 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  8. Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008) 0.00
    0.004213768 = product of:
      0.016855072 = sum of:
        0.016855072 = product of:
          0.050565217 = sum of:
            0.050565217 = weight(_text_:language in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050565217 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30650726 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The international standard ISO 214:1976 defines an abstract as "an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document" (p. 1) that should "enable readers to identify the basic content of a document quickly and accurately to determine relevance" (p. 1). It also should be useful in computerized searching. The ISO standard suggests including the following elements: purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Researchers have often challenged this structure and found that different disciplines and cultures prefer different information content. These claims are partially supported by the findings of our research into the structure of pharmacology, sociology, and Slovenian language and literature abstracts of papers published in international and Slovenian scientific periodicals. The three disciplines have different information content. Slovenian pharmacology abstracts differ in content from those in international periodicals while the differences between international and Slovenian abstracts are small in sociology. In the field of Slovenian language and literature, only domestic abstracts were studied. The identified differences can in part be attributed to the disciplines, but also to the different role of journals and papers in the professional society and to differences in perception of the role of abstracts. The findings raise questions about the structure of abstracts required by some publishers of international journals.
  9. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.00
    0.0041714176 = product of:
      0.01668567 = sum of:
        0.01668567 = product of:
          0.05005701 = sum of:
            0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05005701 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures
  10. Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009) 0.00
    0.0041714176 = product of:
      0.01668567 = sum of:
        0.01668567 = product of:
          0.05005701 = sum of:
            0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05005701 = score(doc=3610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to argue for a conception of information literacy (IL) that goes beyond the abilities of finding information as it includes communication skills. An important issue in this is that abstractors exercise IL on a professional level. Design/methodology/approach - By stressing the importance of the fact that information literacy extends towards verbal communication the paper takes an interdisciplinary approach, the main component of which is linguistics. Findings - It is found that verbal communication and especially analytic-synthetic writing activities play an important role in information literacy at the level of everyday language use, semi-professional and professional summarising of information. The latter level characterises abstracting. Originality/value - The paper adds to the body of knowledge about information literacy in general and in connection with communication and abstracting.
  11. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.00
    0.003832557 = product of:
      0.015330228 = sum of:
        0.015330228 = product of:
          0.045990683 = sum of:
            0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045990683 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  12. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0037980804 = product of:
      0.0151923215 = sum of:
        0.0151923215 = product of:
          0.045576964 = sum of:
            0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045576964 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  13. Montesi, M.; Urdiciain, B.G.: Recent linguistic research into author abstracts : its value for information science (2005) 0.00
    0.0035755006 = product of:
      0.014302002 = sum of:
        0.014302002 = product of:
          0.042906005 = sum of:
            0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906005 = score(doc=4823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.26008 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is a review of genre analysis of author abstracts carried out in the area of English for Special Purposes (ESP) since 1990. Given the descriptive character of such analysis, it can be valuable for Information Science (IS), as it provides a picture of the variation in author abstracts, depending an the discipline, culture and language of the author, and the envisaged context. The authors claim that such knowledge can be useful for information professionals who need to revise author abstracts, or use them for other activities in the organization of knowledge, such as subject analysis and control of vocabulary. With this purpose in mind, we summarize various findings of ESP research. We describe how abstracts vary in structure, content and discourse, and how linguists explain such variations. Other factors taken into account are the stylistic and discoursal features of the abstract, lexical choices, and the possible sources of blas. In conclusion, we show how such findings can have practical and theoretical implications for IS.
  14. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.00
    0.0035755006 = product of:
      0.014302002 = sum of:
        0.014302002 = product of:
          0.042906005 = sum of:
            0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906005 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.26008 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
  15. Koltay, T.: Abstracts and abstracting : a genre and set of skills for the twenty-first century (2010) 0.00
    0.002979584 = product of:
      0.011918336 = sum of:
        0.011918336 = product of:
          0.03575501 = sum of:
            0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03575501 = score(doc=4125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Despite their changing role, abstracts remain useful in the digital world. Aimed at both information professionals and researchers who work and publish in different fields, this book summarizes the most important and up-to-date theory of abstracting, as well as giving advice and examples for the practice of writing different kinds of abstracts. The book discusses the length, the functions and basic structure of abstracts. A new approach is outlined on the questions of informative and indicative abstracts. The abstractors' personality, their linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge and skills are also discussed with special attention. The process of abstracting, its steps and models, as well as recipient's role are treated with special distinction. Abstracting is presented as an aimed (purported) understanding of the original text, its interpretation and then a special projection of the information deemed to be worth of abstracting into a new text.Despite the relatively large number of textbooks on the topic there is no up-to-date book on abstracting in the English language. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of the topic, the proposed book contains novel views - especially on informative and indicative abstracts. The discussion is based on an interdisciplinary approach, blending the methods of library and information science and linguistics. The book strives to a synthesis of theory and practice. The synthesis is based on a large and existing body of knowledge which, however, is often characterised by misleading terminology and flawed beliefs.
  16. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0028485605 = product of:
      0.011394242 = sum of:
        0.011394242 = product of:
          0.034182724 = sum of:
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  17. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0028485605 = product of:
      0.011394242 = sum of:
        0.011394242 = product of:
          0.034182724 = sum of:
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  18. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0028485605 = product of:
      0.011394242 = sum of:
        0.011394242 = product of:
          0.034182724 = sum of:
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  19. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.00
    0.0023953482 = product of:
      0.009581393 = sum of:
        0.009581393 = product of:
          0.028744178 = sum of:
            0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028744178 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:19
  20. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0023738004 = product of:
      0.0094952015 = sum of:
        0.0094952015 = product of:
          0.028485604 = sum of:
            0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028485604 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356