Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980) 0.02
    0.021499729 = product of:
      0.085998915 = sum of:
        0.085998915 = product of:
          0.12899837 = sum of:
            0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07151002 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
            0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057488356 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 31(1980) H.1, S.29-35
  2. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.02
    0.015261276 = product of:
      0.061045103 = sum of:
        0.061045103 = product of:
          0.09156765 = sum of:
            0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045990683 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
            0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045576964 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Source
    Dokumente und Datenbanken in elektronischen Netzen: Tagungsberichte vom 6. und 7. Österreichischen Online-Informationstreffen bzw. vom 7. und 8. Österreichischen Dokumentartag, Schloß Seggau, Seggauberg bei Leibnitz, 26.-29. September 1995, Congresszentrum Igls bei Innsbruck, 21.-24. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: E. Pipp
  3. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.012848122 = product of:
      0.05139249 = sum of:
        0.05139249 = product of:
          0.07708873 = sum of:
            0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042906005 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.26008 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
            0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034182724 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  4. Graham, T.: ¬The free language approach to online catalogues : the user (1985) 0.01
    0.010113044 = product of:
      0.040452175 = sum of:
        0.040452175 = product of:
          0.12135652 = sum of:
            0.12135652 = weight(_text_:language in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12135652 = score(doc=1215,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Keyword catalogues and the free language approach. Ed.: Ph. Bryant
  5. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.01
    0.008342835 = product of:
      0.03337134 = sum of:
        0.03337134 = product of:
          0.10011402 = sum of:
            0.10011402 = weight(_text_:language in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10011402 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987) 0.01
    0.007665114 = product of:
      0.030660456 = sum of:
        0.030660456 = product of:
          0.09198137 = sum of:
            0.09198137 = weight(_text_:29 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09198137 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 112(1987) Nov.15, S.58-29
  7. Tauchert, W.; Hospodarsky, J.; Krause, J.; Schneider, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Effects of linguistic functions on information retrieval in a German language full-text database : comparison between retrieval in abstract and full text (1991) 0.01
    0.007151001 = product of:
      0.028604005 = sum of:
        0.028604005 = product of:
          0.08581201 = sum of:
            0.08581201 = weight(_text_:language in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08581201 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.52016 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.01
    0.007151001 = product of:
      0.028604005 = sum of:
        0.028604005 = product of:
          0.08581201 = sum of:
            0.08581201 = weight(_text_:language in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08581201 = score(doc=1795,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.52016 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  9. Allen, E.E.: Searching, naturally (1998) 0.01
    0.007151001 = product of:
      0.028604005 = sum of:
        0.028604005 = product of:
          0.08581201 = sum of:
            0.08581201 = weight(_text_:language in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08581201 = score(doc=2602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.52016 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Selected bibliography of books and articles relating to natural language processing (NLP). Includes numerous annotations
  10. Ashford, J.H.: Free text retrieval in the Welsh language : problems, and proposed working practice (1995) 0.01
    0.0067420295 = product of:
      0.026968118 = sum of:
        0.026968118 = product of:
          0.08090435 = sum of:
            0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08090435 = score(doc=6509,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A bilingual Welsh-English full text database is planned for Inspection Reports of Her Majesty's Inspectors of Schools for Wales. Special requirements for free text retrieval in the Welsh language are identified, and practical solutions are proposed for problems arising from the use of standard text database products, some of which may also apply to other lesser-used languages
  11. Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Comparing natural language retrieval : Win & Freestyle (1995) 0.01
    0.0067420295 = product of:
      0.026968118 = sum of:
        0.026968118 = product of:
          0.08090435 = sum of:
            0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08090435 = score(doc=2546,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a comparison of 2 natural language interfaces to full text legal databases: WIN for access to WESTLAW databases and FREESTYLE for access to the LEXIS database. 30 legal issues in natural langugae queries were presented to identical libraries in both systems. The top 20 ranked documents from each search were analyzed and reviewed for relevance to the legal issue
  12. Pipp, E.: Volltextdatenbanken im Vergleich (2001) 0.01
    0.0067069745 = product of:
      0.026827898 = sum of:
        0.026827898 = product of:
          0.08048369 = sum of:
            0.08048369 = weight(_text_:29 in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08048369 = score(doc=6509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 11:28:25
  13. Wacholder, N.; Byrd, R.J.: Retrieving information from full text using linguistic knowledge (1994) 0.01
    0.00619295 = product of:
      0.0247718 = sum of:
        0.0247718 = product of:
          0.0743154 = sum of:
            0.0743154 = weight(_text_:language in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0743154 = score(doc=8524,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.45047188 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how techniques in the field of natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of text in information retrieval. State of the art text searching programs cannot distinguish, for example, between occurrences of the sickness, AIDS and aids as tool or between library school and school nor equate such terms as online or on-line which are variants of the same form. To make these distinction, systems must incorporate knowledge about the meaning of words in context. Research in natural language processing has concentrated on the automatic 'understanding' of language; how to analyze the grammatical structure and meaning of text. Although many asoects of this research remain experimental, describes how these techniques to recognize spelling variants, names, acronyms, and abbreviations
  14. Witt, M.: Au sujet des mots-clés (1997) 0.01
    0.0054200543 = product of:
      0.021680217 = sum of:
        0.021680217 = product of:
          0.06504065 = sum of:
            0.06504065 = weight(_text_:29 in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06504065 = score(doc=1666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    29. 7.1998 18:19:41
  15. McKinin, E.J.; Sievert, M.E.; Johnson, D.; Mitchell, J.A.: ¬The Medline/full-text research project (1991) 0.01
    0.005056522 = product of:
      0.020226087 = sum of:
        0.020226087 = product of:
          0.06067826 = sum of:
            0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 5385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06067826 = score(doc=5385,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 5385, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5385)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This project was designed to test the relative efficacy of index terms and full-text for the retrieval of documents in those MEDLINE journals for which full-text searching was also available. The full-text files used were MEDIS from Mead Data Central and CCML from BRS Information Technologies. One hundred clinical medical topics were searches in these two files as well as the MEDLINE file to accumulate the necessary data. It was found that full-text identified significantly more relevant articles than did the indexed file. Most relevant items missed in the full-text files, but identified in MEDLINE, were missed because the searcher failed to account for some aspect of natural language, used a logical or positional operator that was too restrictive, or included a concept which was implied, but not expressed in the natural language. Very few of the unique relevant full-text citations would have been retrievaed by title or abstract alone. Finally, as of July, 1990 the more current issue of a journal was just as likely to appear in MEDLINE as in one of the full-text files.
  16. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.00
    0.0047906963 = product of:
      0.019162785 = sum of:
        0.019162785 = product of:
          0.057488356 = sum of:
            0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057488356 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  17. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.00
    0.0047906963 = product of:
      0.019162785 = sum of:
        0.019162785 = product of:
          0.057488356 = sum of:
            0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057488356 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  18. Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995) 0.00
    0.004767334 = product of:
      0.019069336 = sum of:
        0.019069336 = product of:
          0.05720801 = sum of:
            0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05720801 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the 2 major query evaluation strategies used in large text retrieval systems and analyzes the performance of these strategies. Discusses several optimization techniques that can be used to reduce evaluation costs and present simulation results to compare the performance of these optimization techniques when evaluating natural language queries with a collection of full text legal materials
  19. Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989) 0.00
    0.0041714176 = product of:
      0.01668567 = sum of:
        0.01668567 = product of:
          0.05005701 = sum of:
            0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05005701 = score(doc=2876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines searching capabilities and search results relating to the same full text data base made available by: a host that offers a command language designed for searching bibliographic data bases and a host that provides search facilities that have been specially designed for full text retrieval. Moreover, the CD-ROM format of an encyclopedia is compared with the equivalent on-line version of the same work, Academic American Encyclopedia. Results reveal that it is easier to search on those systems that offer searching facilities which have been specially designed for full text retrieval.
  20. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 2. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.00
    0.0041714176 = product of:
      0.01668567 = sum of:
        0.01668567 = product of:
          0.05005701 = sum of:
            0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05005701 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Port Authority an information database has been created with approx. 100.000 full text documents online. Topic software has been used to identify word groups and refine search strategies to optimize precision and recall. The software guides users from selected terms to other relevant word combinations. Although the system would benefit from further refinement, users are generally satisfied. The database includes a number of foreign language documents but lacks a thesaurus of foreign terms